State Senate approves blocking U.S. gun laws

[asaratis]

The Arkansas Senate has passed a bill to protect the 2nd Amendment rights of its citizens from being taken away by federal gun restrictions. In the article, the pertinent text of the legislation is quite simple and easily understood. It precludes the LEO in Arkansas from cooperating with federal authorities in the enforcement of any related federal restrictions (infringements) affecting our constitutional right to bear arms.

Kudos to Arkansas! I hope more states pass similar legislation. Apparently 10 states already have done so.

State Senate approves blocking U.S. gun laws | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Legislation that would block local law enforcement officials from enforcing certain federal gun laws and regulations handily won the approval of the Arkansas Senate on Wednesday afternoon.

www.arkansasonline.com

Here is some text from the bill:

"All acts, law, orders, rules, and regulations of the United States Government, whether past, present, or future, that infringe on the people's right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and Arkansas Constitution, Article 2, [Section] 5, are invalid in this state, shall not be recognized by this state, are specifically rejected by this state, and shall be considered null and void and of no effect in this state."

It would prohibit any law enforcement agencies in the state from cooperating with federal authorities to enforce federal gun law, executive order or federal agency directive that conflicts with protections for gun rights in the Arkansas Constitution or any other state law. Police in the state would be subject to criminal penalties and fines for working with federal authorities in violation of the proposed state law.


Federal laws that specifically would be declared null and void in Arkansas under SB298 include the National Firearms Act, which regulates machine guns and sawed-off shotguns, and the Gun Control Act of 1968, which regulates the interstate sales of firearms.


Some proponents of Stubblefield's legislation said they are worried that the federal government under Democratic President Joe Biden is planning to enact far-reaching gun-control policies and confiscation.


Biden's administration has proposed some new restrictions on firearm ownership, such as requiring background checks for private gun sales, but he has not proposed large-scale confiscation of guns. Recent mass slayings in other states have raised calls for further gun regulation.


Stubblefield told senators that 10 states have enacted legislation similar to his bill.

 

[Moonglow]

So they are wasting time and money on laws that are unnecessary, yeah, sounds prudent.

 

[Auld Phart]

So they are wasting time and money on laws that are unnecessary, yeah, sounds prudent.

So they are wasting time and money on laws that are unnecessary,

D.C. has been doing it for years.

 

[Moonglow]

So they are wasting time and money on laws that are unnecessary, yeah, sounds prudent.

So they are wasting time and money on laws that are unnecessary,

D.C. has been doing it for years.

Sure but why do what Washington does?

 

[Moonglow]

Any law created that violates the laws of the Constitution are automatically null and void.


“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” (Marbury vs. Madison, 1803.)

 

[Auld Phart]

Any law created that violates the laws of the Constitution are automatically null and void.


“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” (Marbury vs. Madison, 1803.)

Any law created that violates the laws of the Constitution are automatically null and void.

So, you're against laws prohibiting Open Carry?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

So they are wasting time and money on laws that are unnecessary, yeah, sounds prudent.

Remember the old motto "Be Prepared". You people have made them necessary.

 

[asaratis]

Any law created that violates the laws of the Constitution are automatically null and void.


“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” (Marbury vs. Madison, 1803.)

That is precisely why the Democrat Party's "For The People" Act is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Screw the Democrat Party and the Biden Crime Family!

 

[Moonglow]

So they are wasting time and money on laws that are unnecessary, yeah, sounds prudent.

Remember the old motto "Be Prepared". You people have made them necessary.

How did I make old mottos of the BSA necessary?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

So they are wasting time and money on laws that are unnecessary, yeah, sounds prudent.

Remember the old motto "Be Prepared". You people have made them necessary.

How did I make old mottos of the BSA necessary?

Your abilities at being obtuse are becoming legendary.

 

[Moonglow]

So they are wasting time and money on laws that are unnecessary, yeah, sounds prudent.

Remember the old motto "Be Prepared". You people have made them necessary.

How did I make old mottos of the BSA necessary?

Your abilities at being obtuse are becoming legendary.

Those were sayings before I existed so you must be mistaken.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

So they are wasting time and money on laws that are unnecessary, yeah, sounds prudent.

Remember the old motto "Be Prepared". You people have made them necessary.

How did I make old mottos of the BSA necessary?

Your abilities at being obtuse are becoming legendary.

Those were sayings before I existed so you must be mistaken.

There are thousands of sayings that existed before me, yet I know them.

"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so."
- Mark Twain

 

[Esdraelon]

Any law created that violates the laws of the Constitution are automatically null and void.


“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” (Marbury vs. Madison, 1803.)

So, you agree that infringement of the Second Amendment is contrary to the clear "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"?
I realize you folks on the Left assume no one would dare stand up to the government but it's about to bite you in the hindquarters. THIS is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.
A couple of the Democrats have sponsored bills that don't just seem unreasonable, they are straight-up worthy of armed conflict.
These states are not forcing the U.S. government to remove any law. They're simply telling the gun grabbers that if they want them, THEY will have to spend the time and money to do the job themselves. You know, EXACTLY like what CA, OR, WA, and IL did regarding Federal immigration laws.

 

[Moonglow]

Any law created that violates the laws of the Constitution are automatically null and void.


“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” (Marbury vs. Madison, 1803.)

So, you agree that infringement of the Second Amendment is contrary to the clear "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"?
I realize you folks on the Left assume no one would dare stand up to the government but it's about to bite you in the hindquarters. THIS is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.
A couple of the Democrats have sponsored bills that don't just seem unreasonable, they are straight-up worthy of armed conflict.
These states are not forcing the U.S. government to remove any law. They're simply telling the gun grabbers that if they want them, THEY will have to spend the time and money to do the job themselves. You know, EXACTLY like what CA, OR, WA, and IL did regarding Federal immigration laws.

Federal immigration laws has nothing to do with the second amendment you idiots thinks you have a monopoly over and then you think you stand up to the govt. when all you do is bitch like a wounded kitty.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Any law created that violates the laws of the Constitution are automatically null and void.


“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” (Marbury vs. Madison, 1803.)

So, you agree that infringement of the Second Amendment is contrary to the clear "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"?
I realize you folks on the Left assume no one would dare stand up to the government but it's about to bite you in the hindquarters. THIS is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.
A couple of the Democrats have sponsored bills that don't just seem unreasonable, they are straight-up worthy of armed conflict.
These states are not forcing the U.S. government to remove any law. They're simply telling the gun grabbers that if they want them, THEY will have to spend the time and money to do the job themselves. You know, EXACTLY like what CA, OR, WA, and IL did regarding Federal immigration laws.

I'm UK right wing, the 2nd Amendment should have been written to include common sense.

 

[Jets]

Seem like a type of nullification...

 

[asaratis]

Any law created that violates the laws of the Constitution are automatically null and void.


“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” (Marbury vs. Madison, 1803.)

So, you agree that infringement of the Second Amendment is contrary to the clear "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"?
I realize you folks on the Left assume no one would dare stand up to the government but it's about to bite you in the hindquarters. THIS is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.
A couple of the Democrats have sponsored bills that don't just seem unreasonable, they are straight-up worthy of armed conflict.
These states are not forcing the U.S. government to remove any law. They're simply telling the gun grabbers that if they want them, THEY will have to spend the time and money to do the job themselves. You know, EXACTLY like what CA, OR, WA, and IL did regarding Federal immigration laws.

Federal immigration laws has nothing to do with the second amendment you idiots thinks you have a monopoly over and then you think you stand up to the govt. when all you do is bitch like a wounded kitty.

...and you're far too stupid to realize when the double standards of the leftists and the Democrat Party are repeatedly exposed.

The 2nd Amendment and our Immigration laws indeed have nothing to do with each other.

The contrast presented in the post you replied to shows that the Democrat Party chooses to insist upon NOT enforcing (constitutional) federal law in their states regarding immigration yet insisting that Georgia and other states enforce (unconstitutional) federal law regarding gun control.

You are indeed STUPID!

BTW, nobody has a "monopoly" over the 2nd Amendment. We ALL (citizens) have the rights that SHALL NOT TO BE INFRINGED.

Please enroll in a remedial school not run by the government.

 

[themirrorthief]

So they are wasting time and money on laws that are unnecessary, yeah, sounds prudent.

mebbe they should borrow a few trillion like the fed