So How Many ….

Status
Not open for further replies.
So much is coming out of the whole thing that is detrimental to the leftist dems I can understand why leftists would try to put it on the backburner.

IMHO it's not even got going good yet as I believe there is a vast criminal conspiracy road to go down yet.
 
Let’s get an over/under going

I say 30

Have we reached that yet?
 
harlie Kirk threads are the mods going to allow?

At this point we need a Charlie Kirk forum

Here's a good thread starter...


FBI deputy director Dan Bongino: “People knew in advance” of the Kirk assassination suspect’s plan.

1758025414041.webp
 
As long as the side that is traditionally against the death penalty for actual violent criminals continues to justify the assassination of Charlie Kirk, there will be discussions about the death of Charlie Kirk.
 
Or maybe the 1/6 threads, how many of those do you think?
 
And this isn't Politics, if you have an issue you're not supposed to handle it by creating a thread in Politics. :dunno:
 
Charlie Kirk threads are the mods going to allow?

At this point we need a Charlie Kirk forum
The forums was actually going to be renamed the "Charley Kirk" forums

No one told you?
 
he is right.....any other subject the threads get merged....
Merging threads is a difficult procedure, and sometimes the forum software doesn't cooperate.

The threads that are posted first have to be within a few days of each other, likewise, they need be in the same sub-forum.

Otherwise, the software is somewhat uncooperative.

It is possible to move threads around to other sub-forums to merge them, that is tedious, and inevitably, someone will get salty about the move.

It just isn't worth the time and effort.

If they started handing out two-week bans if members purposely post duplicate threads when it is obvious they KNEW the thread topic already existed, (i.e. they posted in the other thread before they started their own in a different forum or with a new spin on the same topic - OPs,) it might reduce the habitual offenders from posting new threads on the same topic. . . . I don't see that happen though.
 
Merging threads is a difficult procedure, and sometimes the forum software doesn't cooperate.

The threads that are posted first have to be within a few days of each other, likewise, they need be in the same sub-forum.

Otherwise, the software is somewhat uncooperative.

It is possible to move threads around to other sub-forums to merge them, that is tedious, and inevitably, someone will get salty about the move.

It just isn't worth the time and effort.

If they started handing out two-week bans if members purposely post duplicate threads when it is obvious they KNEW the thread topic already existed, (i.e. they posted in the other thread before they started their own in a different forum or with a new spin on the same topic - OPs,) it might reduce the habitual offenders from posting new threads on the same topic. . . . I don't see that happen though.
maybe get a better forum with better software....just sayin...
 
Charlie Kirk threads are the mods going to allow?

At this point we need a Charlie Kirk forum
Guess Lefty should have thought about the consequences of his actions. You dumb a-holes have turned Charlie into a martyr and have woken up a good portion of the country to your tactics.

P.S. You sound nervous.
 
15th post
Guess Lefty should have thought about the consequences of his actions. You dumb a-holes have turned Charlie into a martyr and have woken up a good portion of the country to your tactics.

P.S. You sound nervous.

It's actually the world -
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom