Supreme Snort expand police state search powers

[The2ndAmendment]

Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com

WASHINGTON — Police officers may enter and search a home without a warrant as long as one occupant consents, even if another resident has previously objected, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in a Los Angeles case.

The 6-3 ruling, triggered by a Los Angeles Police Department arrest in 2009, gives authorities more leeway to search homes without obtaining a warrant, even when there is no emergency.

Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com

I'd blame it on being Commiefornia, but this is the Federal Supreme Snort of the United Crack Federation.

 

[KNB]

You loved Bush for signing the PATRIOT Act. Why do you have a problem with this?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com

WASHINGTON — Police officers may enter and search a home without a warrant as long as one occupant consents, even if another resident has previously objected, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in a Los Angeles case.

The 6-3 ruling, triggered by a Los Angeles Police Department arrest in 2009, gives authorities more leeway to search homes without obtaining a warrant, even when there is no emergency.

Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com

I'd blame it on being Commiefornia, but this is the Federal Supreme Snort of the United Crack Federation.

Do you have something to hide? Interesting...

 

[The2ndAmendment]

You loved Bush for signing the PATRIOT Act. Why do you have a problem with this?

No I didn't. And the Supreme Snort usurping Florida's State powers to select Bush was one of the most tragic blows to the Tenth Amendment.

Also, seeing that Mccain wants to invade Ukraine, I still stand by my vote for Obama in 2008.

Take your partisan shit elsewhere.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com

WASHINGTON — Police officers may enter and search a home without a warrant as long as one occupant consents, even if another resident has previously objected, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in a Los Angeles case.

The 6-3 ruling, triggered by a Los Angeles Police Department arrest in 2009, gives authorities more leeway to search homes without obtaining a warrant, even when there is no emergency.

Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com

I'd blame it on being Commiefornia, but this is the Federal Supreme Snort of the United Crack Federation.

Do you have something to hide? Interesting...

Do you share your private information with criminals and thugs?

If a local cop follows you as you drive long enough, he can find a reason to give you a ticket. If a Government Agent seeks personal revenge or harm against you, they can eventually destroy you if they are given unlimited power.

But that's what you Progressives want, the ability to destroy anyone whom opposes your ideology.

Do we need to go into the history behind the 4th Amendment, such as the Crown's abuse of General Search Warrants?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

No brainer ruling, if they have permission, they have permission.

 

[Clementine]

You loved Bush for signing the PATRIOT Act. Why do you have a problem with this?

You hated Bush for signing the Patriot Act. Why don't you have a problem with this?

The problem is way worse, yet the left remains silent. I guess they are saving criticism until a Republican is back in office, then they will demand that it all stop. As long as they think authorities are going after the "other" people, no problem.

It should stop now. It never should have started, but that is no excuse for increasing the police state.

 

[KNB]

You loved Bush for signing the PATRIOT Act. Why do you have a problem with this?

No I didn't. And the Supreme Snort usurping Florida's State powers to select Bush was one of the most tragic blows to the Tenth Amendment.

Also, seeing that Mccain wants to invade Ukraine, I still stand by my vote for Obama in 2008.

Take your partisan shit elsewhere.

You start out with ridiculous Teabagger tripe about "Commiefornia", as if you have any idea what Communism is, and then tell someone to drop the "partisan shit"? That's funny.

But seriously, when are all the 140m gun pussies going to use their second amendment rights to defend any other American rights that have been taken away?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Do you share your private information with criminals and thugs?

Share? They normally just help themselves. I might be sleeping and it would be rude to wake me.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

But seriously, when are all the 140m gun pussies going to use their second amendment rights to defend any other American rights that have been taken away?

Armed revolution is not justified unless:

1) Trial by Jury has been abolished/suspended/usurped.

No President/Governor/Executive can imprison an acquitted man. No Judge can overturn an acquittal, and no Legislative Body can pass a Bill of Attainder to override a decision by a Jury.

So long as Trial by Jury remains, the People only have THEMSELVES to blame for tyrannical abusing themselves, because only THE PEOPLE, you peers, can punish you.

2) Confiscation of Firearms.

The moment the People lose their firearms, then they will be unable to resist the usurpation of Trial by Jury.


------------------------------------------------------------------

Now let's bear in mind that the Obamacare penalty is immune to review by a Jury of your Peers, because the Supreme Snort declared it a tax --- a tax that shall only be paid when you violate the law --- also known as a penalty.

If the Progressives continue this trend of circumventing Trial by Jury for those who do not comply with their 2,000 page laws, then there will soon be justification for Patriots to Restore the Rule of Law against the usurpers of the Republic.

 

[KNB]

But seriously, when are all the 140m gun pussies going to use their second amendment rights to defend any other American rights that have been taken away?

Armed revolution is not justified unless:

1) Trial by Jury has been abolished/suspended/usurped.

No President/Governor/Executive can imprison an acquitted man. No Judge can overturn an acquittal, and no Legislative Body can pass a Bill of Attainder to override a decision by a Jury.

So long as Trial by Jury remains, the People only have THEMSELVES to blame for tyrannical abusing themselves, because only THE PEOPLE, you peers, can punish you.

2) Confiscation of Firearms.

The moment the People lose their firearms, then they will be unable to resist the usurpation of Trial by Jury.


------------------------------------------------------------------

Now let's bear in mind that the Obamacare penalty is immune to review by a Jury of your Peers, because the Supreme Snort declared it a tax --- a tax that shall only be paid when you violate the law --- also known as a penalty.

Trial by jury has already been suspended. When does your revolution begin?
American drone deaths highlight controversy - U.S. News

 

[Victory67]

If there is an owner, the owner should have to consent.

