Spanberger chickens out of a CNN debate with Winsome

EMH

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2021
Messages
30,624
Reaction score
18,084
Points
2,788
But she'd love to do one on Fox...





and since she's part of the MSNBC evening line up, that would be a conflict of interest there...




Maybe if John Brennan and Clapper hosted a debate....
 
The scary thing is that the libtards in northern VA will vote en masse for the one who is afraid to debate her opponent.


Spanberger has held steady around 45% in the polls. No question the "government employees" brought in under W's massive left wing big government spending expansion turned the state blue. There's still room to stop her.... except of course, there is the issue of Dominion Voting Machines, and Spanberger LOVES Dominion Voting Machines, because they always "count" just enough for her to "win."
 
They have not changed.

It is who they are. CNN is way beyond the talking heads.


MSNBC is vastly more Pro Israel than CNN is now. MSNBC is CIA/Dem, CNN is homo left wing, and that demographic doesn't support Netanyahu.
 
MSNBC is vastly more Pro Israel than CNN is now. MSNBC is CIA/Dem, CNN is homo left wing, and that demographic doesn't support Netanyahu.
Nope.

Hamas miscalculated the fallout from 10/7.

I wish some of these blue haired cvnts who are protesting were at that EDM concert on 10/7.
 
She's probably scared CNN will ask her about Gaza, and that would threaten the support of her base.
You kidding? The libs are the main ones who hate ISRAEL and the Jews. You’re an anomaly.
 
It should come as no surprise that Spanberger, too, is in AIPAC's enormous pocket with the rest of Congress's disloyal "Israel Firsters"

Even though she has received "only" $400,000 from AIPAC, it's AIPAC's destructive influence on America's policy making that should concern any potential voters whose first loyalty is to America and America's best interests.

What disloyal Americans who are blind supporters of a malevolent foreign government don't realize is that unconditional support for each and every right wing Israeli crime and atrocity is good for neither the US nor Israel's long term best interests.

"How the Israel Lobby Controls US Foreign Policy in the Middle East"

EXCERPT "Israel has been able to get pretty much everything they want in terms of expanding illegal settlements, billions in US foreign aid money, the wanton killing of Palestinian civilians for alleged “self-defense”, and the overall continued genocidal Apartheid occupation of a brutalized population in the prison-like ghettos of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. In other words, the situation as it exists in the occupied territories is neither good for the US or Israel.

If it’s considered important enough to oust a suspected enemy of the State of Israel, orchestrated programs can involve any number of dirty tricks to include black mail, bribery, frame jobs, cyber attacks and, of course, threats to one’s character, livelihood, and even life. Again, it’s all a question of severity and how much of a threat (or rather perceived threat) someone in an established powerful position is to what Israel views as their national interests, i.e. Machiavellian dominance. You can bet that what works well for CIA goes double for Mossad."CONTINUED
 
  • Informative
Reactions: EMH
Democrats like to control their media environment.

Kamala would not even consider going to Austin and speaking extemporaneously to Rogan.

Dems like interviewers to wash their balls.
Correct. Name one tough interview AOC has ever had. There have been none. She even screwed up the most recent softball interview on Gaza.
 
15th post
But she'd love to do one on Fox...





and since she's part of the MSNBC evening line up, that would be a conflict of interest there...




Maybe if John Brennan and Clapper hosted a debate....
I don't know. Sounds like racism to me.
 
You kidding? The libs are the main ones who hate ISRAEL and the Jews. You’re an anomaly.


Spanberger is from CIA. She worked under John Brennan. She is 100% left wing, including 100% "interventionalist" when it comes to Israel.

Hence, the term is "Spanberger Republican" and you are a great example of one...








 
EMH is one of the few Republicans on this forum who is very antisemitic.


"anti semitic" = noticing too much truth

YOU are anti semitic for assuming all Jews are Zionist Fascists. They are not.


107 is a way more obvious hate hoax than 911, and not the first time Israel lied about being attacked from Gaza.
 
Spanberger has held steady around 45% in the polls. No question the "government employees" brought in under W's massive left wing big government spending expansion turned the state blue. There's still room to stop her.... except of course, there is the issue of Dominion Voting Machines, and Spanberger LOVES Dominion Voting Machines, because they always "count" just enough for her to "win."

It should come as no surprise that Spanberger, too, is in AIPAC's enormous pocket with the rest of Congress's disloyal "Israel Firsters"

Even though she has received "only" $400,000 from AIPAC, it's AIPAC's destructive influence on America's policy making that should concern any potential voters whose first loyalty is to America and America's best interests.

What disloyal Americans who are blind supporters of a malevolent foreign government don't realize is that unconditional support for each and every right wing Israeli crime and atrocity is good for neither the US nor Israel's long term best interests.

"How the Israel Lobby Controls US Foreign Policy in the Middle East"

EXCERPT "Israel has been able to get pretty much everything they want in terms of expanding illegal settlements, billions in US foreign aid money, the wanton killing of Palestinian civilians for alleged “self-defense”, and the overall continued genocidal Apartheid occupation of a brutalized population in the prison-like ghettos of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. In other words, the situation as it exists in the occupied territories is neither good for the US or Israel.

If it’s considered important enough to oust a suspected enemy of the State of Israel, orchestrated programs can involve any number of dirty tricks to include black mail, bribery, frame jobs, cyber attacks and, of course, threats to one’s character, livelihood, and even life. Again, it’s all a question of severity and how much of a threat (or rather perceived threat) someone in an established powerful position is to what Israel views as their national interests, i.e. Machiavellian dominance. You can bet that what works well for CIA goes double for Mossad."CONTINUED
I would like to see Sears in the office, but Spanberger has the contacts and money and is as deep state as you can get. This country needs a lot of things but more cia assets in government is not among them.
 
Back
Top Bottom