Smoking Gun: The Dominion Code has been reverse engineered.

Greetings USMB, I am Edward Solomon.

I am going into federal protective custody tomorrow so that I can appear in court unharmed.

I present you this video. Enjoy.


Smoking Gun, Part 2: Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed, net 200,353 votes for Biden

Smoking Gun, Part 2: Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed, net 200,353 votes for Biden



Smoking Gun, Part 2: Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed, net 200,353 votes for Biden in seized precincts in Atlanta. Affidavits signed.

Smoking Gun, Part 2: Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed, net 200,353 votes for Biden

Watch the video. You will know.

Summary: Final hijacked state is 287,424 total votes. 242,434 Biden, 42,109 Trump, Net gain 200,325

Final hijacked state is 14.65% Trump.

All hijacked precincts after release report: 93,327 Trump out of 504,700. That is 18.49%, if we subtract the hijacked votes from the final aggregate state we get: 51,218 Trump out of 217,276, which is 23.57% Trump.

That the final hijacked state of all precincts can have their total votes changed to a uniform number, such as 20,000 total votes per precinct, and the percentage remains the same (14.65%), which is proof that a simple linear algebra algorithm was adjusting requisite precinct totals against a flat polarized template.

The precincts seized more than once were most likely to be early in alphanumeric order, proving the software takes the first available precinct from an ordered alphanumeric list by County, Precinct.

1: There are 371 unique precincts were this investigation. 2: There are 182 unique precincts involved in more than one ratio transfer. 3: There are 217 unique ratios were transferred.

4: That… A: Clayton County has only 2 precincts in multi ratio transfers. B: That Dekalb has 19 precincts in multi transfers. C: That Fulton boasts a staggering 157 precincts in multi ratio transfers. D: That Gwinnett has only 3 precincts in multi ratio transfers.

5: In accordance to the Mothersheet and the original SCYTL and NYT Data, there are 1041 total precincts 6: In accordance to the Mothersheet and the original SCYTL and NYT Data, there are 12681 unique overall ratios.

7: That 1.71% of the unique ratios are confirmed, post analysis and investiation, to be true positives, that no false positives were caught, nor any false negatives ignored.

That of these 1.71% of the ratios, (217/12681), 246 precincts from Fulton are involved (66.30% of all precincts caught), and 71 precincts from DeKalb (19.13% of all precincts caught are involved.

8: That DeKalb has 190 precincts from the original database; that Fulton has 383 precincts on the from the original database. Furthermore that this means 37.3% of DeKalb’s precincts are involved, and likewise that 64.2% of Fulton’s precinctswere involved, and that this “Ratio Transfer” phenomenon does not even occur once in several of the counties in the Mothersheet (Rockdale and Newton), only twice in Henry County, and only 6 times in Cobb, which itself has over 100 precincts (thus less than 6% of its precincts have been flagged. Which is ten times as many less than Fulton’s by proportion)."

9: (Explained in video):

That a distinct Wheel Number of 2231 was found, such that the virtual precincts were divided into 23 branches with 97 leaves; all wheel numbers above 2231 fail catastrophically (with polynomial increases of failure in the immediate range above 2231) until the trivial limit at the highest recorded denominator of 3784 (Fulton Precinct AP01A, November 5th, 21:16 AM).

10: That the fraud is proven by the fact that all hijacked precincts in their final states can be filled with the same number of votes per precincts, and it equals the same flip of trump to total (confirming a live algorithm was balancing the zero point average from a blank template using equal weight on each precinct).

Original Source, Spreadsheets, readmes and images used in video: Gofile Gofile

Use LibreOffice (free) to open the spreadsheets. Download LibreOffice | LibreOffice - Free Office Suite - Based on OpenOffice - Compatible with Microsoft

Resource links: Nsided polygon gen + Atlanta's wheel. https://www.math.purdue.edu/~eremenko/dvi/euler.pdf (0.81)(0.015)(2000^2)(3/(pi)^2) - Wolfram|Alpha Root of unity - Wikipedia Euler's totient function - Wikipedia Limit to Infinity of Summation of Euler Phi Function over Square - ProofWiki

Live Simulation of Ratio Transfer Video:

How to calculate chance of transfer video:

My love for God.

The fate of nation is now in your hands.

We cannot unsee what we have seen.

We cannot unhear what we have heard.

Bump it to the top.

Watch it all.

God Bless the United States, our Republic shall not fall this day.

Honorable mention to all pedes, and our data team (that provided the raw SCTYL and NYT data).

Had I not found this website after the election, I never would have had the clues and reports available to me to start my search. The Grand Unification of Ratio Transfers and Fraction Magic has been made manifest.

I salute all of you Patriots.

Our nation has been saved.

Lincoln Soundtrack | 07 | Call To Muster And Battle Cry Of Freedom

Respectfully, I am quite skeptical of this. At about 9:40-11:00 in your Rumble video (I did not watch the whole thing), where you are explaining in detail the numerical proof, I notice...

- Your spreadsheet has about 10,000 lines.
- You have sorted the columns by vote ratio (and then time), as opposed to time (and then optionally vote ratio, which would be the proper way to do it).

So, it is not surprising that at different times, various precincts, perhaps many, would had the same vote ratio.

Saying that it transfers from one to another does not logically follow. They don't "pick it up," they simply, by coincidence, happen to have a common ratio.

Please feel free to correct any misunderstanding I have. Thanks.


It's within one timestamp or within one hour.

I understand that, but it's not at all surprising to me that one precinct might be reporting vote totals of 16/19, and then a short time later, another might report the same ratio - 32/38 or 128/152.

It might seem surprising to you, or look like proof that the machines are passing ratios between precincts, but it seems to be natural coincidence to me.

Fraud may have occurred, but this does not seem to be a good proof of it.

Regards,
Jim
 
Greetings USMB, I am Edward Solomon.

I am going into federal protective custody tomorrow so that I can appear in court unharmed.

I present you this video. Enjoy.


Smoking Gun, Part 2: Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed, net 200,353 votes for Biden

Smoking Gun, Part 2: Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed, net 200,353 votes for Biden



Smoking Gun, Part 2: Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed, net 200,353 votes for Biden in seized precincts in Atlanta. Affidavits signed.

Smoking Gun, Part 2: Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed, net 200,353 votes for Biden

Watch the video. You will know.

Summary: Final hijacked state is 287,424 total votes. 242,434 Biden, 42,109 Trump, Net gain 200,325

Final hijacked state is 14.65% Trump.

All hijacked precincts after release report: 93,327 Trump out of 504,700. That is 18.49%, if we subtract the hijacked votes from the final aggregate state we get: 51,218 Trump out of 217,276, which is 23.57% Trump.

That the final hijacked state of all precincts can have their total votes changed to a uniform number, such as 20,000 total votes per precinct, and the percentage remains the same (14.65%), which is proof that a simple linear algebra algorithm was adjusting requisite precinct totals against a flat polarized template.

The precincts seized more than once were most likely to be early in alphanumeric order, proving the software takes the first available precinct from an ordered alphanumeric list by County, Precinct.

1: There are 371 unique precincts were this investigation. 2: There are 182 unique precincts involved in more than one ratio transfer. 3: There are 217 unique ratios were transferred.

4: That… A: Clayton County has only 2 precincts in multi ratio transfers. B: That Dekalb has 19 precincts in multi transfers. C: That Fulton boasts a staggering 157 precincts in multi ratio transfers. D: That Gwinnett has only 3 precincts in multi ratio transfers.

5: In accordance to the Mothersheet and the original SCYTL and NYT Data, there are 1041 total precincts 6: In accordance to the Mothersheet and the original SCYTL and NYT Data, there are 12681 unique overall ratios.

7: That 1.71% of the unique ratios are confirmed, post analysis and investiation, to be true positives, that no false positives were caught, nor any false negatives ignored.

That of these 1.71% of the ratios, (217/12681), 246 precincts from Fulton are involved (66.30% of all precincts caught), and 71 precincts from DeKalb (19.13% of all precincts caught are involved.

8: That DeKalb has 190 precincts from the original database; that Fulton has 383 precincts on the from the original database. Furthermore that this means 37.3% of DeKalb’s precincts are involved, and likewise that 64.2% of Fulton’s precinctswere involved, and that this “Ratio Transfer” phenomenon does not even occur once in several of the counties in the Mothersheet (Rockdale and Newton), only twice in Henry County, and only 6 times in Cobb, which itself has over 100 precincts (thus less than 6% of its precincts have been flagged. Which is ten times as many less than Fulton’s by proportion)."

9: (Explained in video):

That a distinct Wheel Number of 2231 was found, such that the virtual precincts were divided into 23 branches with 97 leaves; all wheel numbers above 2231 fail catastrophically (with polynomial increases of failure in the immediate range above 2231) until the trivial limit at the highest recorded denominator of 3784 (Fulton Precinct AP01A, November 5th, 21:16 AM).

10: That the fraud is proven by the fact that all hijacked precincts in their final states can be filled with the same number of votes per precincts, and it equals the same flip of trump to total (confirming a live algorithm was balancing the zero point average from a blank template using equal weight on each precinct).

Original Source, Spreadsheets, readmes and images used in video: Gofile Gofile

Use LibreOffice (free) to open the spreadsheets. Download LibreOffice | LibreOffice - Free Office Suite - Based on OpenOffice - Compatible with Microsoft

Resource links: Nsided polygon gen + Atlanta's wheel. https://www.math.purdue.edu/~eremenko/dvi/euler.pdf (0.81)(0.015)(2000^2)(3/(pi)^2) - Wolfram|Alpha Root of unity - Wikipedia Euler's totient function - Wikipedia Limit to Infinity of Summation of Euler Phi Function over Square - ProofWiki

Live Simulation of Ratio Transfer Video:

How to calculate chance of transfer video:

My love for God.

The fate of nation is now in your hands.

We cannot unsee what we have seen.

We cannot unhear what we have heard.

Bump it to the top.

Watch it all.

God Bless the United States, our Republic shall not fall this day.

Honorable mention to all pedes, and our data team (that provided the raw SCTYL and NYT data).

Had I not found this website after the election, I never would have had the clues and reports available to me to start my search. The Grand Unification of Ratio Transfers and Fraction Magic has been made manifest.

I salute all of you Patriots.

Our nation has been saved.

Lincoln Soundtrack | 07 | Call To Muster And Battle Cry Of Freedom

Respectfully, I am quite skeptical of this. At about 9:40-11:00 in your Rumble video (I did not watch the whole thing), where you are explaining in detail the numerical proof, I notice...

- Your spreadsheet has about 10,000 lines.
- You have sorted the columns by vote ratio (and then time), as opposed to time (and then optionally vote ratio, which would be the proper way to do it).

So, it is not surprising that at different times, various precincts, perhaps many, would had the same vote ratio.

Saying that it transfers from one to another does not logically follow. They don't "pick it up," they simply, by coincidence, happen to have a common ratio.

Please feel free to correct any misunderstanding I have. Thanks.


It's within one timestamp or within one hour.

I understand that, but it's not at all surprising to me that one precinct might be reporting vote totals of 16/19, and then a short time later, another might report the same ratio - 32/38 or 128/152.

It might seem surprising to you, or look like proof that the machines are passing ratios between precincts, but it seems to be natural coincidence to me.

Fraud may have occurred, but this does not seem to be a good proof of it.

Regards,
Jim



Here's a small spreadsheet file so you can see for yourself. Second file does it with 2231 ceiling

First set of columns is the actual reported total votes/trump votes and their ratios from the last report of the hijacked precincts before they were released from the systems control.

Second set of columns is those same ratios using the same uniform total in for each precinct, proving it started from an equally weighted position since it produced the same split Trump to Total overall.

Third set of columns is randomly generated precinct totals, to show you that it fails to produce the same Trump to Total split, thus it can only work for those reported totals or using the same uniform number.

https://gofile.io/d/XyFDxo

https://gofile.io/d/h4n8sm


SHOW LESS
 

Forum List

Back
Top