SOTU Video: President Trump Has Ilhan Omar GOING BERSERK, ALL Dems Refuse To Stand Up When Asked To Prioritize American Citizens Over Illegals

[Clipper]

What buddies? What girls? You seem broke and lashing and thrashing, like a kid caught with his hands in the cookie jar?

What buddies? I already explained to you they're the ones that Trump & his lapdogs at DOJ & the GOP Congress are shielding.

But as usual, you & your craven MAGA cult refuse to accept reality. You're a disgrace & that's putting it mildly.

 

[Delldude]

You claimed the polls had Clinton winning the popular vote by 10 points.

Reality is that the polls showed she was winning the popular vote by 3 points.

Reality is that she won the popular vote by 2 points.

So the difference wasn’t 10 points. It wasn’t 4 points.

It’s one point. Blabbering about the electoral college is completely irrelevant to the point you were trying to make because you aren’t really thinking, you’re just repeating the same shit you’ve been programmed to repeat.

That’s reality.

Kinda dumb ass argument on two counts.

Hillary lost.

And it has nothing to do with the topic.

 

[Clipper]

Not an Epstein thread, Broke Chimper.

You should start a thread on that.

The thread is about the SOTU last night & what I mentionrd is what happened last night.

 

[Dorian Mode]

You claimed the polls had Clinton winning the popular vote by 10 points.

Reality is that the polls showed she was winning the popular vote by 3 points.

Reality is that she won the popular vote by 2 points.

So the difference wasn’t 10 points. It wasn’t 4 points.

It’s one point. Blabbering about the electoral college is completely irrelevant to the point you were trying to make because you aren’t really thinking, you’re just repeating the same shit you’ve been programmed to repeat.

That’s reality.

How is this a claim? From my first post in this series:

"Wasn't Hillary Clinton ahead in many polls by almost 10 points in 2016? Wasn't Harris up about 4 points in 2024?"

First, you obviously can't read and most likely did HS at a Learing Center, because that was a question, not a statement. Secondly, you obviously don't know the meaning of the word "almost." Third, I said 2016, not Nov. 19th. During the summer and early fall Clinton was far ahead in many polls. She ultimately lost. You seem fixated on a question and completely missed the main argument. Let me repeat it for you, since you are obviously mentally handicapped. Republicans are usually under represented in polls. The midterms are not looking good for the dumocrap party. By the way, have you figured out how to get photo ID yet?

 

[Lisa558]

You claimed the polls had Clinton winning the popular vote by 10 points.

Reality is that the polls showed she was winning the popular vote by 3 points.

Reality is that she won the popular vote by 2 points.

So the difference wasn’t 10 points. It wasn’t 4 points.

It’s one point. Blabbering about the electoral college is completely irrelevant to the point you were trying to make because you aren’t really thinking, you’re just repeating the same shit you’ve been programmed to repeat.

That’s reality.

Who cares about the popular vote? That doesn’t count, so candidates don’t run on winning it.

 

[Marener]

Who cares about the popular vote? That doesn’t count, so candidates don’t run on winning it.

You robots are so indoctrinated with your talking points that it’s impossible for you to understand the point being made.

Anytime someone brings up Clinton’s popular vote victory, you automatically, without thinking, make a point about electoral college.

Which has nothing to do with what I was saying.

The allegation made by your fellow traveler was that polls under estimate Republican support by something like 10 points.

Reality is the difference was 1% between polling and results in 2016.

If you want us to believe you’re capable of critical thinking, you need to act like it.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Are you saying that Massie is a child molester?

No, you dumbshit.
Massive would have stood up.
Of course you can't comprehend, just like your dear leader.

 

[Marener]

How is this a claim? From my first post in this series:

"Wasn't Hillary Clinton ahead in many polls by almost 10 points in 2016? Wasn't Harris up about 4 points in 2024?"

