SOROS EXPOSED-Research on the Progressive Puppet Master.

[Mr.Fitnah]

Day Two: Beck Explains Soros Control Game Plan | The Blaze

 

[Foxfyre]

So no right wing supporters have done anything that Soros has done?

I am unaware of ANY prominent rightwinger with any power who has absolutely set out to destroy somebody as Soros and many of the organizations he finances do. Yes there are some right wingnuts who grasp at any straw to keep conspiracy theories going, etc.--they were rampant during the Clinton administration in their attempts to demonize him--but I am aware of nobody with the clout or power of a George Soros who does stuff like that.

As Beck has said during this weeks series of 'exposes', "Don't believe anything because I tell it to you. Check it all out for yourself." That, in my opinion, is excellent advice re ANY talking head on the radio or TV even though Beck does some excellent research on digging some of this stuff out. I don't always agree with his conclusions. But I admire his ability to dig out the facts from which we can all draw conclusions.

 

[Intense]

Someone needs to clue Stephanie in.....Beck has stated for the record that anyone who takes his show seriously is an idiot.

Id like to see that link.

Ask, and ye shall receive:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/30/business/media/30beck.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1

Disingenuous. There are legitimate arguments against Beck without you having to make shit up. His message on the subject is not to take anything he or anyone else say's at face value, but do your own research.

 

[edthecynic]

So no right wing supporters have done anything that Soros has done?

I am unaware of ANY prominent rightwinger with any power who has absolutely set out to destroy somebody as Soros and many of the organizations he finances do. Yes there are some right wingnuts who grasp at any straw to keep conspiracy theories going, etc.--they were rampant during the Clinton administration in their attempts to demonize him--but I am aware of nobody with the clout or power of a George Soros who does stuff like that.

As Beck has said during this weeks series of 'exposes', "Don't believe anything because I tell it to you. Check it all out for yourself." That, in my opinion, is excellent advice re ANY talking head on the radio or TV even though Beck does some excellent research on digging some of this stuff out. I don't always agree with his conclusions. But I admire his ability to dig out the facts from which we can all draw conclusions.

There is nothing like the blissful ignorance of CON$ervatism.

 

[Intense]

So no right wing supporters have done anything that Soros has done?

I am unaware of ANY prominent rightwinger with any power who has absolutely set out to destroy somebody as Soros and many of the organizations he finances do. Yes there are some right wingnuts who grasp at any straw to keep conspiracy theories going, etc.--they were rampant during the Clinton administration in their attempts to demonize him--but I am aware of nobody with the clout or power of a George Soros who does stuff like that.

As Beck has said during this weeks series of 'exposes', "Don't believe anything because I tell it to you. Check it all out for yourself." That, in my opinion, is excellent advice re ANY talking head on the radio or TV even though Beck does some excellent research on digging some of this stuff out. I don't always agree with his conclusions. But I admire his ability to dig out the facts from which we can all draw conclusions.

There is nothing like the blissful ignorance of CON$ervatism.

There is nothing blissful about your denial of reality.

 

[kiwiman127]

I get emails from various policy groups from both sides of the aisle just to see what each sides talking points of the day are. One of them is Media Matters which I believe Soros owns or contributes to. I find both Fox News and MSNBC rather repulsive because of their blind bias. Secondly, I used to watch Beck when he was on CNN, during those days Beck was somewhat watchable, then he went to Fox News and he decided to get seriously wacky. Beck reminds me of Phil Donahue when he was on MSNBC, I can't believe people can take either one of these clowns seriously.
Anyway, back to Media Matters and Beck/Soros. Below is a from this mornings email. It seems that Beck is doing something that Fox News does regularly, doctor tapes/quotes. Here's the Beck misrepresentation.
-------------------------------------

BECK: I want you to know and remember this: In the last three episodes, I'm not making claims, I'm not asking questions, I'm not telling you statements of fact. What I'm telling you is, watch George Soros in his own words. Where is the country headed? George Soros.

[start video clip]

QUESTIONER: The question is what whether we need and whether Mr. Soros and his foundations can help to bring more foreign influence in the United States instead of relying on what is essentially a balance between Democrats and conservative Republicans.

SOROS: I think you put your finger on a very important flaw in the current world order, and that is that only Americans have a vote in Congress. And yet, it is the United States that basically determines policy for the world. That is a flaw in the current setup.

[end video clip]

BECK: It's a problem for him that people in China or France don't get to vote, find out who sits in Congress. Is it for you? You need to make a choice. Mr. Soros has made his choice. I have made mine. Tonight you decide
<snip>
Below is Soros' real and complete response to the interviewer's question:

SOROS: Look, I think -- I think you put your finger on a very important flaw in the current world order, and that is that only Americans have a vote in Congress. And yet, it is the United States that basically determines policy for the world. That is a flaw in the current setup. I don't think you can correct it by giving the Chinese government a vote in Congress. But it is a flaw, and I think this is where American leadership is needed, to take into account and respect the interests of others as well, in order to retain the dominant position we currently enjoy.

Now, adding the complete quote by Soros certainly changes the entire point Beck was tring to make or actually destroys the poin that Beck was trying to make.

Another scare tactic Beck has used in respect to Soros is that he threw money in an effort to bring down other country's governments. But as noted by Michelle Goldberg in an article for the Daily Beast as shown below:

"Obama is his &#8220;puppet,&#8221; Beck says. Soros has even &#8220;infiltrated the churches.&#8221; He foments social unrest and economic distress so he can bring down governments, all for his own financial gain. &#8220;Four times before,&#8221; Beck warned. &#8220;We&#8217;ll be number five.&#8221;
It&#8217;s true, of course, that Soros has had a hand in bringing down governments&#8212;communist, authoritarian governments. Beck seems to be assuming a colossal level of ignorance on the part of his viewers when he informs them, &#8220;Along with currencies, Soros also collapses regimes. With his Open Society Fund&#8230; Soros has helped fund the Velvet Revolution in the Czech Republic, the Orange Revolution in the Ukraine, the Rose Revolution in Georgia. He also helped to engineer coups in Slovakia, Croatia, and Yugoslavia. So what is his target now? Us. America.&#8221;

Beck&#8217;s implication is that there was something sinister in Soros&#8217; support for anti-communist civil society organizations in the former Soviet Union. Further, he sees such support as evidence that Soros will engineer a communist coup here in the United States. This kind of thinking only makes sense within the conspiratorial mind-set of classic anti-Semitism, in which Jews threaten all governments equally. And as a wealthy Jew with a distinct Eastern European accent, Soros is a perfect target for such theories.
=========================
And to think people eat that Beck's scare tactics right up. It kinda shows how easily some people brainwashed and dumbed down.
And this just doesn't happen on the right, the left is also guilty as hell for doing the same thing.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

See.
Beck the anti semite.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

links in article

SNIP:
Comrade Atkins Admits Communist Infiltration of Democratic Party
This blog has long contended that the Communist Party USA and other Marxist groups have heavily infiltrated the Democratic Party.

This has enabled the Communist Party to both influence Democratic Party policy and to choose and promote Democratic candidates at all levels.



Writing on the Party website Political Affairs, comrade C.J. Atkins admits that Communists indeed do work inside the Democratic Party, including on state level policy committees.

Comrade Atkins also admits that Party members work in in Democratic-aligned organizations including Organize for America, Progressive Democrats of America, the Campaign for America’s Future or the New York Working Families Party.

The context here is that Atkins believes that the Party is stigmatized by the "communist" label and should drop the name, in order to more easily and effectively work through the Democrats and other "mainstream" organizations.
Forces on the progressive left must organize as currents within the orbit of the Democratic Party, but as elements separate from it. This is the stance taken by the organized labor movement. And, if the CPUSA is honest with itself, we would see that this is an approach which we have already taken for quite some time as well. Our members participate in the Democratic primary process at the local level, volunteer in GOTV (Get Out The Vote) efforts, and many take part in the platform-drafting process in their local Democratic committees. More participate in Democratic-aligned outfits such as Organize for America, Progressive Democrats of America, or the Campaign for America’s Future.

However, by not formally affiliating with the Democratic Party organizationally (though many members do individually), the CPUSA and some of these other left formations are able to maintain the independence that allows them to join in the mass coalition efforts to defeat the ultra right without endorsing or accepting the corporate influence and control that prevails among too many top Democratic policy-makers.

All of this is to say, we have to consider the possibility that our current practice, which is broadly in agreement with the understanding of political independence summarized above, may not best be served by our continued adherence to a specifically party-type of organization. I would suggest that we ponder whether it may be appropriate to drop not only the “communist” half of our title, but the “party” half as well.

It is my belief that we could be more effectual operating as a socialist and working-class political organization which does not present itself as a “party” as such. By doing so, we could eliminate the ambiguities and confusion which sometimes arises when CPUSA members run as Democratic or independent candidates. Our members can freely participate in the Democratic Party process, with the Working Families Party or other independent political formations, etc. as appropriate to the circumstances and in accordance with collective judgment of the situation. The details of what such an organization would look like would of course have to be discussed in greater detail by the party as a whole, but it is a transformation worth considering.

READ THE REST HERE.
New Zeal: Comrade Atkins Admits Communist Infiltration of Democratic Party

Wow, what a surprise!

 

[KissMy]

Bad logic. George Soros was also a business associate of George W. Bush and a friend of George H. W. Bush. Does that mean that Soros, who became the Big Bad of Fox in 2004, was "in bed" with GWB? A clue from a conservative . . . . turn off Fox. They aren't conservative, and they're lying to you.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DuafAqAHrc"]Soros Compares President Bush To Nazis[/ame]

So how exactly how did MSNBC convince you Soros was in bed with GWB?

 

[taichiliberal]

Id like to see that link.

Ask, and ye shall receive:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/30/business/media/30beck.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1

Disingenuous. There are legitimate arguments against Beck without you having to make shit up. His message on the subject is not to take anything he or anyone else say's at face value, but do your own research.

You must be INTENSE-ly smoking crack, because the link I put to the NY Times QUOTES Beck. Got that bunky? IT'S BECK'S OWN WORDS IN CORRECT CONTEXT. His quote appears in numerous legit newspapers, magazines.....if it were incorrect, Beck's bosses would have had their legal team demand a retraction, and Beck would have railed about being slandered from his media bully pulpit. To date, that hasn't happened.

The only thing disingenuous here is your pretending that Beck's quote doesn't exist. Don't get pissed at me because Beck played you for a fool and publically called you an idiot.....blame Beck for that.

 

[taichiliberal]

I get emails from various policy groups from both sides of the aisle just to see what each sides talking points of the day are. One of them is Media Matters which I believe Soros owns or contributes to. I find both Fox News and MSNBC rather repulsive because of their blind bias. Secondly, I used to watch Beck when he was on CNN, during those days Beck was somewhat watchable, then he went to Fox News and he decided to get seriously wacky. Beck reminds me of Phil Donahue when he was on MSNBC, I can't believe people can take either one of these clowns seriously.
Anyway, back to Media Matters and Beck/Soros. Below is a from this mornings email. It seems that Beck is doing something that Fox News does regularly, doctor tapes/quotes. Here's the Beck misrepresentation.
-------------------------------------

BECK: I want you to know and remember this: In the last three episodes, I'm not making claims, I'm not asking questions, I'm not telling you statements of fact. What I'm telling you is, watch George Soros in his own words. Where is the country headed? George Soros.

[start video clip]

QUESTIONER: The question is what whether we need and whether Mr. Soros and his foundations can help to bring more foreign influence in the United States instead of relying on what is essentially a balance between Democrats and conservative Republicans.

SOROS: I think you put your finger on a very important flaw in the current world order, and that is that only Americans have a vote in Congress. And yet, it is the United States that basically determines policy for the world. That is a flaw in the current setup.

[end video clip]

BECK: It's a problem for him that people in China or France don't get to vote, find out who sits in Congress. Is it for you? You need to make a choice. Mr. Soros has made his choice. I have made mine. Tonight you decide
<snip>
Below is Soros' real and complete response to the interviewer's question:

SOROS: Look, I think -- I think you put your finger on a very important flaw in the current world order, and that is that only Americans have a vote in Congress. And yet, it is the United States that basically determines policy for the world. That is a flaw in the current setup. I don't think you can correct it by giving the Chinese government a vote in Congress. But it is a flaw, and I think this is where American leadership is needed, to take into account and respect the interests of others as well, in order to retain the dominant position we currently enjoy.

