Supreme Court rules for South Carolina in its bid to defund Planned Parenthood

g5000

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
138,796
Reaction score
92,682
Points
2,605
Outstanding. About time.

The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled for South Carolina in its effort to defund Planned Parenthood, concluding that individual Medicaid patients cannot sue to enforce their right to pick a medical provider.

The court held in a 6-3 ruling along ideological lines, with the conservative justices in the majority, that the federal law in question does not allow people who are enrolled in the Medicaid program to file such claims against the state.


The ruling written by Justice Neil Gorsuch is a boost to the state's effort to prevent Planned Parenthood from receiving funding through Medicaid, a federal program for low-income people that is administered by the states, because it prevents individual patients from enforcing their right to choose their preferred health care provider. The ruling could also give a boost to other Republican-led states that choose to follow suit.

“Congress knows how to give a grantee clear and unambiguous notice that, if it accepts federal funds, it may face private suits asserting an individual right to choose a medical provider,” Gorsuch wrote.

But, he added, “that is not the law we have.”

Federal funding for abortion is already banned, but conservatives have long targeted funding for Planned Parenthood, which provides reproductive health services, including abortions where allowed, even when that money is for other health care-related services.

They argue that even non-abortion-related funding that flows to Planned Parenthood would help it carry out its broader agenda that favors abortion rights.



Money is fungible.

I would prefer the pro-life movement set up identical clinics across the street from every Planned Parenthood clinic, without offering abortions.

I have donated to such clinics here and there, but there aren't nearly enough of them.

It would be hilarious if South Carolina did not withhold Medicaid funds from the pro-life clinics and denied those funds to Planned Parenthood.

In that way, the pro-life movement would grow and flourish.



 
Last edited:
There are several other abortion clinics in South Carolina other than Planned Parenthood. I cannot find the Governor's executive order to confirm he did not specify Planned Parenthood but all abortion clinics.

The media just quotes a piece which says “payment of taxpayer funds to abortion clinics, for any purpose, results in the subsidy of abortion and the denial of the right to life.”

That sounds like all abortion clinics, not just PP.

The South Carolina Department of Health provides all the same services for women sans abortions.
 
Outstanding. About time.

The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled for South Carolina in its effort to defund Planned Parenthood, concluding that individual Medicaid patients cannot sue to enforce their right to pick a medical provider.

The court held in a 6-3 ruling along ideological lines, with the conservative justices in the majority, that the federal law in question does not allow people who are enrolled in the Medicaid program to file such claims against the state.


The ruling written by Justice Neil Gorsuch is a boost to the state's effort to prevent Planned Parenthood from receiving funding through Medicaid, a federal program for low-income people that is administered by the states, because it prevents individual patients from enforcing their right to choose their preferred health care provider. The ruling could also give a boost to other Republican-led states that choose to follow suit.

“Congress knows how to give a grantee clear and unambiguous notice that, if it accepts federal funds, it may face private suits asserting an individual right to choose a medical provider,” Gorsuch wrote.

But, he added, “that is not the law we have.”

Federal funding for abortion is already banned, but conservatives have long targeted funding for Planned Parenthood, which provides reproductive health services, including abortions where allowed, even when that money is for other health care-related services.

They argue that even non-abortion-related funding that flows to Planned Parenthood would help it carry out its broader agenda that favors abortion rights.



Money is fungible.

I would prefer the pro-life movement set up identical clinics across the street from every Planned Parenthood clinic, without offering abortions.

I have donated to such clinics here and there, but there aren't nearly enough
Looks like you support unplanned parenthood or extra kids from parents who cannot afford them. Is that wise? Many of these unwanted kids will grow up with little financial support and turn to robbery or even violent crimes.
 
Another great win! :clap: :clap: :clap:

EAT IT RAW PLANNED PARENTHOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom