Stormy Daniels cleared Trump from crimes

[Faun]

name one

Andrew Weissmann

 

[Faun]

You did not need to derail it.

The one trying to derail the thread is you, injecting unrelated material into the discussion.

 

[Robert W]

Then you should follow the sequence.

Daniels didn't approach Trump.

Testimony was she went to the media through her lawyer. Her lawyer contacted AMI to purchase the story. It went to Pecker (CEO of AMI) that contacted the campaign. Then Cohen contacted her.

She didn't threaten the campaign, she went to the media.

WW

The first action was by Daniels. As you claim, she wanted cash for her story. And she then extorted the one man who would pay her, Cohen.

 

[jc456]

Andrew Weissmann

post a link with him saying it.

 

[Faun]

what's the crime?

You should have been paying attention when that was discussed on here.

 

[Robert W]

I don't expect him to be found guilty. I've said that all along. So I won't be shocked and I'll accept whatever the jury decides. Will you if they find him guilty?

We have nothing at stake. If Trump is found guilty no doubt he will appeal.

 

[jc456]

You should have been paying attention when that was discussed on here.

I was, but see you cucks are all about wash rinse repeat. I assumed we're back on repeat.

 

[Faun]

post a link with him saying it.

Donald Trumpâs Trial of the Century

Manhattan prosecutors have argued that the Stormy Daniels case—the first criminal trial of a former President in American history—is about much more than hush money. And legal experts believe that a conviction is likely.

www.newyorker.com

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

stormy did not clear Orange Man Bad from campaign finance crimes.

 

[Faun]

We have nothing at stake. If Trump is found guilty no doubt he will appeal.

Not what I asked you. My actual question was will you accept a guilty verdict?

 

[jc456]

Donald Trumpâs Trial of the Century

Manhattan prosecutors have argued that the Stormy Daniels case—the first criminal trial of a former President in American history—is about much more than hush money. And legal experts believe that a conviction is likely.

www.newyorker.com

He's a law professor, and part of Mueller team. what a stupid cuck you are.

 

[Faun]

I was, but see you cucks are all about wash rinse repeat. I assumed we're back on repeat.

You wouldn't have asked such a stupid question had you been paying attention.

 

[Faun]

He's a law professor,

LOL

Retard, he's also an attorney.

 

[jc456]

LOL

Retard, he's also an attorney.

doesn't say that in your link

 

[jc456]

You wouldn't have asked such a stupid question had you been paying attention.

always a demofk cuck comment.

stormy did not clear Orange Man Bad from campaign finance crimes.

she didn't make him look guilty, and she hasn't played a judge yet from a stay at a Holiday Inn Express

 

[Faun]

doesn't say that in your link

So? That article also doesn't say you're a cretin but we all know you are anyway.

 

[Robert W]

Not what I asked you. My actual question was will you accept a guilty verdict?

We discussed that. My god, I am not a party in this. Does not matter one bit if I accept it or not. It will matter to Trump.

 

[jc456]

So? That article also doesn't say you're a cretin but we all know you are anyway.

it says something about a law professor who worked with Mueller. And his voice is nothing.

 

[Robert W]

always a demofk cuck comment.

she didn't make him look guilty, and she hasn't played a judge yet from a stay at a Holiday Inn Express

Here is a major problem. Who makes Crimes? Democrats have made crimes since the time of FDR. FDR introduced them to making crimes.
Before Democrats deny this, they make the laws. They have managed law making for almost every year of my life and I am 85.

 

[Faun]

We discussed that. My god, I am not a party in this. Does not matter one bit if I accept it or not. It will matter to Trump.

LOL

I also didn't ask if it matters if you accept it or not. Such a simple question and you won't answer it. No worries, your fear answered for you.