If its a rental, any tenant on the lease can consent.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If there is an owner, the owner should have to consent.

If its a rental, any tenant on the lease can consent.

The question put before the Court was , do the police have authority to search a property if one of the people who live there grants permission even if another as previously said no.

My opinion is that once permission is granted later by another person that has legal standing to do so, then the police may freely search. Any other decision would have made for he said she said and jeopardize the States interest and would in effect nullify the rights of the person granting permission.

You don't want your property searched make sure your partner knows that. And then don't piss them off.

 

[OKTexas]

No brainer ruling, if they have permission, they have permission.

I disagree, they could have done the search pursuant to the arrest, but once they left, a warrant should have been obtained. If it took an hour to get back I'd say there was no concern for evidence being destroyed. The courts have been consistently widening the interpretations of the bill of rights, giving the government more power, it needs to stop.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No brainer ruling, if they have permission, they have permission.

I disagree, they could have done the search pursuant to the arrest, but once they left, a warrant should have been obtained. If it took an hour to get back I'd say there was no concern for evidence being destroyed. The courts have been consistently widening the interpretations of the bill of rights, giving the government more power, it needs to stop.

The courts like the cops. Either hide your shit well or love alone. You've been warned eh?

 

[Politico]

But seriously, when are all the 140m gun pussies going to use their second amendment rights to defend any other American rights that have been taken away?

Armed revolution is not justified unless:

1) Trial by Jury has been abolished/suspended/usurped.

No President/Governor/Executive can imprison an acquitted man. No Judge can overturn an acquittal, and no Legislative Body can pass a Bill of Attainder to override a decision by a Jury.

So long as Trial by Jury remains, the People only have THEMSELVES to blame for tyrannical abusing themselves, because only THE PEOPLE, you peers, can punish you.

2) Confiscation of Firearms.

The moment the People lose their firearms, then they will be unable to resist the usurpation of Trial by Jury.


------------------------------------------------------------------

Now let's bear in mind that the Obamacare penalty is immune to review by a Jury of your Peers, because the Supreme Snort declared it a tax --- a tax that shall only be paid when you violate the law --- also known as a penalty.

Trial by jury has already been suspended. When does your revolution begin?
American drone deaths highlight controversy - U.S. News

And plenty of folks are locked up without trials. But let's not worry about those pesky details.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

But seriously, when are all the 140m gun pussies going to use their second amendment rights to defend any other American rights that have been taken away?

Armed revolution is not justified unless:

1) Trial by Jury has been abolished/suspended/usurped.

No President/Governor/Executive can imprison an acquitted man. No Judge can overturn an acquittal, and no Legislative Body can pass a Bill of Attainder to override a decision by a Jury.

So long as Trial by Jury remains, the People only have THEMSELVES to blame for tyrannical abusing themselves, because only THE PEOPLE, you peers, can punish you.

2) Confiscation of Firearms.

The moment the People lose their firearms, then they will be unable to resist the usurpation of Trial by Jury.


------------------------------------------------------------------

Now let's bear in mind that the Obamacare penalty is immune to review by a Jury of your Peers, because the Supreme Snort declared it a tax --- a tax that shall only be paid when you violate the law --- also known as a penalty.

Trial by jury has already been suspended. When does your revolution begin?
American drone deaths highlight controversy - U.S. News

Are you claiming that Trial by Jury has been suspended en masse?

 

[KissMy]

But seriously, when are all the 140m gun pussies going to use their second amendment rights to defend any other American rights that have been taken away?

Armed revolution is not justified unless:

1) Trial by Jury has been abolished/suspended/usurped.

No President/Governor/Executive can imprison an acquitted man. No Judge can overturn an acquittal, and no Legislative Body can pass a Bill of Attainder to override a decision by a Jury.

So long as Trial by Jury remains, the People only have THEMSELVES to blame for tyrannical abusing themselves, because only THE PEOPLE, you peers, can punish you.

2) Confiscation of Firearms.

The moment the People lose their firearms, then they will be unable to resist the usurpation of Trial by Jury.


------------------------------------------------------------------

Now let's bear in mind that the Obamacare penalty is immune to review by a Jury of your Peers, because the Supreme Snort declared it a tax --- a tax that shall only be paid when you violate the law --- also known as a penalty.

If the Progressives continue this trend of circumventing Trial by Jury for those who do not comply with their 2,000 page laws, then there will soon be justification for Patriots to Restore the Rule of Law against the usurpers of the Republic.

The police now have MRAP's, Body Armor, robots, tear gas, drones & air support that us civilians are not allowed to have. In Ferguson you saw how useless guns & Molotov cocktails were against police. Suicide bombers & large neighborhood destroying IEDs are the best defense civilians have left against these police state jackbooted thugs.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

The police now have MRAP's, Body Armor, robots, tear gas, drones & air support that us civilians are not allowed to have. In Ferguson you saw how useless guns & Molotov cocktails were against police. Suicide bombers & large neighborhood destroying IEDs are the best defense civilians have left against these police state jackbooted thugs.

You vastly overestimate the real-life power of these technologies.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com

WASHINGTON — Police officers may enter and search a home without a warrant as long as one occupant consents, even if another resident has previously objected, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in a Los Angeles case.

The 6-3 ruling, triggered by a Los Angeles Police Department arrest in 2009, gives authorities more leeway to search homes without obtaining a warrant, even when there is no emergency.

Supreme Court ruling expands police authority in home searches - latimes.com

I'd blame it on being Commiefornia, but this is the Federal Supreme Snort of the United Crack Federation.

This is good news for an abused wife who's husband won't let the cops in the door.