So, what does the Left expect in a Republican Candidate?

[GMCGeneral]

Over the years I've not only been voting, but following politics I've seen how Liberals think a Republican candidate for any office needs to be so squeaky clean, without reproach, and gasp moderate. Yet the DemocRAT candidates always have major skeletons in their collective closets, and they can go so far frootloops radical that they piss off their Conservatives, if there are any left in that party. Then after two defeats by the Mulatto Menace towards decidedly limp noodle milquetoast Republicans, along comes Trump. Now, we all know Trump rubs off on people like 0.50 grit Sandpaper and he's all over the place with his ideology. But one of the key things I like about him is he beat the Democrats at their own dirty game.
I, along with a vast majority of Republicans, are sick and tired of the "lose with dignity" and "work with them" crowd as Democrats are known backstabbers, have always been that way. We want someone who will fight Democrats tooth and nail for the sake of the country.

 

[JGalt]

Over the years I've not only been voting, but following politics I've seen how Liberals think a Republican candidate for any office needs to be so squeaky clean, without reproach, and gasp moderate. Yet the DemocRAT candidates always have major skeletons in their collective closets, and they can go so far frootloops radical that they piss off their Conservatives, if there are any left in that party. Then after two defeats by the Mulatto Menace towards decidedly limp noodle milquetoast Republicans, along comes Trump. Now, we all know Trump rubs off on people like 0.50 grit Sandpaper and he's all over the place with his ideology. But one of the key things I like about him is he beat the Democrats at their own dirty game.
I, along with a vast majority of Republicans, are sick and tired of the "lose with dignity" and "work with them" crowd as Democrats are known backstabbers, have always been that way. We want someone who will fight Democrats tooth and nail for the sake of the country.

They expect to be able to either impeach them or put them in jail.

 

[GMCGeneral]

They expect to be able to either impeach them or put them in jail.

Well, assuming Heels Up wins and the GOP gets the Senate and bolsters the majority in the House, maybe it's time to fight fire with fire.

 

[mamooth]

1. To not be a traitor who is out to end American democracy.

2. To not be a sexual pervert and molester and sick rapey woman-hater.

3. To not be a felon and fraudster.

4. To not be a white-supremacist antisemite.

5. To not be a pathological liar and sociopath.

6. To not be the whiniest little bitch to ever walk the planet.

7. To not be suffering from extreme dementia.

We don't demand much, but the GOP couldn't hit even one of those targets with Trump.

 

[jackflash]

Over the years I've not only been voting, but following politics I've seen how Liberals think a Republican candidate for any office needs to be so squeaky clean, without reproach, and gasp moderate. Yet the DemocRAT candidates always have major skeletons in their collective closets, and they can go so far frootloops radical that they piss off their Conservatives, if there are any left in that party. Then after two defeats by the Mulatto Menace towards decidedly limp noodle milquetoast Republicans, along comes Trump. Now, we all know Trump rubs off on people like 0.50 grit Sandpaper and he's all over the place with his ideology. But one of the key things I like about him is he beat the Democrats at their own dirty game.
I, along with a vast majority of Republicans, are sick and tired of the "lose with dignity" and "work with them" crowd as Democrats are known backstabbers, have always been that way. We want someone who will fight Democrats tooth and nail for the sake of the country.

Q) "So what does the left expect in a Republican candidate?"

A) To see the Republican candidate light up the competition like a big cigar?

 

[candycorn]

At this point, I’d settle for one who is sane.

 

[Votto]

Over the years I've not only been voting, but following politics I've seen how Liberals think a Republican candidate for any office needs to be so squeaky clean, without reproach, and gasp moderate. Yet the DemocRAT candidates always have major skeletons in their collective closets, and they can go so far frootloops radical that they piss off their Conservatives, if there are any left in that party. Then after two defeats by the Mulatto Menace towards decidedly limp noodle milquetoast Republicans, along comes Trump. Now, we all know Trump rubs off on people like 0.50 grit Sandpaper and he's all over the place with his ideology. But one of the key things I like about him is he beat the Democrats at their own dirty game.
I, along with a vast majority of Republicans, are sick and tired of the "lose with dignity" and "work with them" crowd as Democrats are known backstabbers, have always been that way. We want someone who will fight Democrats tooth and nail for the sake of the country.

I remember when they treated "W" like they do Trump today. They kept repeating the mantra Bush was a war criminal and needed to be locked up, etc. And Dick Cheney, he was the ultimate evil as he pulled the strings of Bush into war to help him financially with all his oil investments overseas.

But today? They like Bush and Cheney because Cheney endorsed Kamala and Bush is laying low and trying to hide.

It's all about winning elections and basically nothing else.

 

[pknopp]

I remember when they treated "W" like they do Trump today. They kept repeating the mantra Bush was a war criminal and needed to be locked up, etc. And Dick Cheney, he was the ultimate evil as he pulled the strings of Bush into war to help him financially with all his oil investments overseas.

But today? They like Bush and Cheney because Cheney endorsed Kamala and Bush is laying low and trying to hide.

It's all about winning elections and basically nothing else.

I remember when I supported Gabbard in 2020 and was told she was a Socialist gun grabber. Now the right likes her.

Both sides are nothing else if not hypocrites.

 

[GMCGeneral]

At this point, I’d settle for one who is sane.

Translation into Liberalspeak: A Republican In Name Only that campaigns as a Conservative, but governs like a Democrat.

 

[GMCGeneral]

I remember when they treated "W" like they do Trump today. They kept repeating the mantra Bush was a war criminal and needed to be locked up, etc. And Dick Cheney, he was the ultimate evil as he pulled the strings of Bush into war to help him financially with all his oil investments overseas.

But today? They like Bush and Cheney because Cheney endorsed Kamala and Bush is laying low and trying to hide.

It's all about winning elections and basically nothing else.

Oh, Reagan was routinely pilloried by the Left all the time when he was in office.

 

[Votto]

Oh, Reagan was routinely pilloried by the Left all the time when he was in office.

The Left says they are turned off by Trump's abrasive nature and his lack of character, then they turn right around and trash someone like JD Vance who is the exact opposite of Trump who had a humble beginning and not born into wealth, and probably more like Reagan in terms of his ability to communicate and friendliness. In fact, from the reactions I have gotten from those on the Left, they hate JD more than Trump.

 

[JGalt]

I remember when I supported Gabbard in 2020 and was told she was a Socialist gun grabber. Now the right likes her.

Both sides are nothing else if not hypocrites.

Apparently you know nothing about Gabbard's position on firearms. She was a socialist gun-grabber at one time. But between the idiot Democrats and leftists she turned her back on, and her realization of what a great leader Trump is, she switched her views.

"Gabbard's views on gun control and gun owners' rights have varied through the course of her political career.

During her time in Congress and throughout her presidential campaign, Gabbard supported a common rifle weapons ban and universal background checks.[222] She received an F-rating from the NRA, a 0% rating by the Hawaii Rifle Association and a 100% rating by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence for her time in Congress.[223]

Following her retirement from Congress, Gabbard's positions on gun control and gun owners' rights have slightly shifted to the right.

Gabbard has stated that she is a supporter of the Second Amendment. Gabbard says she believes the Second Amendment is necessary so citizens can "defend themselves and our loved ones, and to serve as a check on a tyrannical government seeking to take away our God-given freedoms."[11][12]

Gabbard expressed approval with the Supreme Court's ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, which held that an individual's right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home is protected by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.[11][12]"

Political positions of Tulsi Gabbard - Wikipedia

 

[BluesLegend]

I've seen how Liberals think a Republican candidate for any office needs to be so squeaky clean, without reproach, and gasp moderate. Yet the DemocRAT candidates always have major skeletons in their collective closets, and they can go so far frootloops radical that they piss off their Conservatives

DOUBLE STANDARDS is the foundation the Dem party is built upon. Realize what lying scumbags Democrats are.

 

[Moonglow]

Over the years I've not only been voting, but following politics I've seen how Liberals think a Republican candidate for any office needs to be so squeaky clean, without reproach, and gasp moderate. Yet the DemocRAT candidates always have major skeletons in their collective closets, and they can go so far frootloops radical that they piss off their Conservatives, if there are any left in that party. Then after two defeats by the Mulatto Menace towards decidedly limp noodle milquetoast Republicans, along comes Trump. Now, we all know Trump rubs off on people like 0.50 grit Sandpaper and he's all over the place with his ideology. But one of the key things I like about him is he beat the Democrats at their own dirty game.
I, along with a vast majority of Republicans, are sick and tired of the "lose with dignity" and "work with them" crowd as Democrats are known backstabbers, have always been that way. We want someone who will fight Democrats tooth and nail for the sake of the country.

I prefer a man like Eisenhower.

 

[GMCGeneral]

DOUBLE STANDARDS is the foundation the Dem party is built upon. Realize what lying scumbags Democrats are.

No need, why do you think I call them BACKSTABBERS?

 

[GMCGeneral]

The Left says they are turned off by Trump's abrasive nature and his lack of character, then they turn right around and trash someone like JD Vance who is the exact opposite of Trump who had a humble beginning and not born into wealth, and probably more like Reagan in terms of his ability to communicate and friendliness. In fact, from the reactions I have gotten from those on the Left, they hate JD more than Trump.

I do see some surprising parallels here. Back during the 1984 campaign, Another Minnesota loonytune, Walter Mondale, picked NYC Liberal Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate. Way to go, Wally don't bother courting Conservatives. Net result was the colossal ass-fucking he got when Reagan trounced him 49 states to 1 and DC.

 

[Lesh]

Chaos

 

[BluesLegend]

No need, why do you think I call them BACKSTABBERS?

Because you are too nice.

 

[GMCGeneral]

Chaos

That's what you get when you have a Democrat party supporting illegal invaders and all sorts of sexual deviants, including pedophiles over Mr. and Mrs. John Q. Taxpayer.

 

[GMCGeneral]

Because you are too nice.

OK, how about FUCKING BACKSTABBING BOLSHEVIK COMMUNIST BASTARDS THAT NEED A MAJOR ENEMA FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS!!!!!