At first glance, there is no connection between skin color and slavery. But historical facts say otherwise. In white Europe, slave empires were almost always built, and in brown countries, people fought for freedom. The Indo-Aryan civilizations of India and Central Asia were always free and fought against slave empires, Latin America was the first to rise up against European colonizers and defeat them. Now brown California is the most resistant to Trump's fascist regime. and so on. Therefore, there is a connection between skin color and genetic predisposition to freedom, which is confirmed by history.
Skin color and slavery
- Thread starter newrebel
- Start date
Muhammed
Diamond Member
Like most racists, your racism stems from a combination of your ignorance and your low IQ.
You Democratic party of slavery, one drop and Jim Crow supporters are all a bunch of low IQ ignorant retarded dirtbags.
- Thread starter
- #3
My iq is about 120, it's not low
Deplorable Yankee
Diamond Member
We believe that you're a leftist p h d aren't you...
Fucking dumber and more ignorant than a box of rocks
Muslim invasions and rule in India, particularly during the Delhi Sultanate and Mughal Empire periods, involved the enslavement of significant numbers of people. This practice escalated during these periods, with Hindus being specifically targeted for enslavement, and many were exported to markets in Central and West Asia.
Key Aspects of Enslavement During Muslim Rule in India:
- Motivation: Enslavement served as a tool for warfare, expansion, and revenue extraction.
- Sources of Slaves: Warfare was a primary source, with large numbers of civilians and soldiers being captured and enslaved. Resistance to rulers' authority, particularly regarding tax collection, could also lead to enslavement. Economic hardship and the caste system also led some to sell themselves or their children into slavery.
- Forced Conversion: Many enslaved individuals were forcibly converted to Islam. Children of Muslim masters and non-Muslim slave women were often raised as Muslims.
- Trade and Export: India became a significant source of slaves for international markets, particularly Central Asia.
- Treatment and Status: While the status of slaves varied, many faced oppression and hardship. Some, particularly elite slaves of Turkic origin, could achieve high positions within the ruling class.
- Mughal Period: The practice of enslavement continued under Mughal rule, though its extent might have shifted. Some rulers like Akbar reportedly banned the slave trade in their territories.
- Legal Framework: Islamic law (Sharia) regulated slavery, but it also recognized and permitted it.
- Comparison with other slave systems: While comparisons can be drawn between Muslim slavery and other systems like the Atlantic slave trade, there were also notable differences
LuckyDuck01!
Diamond Member
China had Chinese slaves. Japan had Chinese slaves. Muslim nations had black, white and Asian slaves. African black tribes had African black slaves. The indigenous tribes in the Americas had slaves from other tribes, and of course white Europeans had white and black slaves. It was worldwide. It was about power and was considered normal in antiquity. The very first nation to end slavery was Haiti, in which the slaves revolted and took over the country. European countries began ending it prior to other nations and the United States was the only nation in which a government fought a war sacrificing hundreds of thousands of its people, including free blacks to end slavery. That last nation to "officially" officially end slavery was Mauritania in 1981. Why did it take that nation so long? Their stance was that the Quran allowed it. The nations that had the most slavery were the Muslim nations. Brazil was the last European (as it was a Portuguese territory) to end it in the west in 1888. Slavery still goes on "unofficially" in the same region of Africa where it was in the past.
Racism, which is obviously not slavery, still exists all across the globe. Japanese, for the most part, don't like those who are not wholly Japanese. Hindus don't much like non-Hindus and on it goes.
Racism, which is obviously not slavery, still exists all across the globe. Japanese, for the most part, don't like those who are not wholly Japanese. Hindus don't much like non-Hindus and on it goes.
- Thread starter
- #6
here are mixed tribes like the Jews-Pashtuns, they worked and will continue to work for the imperialists. I was talking about the Indo-Aryan tribes. Exceptions only confirm the rule
The Islamic power is actually white. The Arabs are partly mixed, but they come from Europe, in ancient times the Semites were a single chthonic region with Europe. They still hide from the sun. The Indo-Aryans called them "non-solar" - assurs.
Deplorable Yankee
Diamond Member
Yup
leftist p h d
Here's a more detailed explanation:
leftist p h d
Here's a more detailed explanation:
- Indo-Aryan Languages:
These languages form a branch of the Indo-European language family and include major languages like Hindi, Bengali, Punjabi, and Sinhalese.
- Migration and Settlement:
Indo-Aryan peoples migrated into the Indian subcontinent, settling in the Indus Valley and Ganges Plain.
- Vedic Period:
The period following their arrival is known as the Vedic Period, characterized by the development of Vedic Sanskrit and the composition of the Rigveda, one of the oldest Hindu scriptures.
- Cultural Impact:
The Indo-Aryans introduced new social structures, religious practices, and artistic traditions, significantly shaping the cultural landscape of the Indian subcontinent.
- Historical Context:
The term "Aryan" itself has a complex history, originally referring to a self-designation used by Indo-Iranian peoples, and later becoming associated with the Nazi ideology. However, modern scholarship emphasizes the linguistic and cultural aspects of the Indo-Aryan identity, rather than a racial one.
- Cultural Impact:
- Thread starter
- #8
The Chinese enslavers are the Xin and their slaves are the Manchus. They were white. Legends say that the Chinese imperial people were proud of their white skin. The Manchus come from the swamps, they love rice. The swamp tribes are usually white.
- Thread starter
- #9
I said brown, not black
- Thread starter
- #10
This is a lie. Swamp peoples never was indoarians, they was enemies of indoarians
Muhammed
Diamond Member
LuckyDuck01!
Diamond Member
I was pointing out that even in Africa there was slavery between tribes. Twas as old as mankind.
- Thread starter
- #14
Brown progressive humanity did not have slavery
- Apr 11, 2023
- 47,424
- 22,578
- 2,488
People of color were enslavers just like whites.
- Thread starter
- #16
No, slave empires developed only in the chthonic area of Europe and the Middle East, in the area of the white man and his mixture. Brown people were free from slavery.
- Apr 11, 2023
- 47,424
- 22,578
- 2,488
Nope, troll elsewhere. Asian slave empires were much like the ones on Essos that Daenrys overthrew.
- Thread starter
- #18
No, ancient eastern cultures were not slave cultures. The Indo-Aryan Vedas do not contain any information about slavery. Slavery came to the East from the West, the first slave empire of the Western type was created by Sargon the Ancient, when he conquered Sumer. Brown people did not create slave countries, and they always fought with slave owners. Including brown America defeated European colonizers
luiza
Diamond Member
Just over 90% of people are IQ 120 or lower .
That score will not get you into any decent University faculty -- as your posts clearly demonstrate .
- Thread starter
- #20
This can be only in America. In the world as a whole, now more than 50% of people have an IQ below 90, about 10% have an IQ below 70 (by old standards, this was considered feebleminded). Autism is growing like an avalanche. There is no doubt that in the US, IQ is so high because most Americans are brown.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Do You Have Experience In Nuclear Engineering? Check Out These Exciting New Job Openings In Iran- Started by Votto
- Replies: 0
-
The psychology of words: Is being called a king better than being called Hitler?
- Started by Votto
- Replies: 16
-
The Repercussions of Trump v. United States May Finally Be Hitting Roberts- Started by berg80
- Replies: 11
-