First, you obviously can't read and most likely did HS at a Learing Center, because that was a question, not a statement. Secondly, you obviously don't know the meaning of the word "almost." Third, I said 2016, not Nov. 19th. During the summer and early fall Clinton was far ahead in many polls. She ultimately lost. You seem fixated on a question and completely missed the main argument. Let me repeat it for you, since you are obviously mentally handicapped. Republicans are usually under represented in polls. The midterms are not looking good for the dumocrap party. By the way, have you figured out how to get photo ID yet?

Your point that republicans are underrepresented by polls is unsubstantiated.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Wow, that speech last night proved without a doubt. Just how bad you loons hate America.

No, I just hate the treasonous, child molesting, moron running it.

 

[Dorian Mode]

The allegation made by your fellow traveler was that polls under estimate Republican support by something like 10 points.

Are you talking about me? If so, show me where I said that. I said "In general, if a dumocrap is 10+ points ahead they have a good shot. Anything under 5 points and they are in trouble." Learn to read. Then learn reading comprehension. Then you will be able to successfully fill out a form to get photo ID.

 

[Delldude]

L

You robots are so indoctrinated with your talking points that it’s impossible for you to understand the point being made.

Anytime someone brings up Clinton’s popular vote victory, you automatically, without thinking, make a point about electoral college.

Which has nothing to do with what I was saying.

The allegation made by your fellow traveler was that polls under estimate Republican support by something like 10 points.

Reality is the difference was 1% between polling and results in 2016.

If you want us to believe you’re capable of critical thinking, you need to act like it.

Let's keep it off topic.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

This is just fantastic, it's just what we voted for.

And ya gotta love Tlaib's "F*ck ICE" pin, (not censored on the pin.)



There was also a fantastic moment where Trump challenged the entire Dem caucus to stand up when he said we should prioritize protection for American citizens over illegal aliens.

Not one of them stood.


The contrast couldn't be clearer.

It's why former Dems like me finally jettisoned these asylum circus America-hating losers.

And after this epic SOTU, a lot more of us are on the way.

So several years ago democrats decided to kick God out of their party and now they don’t want Americans either.

 

[Dorian Mode]

Your point that republicans are underrepresented by polls is unsubstantiated.

Key things to know about U.S. election polling in 2024

"Confidence in U.S. public opinion polling was shaken by errors in 2016 and 2020. In both years’ general elections, many polls underestimated the strength of Republican candidates, including Donald Trump. These errors laid bare some real limitations of polling."

You are obviously a troll and an idiot. Buh Bye!

 

[Marener]

Are you talking about me? If so, show me where I said that. I said "In general, if a dumocrap is 10+ points ahead they have a good shot. Anything under 5 points and they are in trouble." Learn to read. Then learn reading comprehension. Then you will be able to successfully fill out a form to get photo ID.

Real data shows that polling was off by 1% in the 2016 election.

Your allegation remains unsubstantiated even after you walked it back to the point of irrelevance.

 

[Marener]

Key things to know about U.S. election polling in 2024

"Confidence in U.S. public opinion polling was shaken by errors in 2016 and 2020. In both years’ general elections, many polls underestimated the strength of Republican candidates, including Donald Trump. These errors laid bare some real limitations of polling."

You are obviously a troll and an idiot. Buh Bye!

As your link points out, polling gets far more accurate when Trump isn’t on the ballot

I’m not worried about the midterms because a lot can happen, but the current polling clearly shows that the country isn’t feeling the kind of euphoria that Trump thinks they should.

 

[Delldude]

Can't you people keep it off topic?

 

[Marener]

The real point is that the people who decide the election, swing voters, are most likely to cast their vote based on concrete factors and the characteristics of their local race rather than what Ilhan Omar did or didn’t do.

 

[Auld Phart]

The final RCP average was +3 for Clinton. She won the popular vote by 2.

shame she didn't win the Electoral college.

that is what counts.

 

[Marener]

shame she didn't win the Electoral college.

that is what counts.

You are all indoctrinated robots. None of you are capable of critical thought because you all have the exact same irrelevant pre-programmed response.

 

[Auld Phart]

No, I just hate the treasonous, child molesting, moron running it.

he was replaced just over a year ago.

and he wasn't a moron, just senile.