Now, adding the complete quote by Soros certainly changes the entire point Beck was tring to make or actually destroys the poin that Beck was trying to make.

Another scare tactic Beck has used in respect to Soros is that he threw money in an effort to bring down other country's governments. But as noted by Michelle Goldberg in an article for the Daily Beast as shown below:

"Obama is his “puppet,” Beck says. Soros has even “infiltrated the churches.” He foments social unrest and economic distress so he can bring down governments, all for his own financial gain. “Four times before,” Beck warned. “We’ll be number five.”
It’s true, of course, that Soros has had a hand in bringing down governments—communist, authoritarian governments. Beck seems to be assuming a colossal level of ignorance on the part of his viewers when he informs them, “Along with currencies, Soros also collapses regimes. With his Open Society Fund… Soros has helped fund the Velvet Revolution in the Czech Republic, the Orange Revolution in the Ukraine, the Rose Revolution in Georgia. He also helped to engineer coups in Slovakia, Croatia, and Yugoslavia. So what is his target now? Us. America.”

Beck’s implication is that there was something sinister in Soros’ support for anti-communist civil society organizations in the former Soviet Union. Further, he sees such support as evidence that Soros will engineer a communist coup here in the United States. This kind of thinking only makes sense within the conspiratorial mind-set of classic anti-Semitism, in which Jews threaten all governments equally. And as a wealthy Jew with a distinct Eastern European accent, Soros is a perfect target for such theories.
=========================
And to think people eat that Beck's scare tactics right up. It kinda shows how easily some people brainwashed and dumbed down.
And this just doesn't happen on the right, the left is also guilty as hell for doing the same thing.

It's not so much brainwashing of Beck's fans as it's a strong willful ignorance on their part. Beck tells them what they want to hear....facts and logic be damned. Beck gets rich off of his loyal "idiots" (his description, not mine). But the truth has a nasty way of getting out.

 

[edthecynic]

I am unaware of ANY prominent rightwinger with any power who has absolutely set out to destroy somebody as Soros and many of the organizations he finances do. Yes there are some right wingnuts who grasp at any straw to keep conspiracy theories going, etc.--they were rampant during the Clinton administration in their attempts to demonize him--but I am aware of nobody with the clout or power of a George Soros who does stuff like that.

As Beck has said during this weeks series of 'exposes', "Don't believe anything because I tell it to you. Check it all out for yourself." That, in my opinion, is excellent advice re ANY talking head on the radio or TV even though Beck does some excellent research on digging some of this stuff out. I don't always agree with his conclusions. But I admire his ability to dig out the facts from which we can all draw conclusions.

There is nothing like the blissful ignorance of CON$ervatism.

There is nothing blissful about your denial of reality.

Yet another example of the CON$ervative hypocrisy in the first quote of my sig. CON$ play dumb so they can deny being aware of their fellow travelers like Richard Mellon Scaiffe who spent a tremendous amount of money with his Arkansas Project to destroy President Clinton.

Richard Mellon Scaife - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Richard Mellon Scaife (born July 3, 1932) is an American newspaper publisher and billionaire.
Scaife owns and publishes the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. With $1.2 billion, Scaife, a principal heir to the Mellon banking, oil, and aluminum fortune, is No. 283 on the 2005 Forbes 400.
Scaife is also known for his financial support of conservative and right-wing public policy organizations over the past two decades. He has provided support for conservative and libertarian causes in the U.S., mostly through the private, nonprofit foundations he controls: the Sarah Scaife Foundation, Carthage Foundation, and Allegheny Foundation, and until 2001, the Scaife Family Foundation, now controlled by his daughter Jennie and son David.[1][2] Scaife also helped fund the Arkansas Project, which ultimately led to the impeachment proceedings of President Bill Clinton.
Opposition to Bill Clinton

Scaife's publications were substantially involved in coverage against then-President Bill Clinton.

• Scaife was the major backer of The American Spectator, whose Arkansas Project set out to find facts about Clinton and in which Paula Jones' accusations of sexual harassment against Clinton were first widely publicized.
• In a 1999 series of articles on Scaife and foundations that support conservative causes, the Washington Post named a close Scaife associate, Richard Larry, and not Scaife himself as the man who drove the Arkansas Project[16][17]

Regardless of his role, the project not only accused Clinton of financial and sexual indiscretions (some later verified, others not), but also gave root to conspiracist notions that the Clintons collaborated with the CIA to run a drug smuggling operation out of the town of Mena, Arkansas and that Clinton had arranged for the murder of White HouseVince Foster as part of a coverup of the Whitewater scandal. aide

 

[Rozman]

If it's true that Soros did this to the British currency and others don't you think he would do it to us to destroy this country as we have known it.It would make those on the left very happy to have capitalism destroyed in favor of government run everything with King Obama and Queen Michelle.Thank God we have Beck on our side to watch out for us.....he he he.

 

[Ravi]

LOL I watched a few minutes of Becks show today.

What a distorting fear monger.

He's afraid of the Jooooooooooooooos!

 

[editec]

Hey, when the scam is to control both sides of the debate both sides have to have moneybags to fund the manufactured debate.

Soros, Koch, what's the difference?

Take off your partisan blinders.

The truth shall either set you free or get you imprisoned on killed.

Come to think of it, maybe you're better off remaining ignorant.

At least then, you can imagine that you have a team that's on your side.

 

[Intense]

Ask, and ye shall receive:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/30/business/media/30beck.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1

Disingenuous. There are legitimate arguments against Beck without you having to make shit up. His message on the subject is not to take anything he or anyone else say's at face value, but do your own research.

You must be INTENSE-ly smoking crack, because the link I put to the NY Times QUOTES Beck. Got that bunky? IT'S BECK'S OWN WORDS IN CORRECT CONTEXT. His quote appears in numerous legit newspapers, magazines.....if it were incorrect, Beck's bosses would have had their legal team demand a retraction, and Beck would have railed about being slandered from his media bully pulpit. To date, that hasn't happened.

The only thing disingenuous here is your pretending that Beck's quote doesn't exist. Don't get pissed at me because Beck played you for a fool and publically called you an idiot.....blame Beck for that.

You are the Idiot TiaChu. Beck is Pro Israel, Anti Soros. Nice opinion piece you source, Jerk Off. It must be true!!! It must be True!!!..... Pussy.

GLENN: The other thing we talked about this week was the fact that not only social justice. Social justice means redistribution of wealth. That's what it means. The way Jim Wallis and all of these people on the left mean social justice, they mean redistribution of wealth. Who's going to be on with us in a half hour? Who did you get a hold of? Did you get a hold of Dobson or — Robinson? We'll have James Robison on. He is huge evangelical pastor. He will tell you about social justice. He will tell you about what they mean when they say social justice. So I talk not only social justice but I talk about collective salvation this week. Now, collective salvation is a Marxist idea. Because Marxism is Godless. Do you remember the Soviet Union? It's godless. So what is collective salvation? That Jesus died, sure. But he didn't give you your salvation. Your salvation comes from, if you're an oppressor, if you're a white person, Jeremiah Wright, listen to any of his talks, if you're a white person, you must, to be saved, give up all of your stuff. Now, if the oppressed can rise up and take the stuff from the rich white oppressor, they can provide collective salvation. It puts people in the role of the Messiah and that their salvation is linked to everyone's salvation. So in other words, if they have power, they're going to have to do things that will lead to everyone's salvation. It's imperative because their salvation is dependent on it because we all go together. It's human, serving now the party of human, party of human. That's not the way it happens at the pearly gates. It's an individual thing. I explain this on television. So in other words Jesus dies on the cross because he's a victim. First of all, he chose. But collective salvation teaches that Jesus was a victim. And then the tomb is irrelevant because he rises from the dead, but he didn't do anything. He's not conquering anything. He's still a victim. And we all have to do what we have to do to be able to survive. Okay? To be able to have salvation. We have to force people into it. I said, that's like Jesus dying on the cross. And then what? He comes back, what? I've got to get them Jews. What does the media report? Glenn Beck says Jesus has to come back and get them Jews. No. I'm saying in a perverted world, in a perverted gospel. "Glenn Beck says that Jews killed Jesus. Romans killed Jesus."

PAT: Well, I mean, technically the Romans, yes.

GLENN: Yes, they did.

PAT: Carried out the will of the Sanhedrin. The Jews wanted him executed.

GLENN: Now, does that make me all of a sudden anti Jewish?

PAT: No.

GLENN: That's what they're going to say.

PAT: That's ridiculous.

GLENN: There is no one more pro Israel and more pro Jew than I am. I can't take it anymore. The lies and the bearing of false witness.

Here's the truth, and you are not going to get it from me. You are going to get it, the words of Barack Obama and Jim Wallis and Van Jones, I'm going to play audio for you today that should shake you to your core. This is the reason why they are doing these things. We've been talking about Cloward and Piven and next week I'm going to show you the plan. We found their manifesto and I swear to you, I swear to you this is it. You'll understand it all. But above that is this perversion of religion, this perversion of the gospel of Jesus Christ. That's what it is.

Glenn Beck - Current Events & Politics - Glenn Beck: More sulfur -- Obamacare funds abortions

 

[Intense]

LOL I watched a few minutes of Becks show today.

What a distorting fear monger.

He's afraid of the Jooooooooooooooos!

 

[California Girl]

Hey, when the scam is to control both sides of the debate both sides have to have moneybags to fund the manufactured debate.

Soros, Koch, what's the difference?

Take off your partisan blinders.

The truth shall either set you free or get you imprisoned on killed.

Come to think of it, maybe you're better off remaining ignorant.

At least then, you can imagine that you have a team that's on your side.

Having looked into the Koch boys and Soros, I can tell you the difference - as I see it - is that the Koch boys have not destroyed the economies of countries just to make money. Soros did that.... more than once.

 

[midcan5]

"Glenn Beck spent the past week denouncing the liberal billionaire and philanthropist George Soros as a "puppet master" who is orchestrating a coup "to bring America to her knees."

Given Soros' alleged role plotting to destroy the United States, Beck and his Fox viewership might be surprised to learn that one of Sarah Palin's top aides has been on Soros' payroll for years." Top Palin aide is on Soros' payroll - War Room - Salon.com


Power in America has switched completely to corporations and the wealthy, it probably always was there, but we have our myths and they kept us comfortable. Our Constitution was written to control and manage the mess monied interests create, but everyone forgets that and colonial America was quite simple. Lincoln and Eisenhower saw it clearly. After the Constitution created Government to control money the problem became controlling government. Power loves more power. Common folk could change this but chaos isn't comfortable either, so most go along, living the liberty myth. Joe Bageant tells it well. Joe Bageant and http://coldtype.net/Assets.10/Pdfs/0710.Joe.Doomsday.pdf


"The K Street Project, then, did not arise spontaneously out of the ether. When Republicans in Congress began to inform lobbyists that in return for influence they would have to fire all the Democrats in their firms, they may have broken with long-standing traditions, but they were simply carrying forward politics-as-warfare the way conservative political philosophers have historically understood it. Liberals do not generally have objections to working with conservatives; indeed, having conservatives sign off on any expansion of government adds to the legitimacy of that expansion. But conservatives tend to see working with liberals as corrupting; in the immortal words of conservative activist Grover Norquist, "bipartisanship is another name for date rape." K Street is to lobbying what Fox News is to journalistic objectivity. In the world that contemporary conservatives have brought into being, rules are not applicable to all parties to a conflict. Rules are part of the conflict, and whoever wins the conflict gets to change the rules." "Why Conservatives Can't Govern" by Alan Wolfe


And so it goes.........

 

[Truthmatters]

Hey, when the scam is to control both sides of the debate both sides have to have moneybags to fund the manufactured debate.

Soros, Koch, what's the difference?

Take off your partisan blinders.

The truth shall either set you free or get you imprisoned on killed.

Come to think of it, maybe you're better off remaining ignorant.

At least then, you can imagine that you have a team that's on your side.

Having looked into the Koch boys and Soros, I can tell you the difference - as I see it - is that the Koch boys have not destroyed the economies of countries just to make money. Soros did that.... more than once.

HAHAHAHAHAHAH then you should love him and hero whorship him.

Lets remember YOU are with the people who believe the markets should be unfettered to allow people like Soros to make money however they can.

If you hate Soros for making money in a unfettered market then why do you think unfettered markets are what we should have?