martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 94,593
- 44,849
- 2,300
Looks like the court just made it easier to prove so called "reverse discrimination", making the same as regular discrimination.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/05/politics/supreme-court-reverse-discrimination-suits
In this situation the law was clear even if the issue was contentious.
Also, read into the rest of the cases released today, a lot of reversals, most of them unanimous.
This may be the court telling lower courts to stop making things up.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/05/politics/supreme-court-reverse-discrimination-suits
The Supreme Court on Thursday sided with a straight woman in Ohio who filed a “reverse discrimination” lawsuit against her employer when her gay boss declined to promote her. The ruling will make it easier to file such suits in some parts of the country.
Despite the politically divisive debate playing out over workplace diversity efforts – a fight that has been fueled by President Donald Trump – a unanimous coalition of conservative and liberal justices were in the majority. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote the opinion for the court.
In this situation the law was clear even if the issue was contentious.
Also, read into the rest of the cases released today, a lot of reversals, most of them unanimous.
This may be the court telling lower courts to stop making things up.