Six SC Justices represent conduct unbecoming of the Supreme Court!

Status
Not open for further replies.

merrill

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Messages
3,030
Reaction score
1,631
Points
928
Six SC Justices represent conduct unbecoming of the Supreme Court!

The GOP and Six Supreme Court Justices are violating the rule of law as in flipping the bird to the rule of law. Must be subject to discipline that removes them for a period of 30 days, then 60 days, then 90 days then removed.
 
Six SC Justices represent conduct unbecoming of the Supreme Court!

The GOP and Six Supreme Court Justices are violating the rule of law as in flipping the bird to the rule of law. Must be subject to discipline that removes them for a period of 30 days, then 60 days, then 90 days then removed.
:auiqs.jpg:
 
Six SC Justices represent conduct unbecoming of the Supreme Court!

The GOP and Six Supreme Court Justices are violating the rule of law as in flipping the bird to the rule of law. Must be subject to discipline that removes them for a period of 30 days, then 60 days, then 90 days then removed.

All your base is belong to us. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Now pick up that can, citizen.
 
Six SC Justices represent conduct unbecoming of the Supreme Court!

The GOP and Six Supreme Court Justices are violating the rule of law as in flipping the bird to the rule of law. Must be subject to discipline that removes them for a period of 30 days, then 60 days, then 90 days then removed.
Says a liberal leftist ? Go pound sand.
 
Six SC Justices represent conduct unbecoming of the Supreme Court!

The GOP and Six Supreme Court Justices are violating the rule of law as in flipping the bird to the rule of law. Must be subject to discipline that removes them for a period of 30 days, then 60 days, then 90 days then removed.
1760347155012.webp
 
Six SC Justices represent conduct unbecoming of the Supreme Court!

The GOP and Six Supreme Court Justices are violating the rule of law as in flipping the bird to the rule of law. Must be subject to discipline that removes them for a period of 30 days, then 60 days, then 90 days then removed.
Let me guess. Thomas, Alioto, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Roberts and Barrett.

Am I right?
 
Six SC Justices represent conduct unbecoming of the Supreme Court!

The GOP and Six Supreme Court Justices are violating the rule of law as in flipping the bird to the rule of law. Must be subject to discipline that removes them for a period of 30 days, then 60 days, then 90 days then removed.

You sound like a pearl-clutching Victorian hahaha
 
Six SC Justices represent conduct unbecoming of the Supreme Court!

The GOP and Six Supreme Court Justices are violating the rule of law as in flipping the bird to the rule of law. Must be subject to discipline that removes them for a period of 30 days, then 60 days, then 90 days then removed.
Not only that, I heard they were colluding with Putin, they had MAGA parents, and Bibi Netanyahu was paying them off.

:laughing0301: :auiqs.jpg: :laughing0301: :auiqs.jpg: :laughing0301: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :ack-1: :ack-1: :ack-1: :ack-1: :ack-1: :ack-1: :ack-1: :ack-1:
 
Six SC Justices represent conduct unbecoming of the Supreme Court!

The GOP and Six Supreme Court Justices are violating the rule of law as in flipping the bird to the rule of law. Must be subject to discipline that removes them for a period of 30 days, then 60 days, then 90 days then removed.
Notice not one example. Perhaps you can ask Kamala how to express a thought
 
" Chewing On Shit Claims Breath Does Not Stink Because They Cannot Smell It "

* Social Liberal Or Economic Liberal *

Says a liberal leftist ? Go pound sand.
An economic libertarian is an economic liberal , and a social libertarian is a social liberal , so to which are you referring ?

The blanket liberal versus conservative paradigm is stupidity of political science and it is causing and has caused mental retardation of us public .
 
" Chewing On Shit Claims Breath Does Not Stink Because They Cannot Smell It "

* Social Liberal Or Economic Liberal *


An economic libertarian is an economic liberal , and a social libertarian is a social liberal , so to which are you referring ?

The blanket liberal versus conservative paradigm is stupidity of political science and it is causing and has caused mental retardation of us public .
The conflict is socialism VS conservatism. Socialism is a failure
 
" Us Constitution According To Pretentious Religious Zealots "

* Echo Chambers In Ivory Towers Of Jurisprudence *

Let me guess. Thomas, Alioto, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Roberts and Barrett.
Am I right?
Those justices weighing in the affirmative for dobbs committed sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments by suspending the enumerated rite to equal protection that requires live birth , and committed malfeasance against title 1 section 8 of us code .

The justices weighing in the affirmative that private vouchers can be used to fund religious education committed sedition against us 1st amendment .

Still waiting to see whether the justices apply the term thereof correctly in us 14th amendment .

The op does not cite a source .
 
" Red Versus Blue Jersey Politics With Orwellian Double Think Lexicons *

* Unscrambling Public Mental Degradation Of Political Science *

The conflict is socialism VS conservatism. Socialism is a failure
The terms authoritarian and libertarian are antonyms in political science , each with respect to government action or lack thereof .

The terms socialism and conservatism both refer to authoritarian actions by government , in that socialism is economic authoritarianism and in that conservatism is social authoritarianism - conservation of government - and neither socialism nor conservatism correspond with libertarian or liberal public policies .
 
" Us Constitution According To Pretentious Religious Zealots "

* Echo Chambers In Ivory Towers Of Jurisprudence *


Those justices weighing in the affirmative for dobbs committed sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments by suspending the enumerated rite to equal protection that requires live birth , and committed malfeasance against title 1 section 8 of us code .

The justices weighing in the affirmative that private vouchers can be used to fund religious education committed sedition against us 1st amendment .

Still waiting to see whether the justices apply the term thereof correctly in us 14th amendment .

The op does not cite a source .
See, I didn't know that, but I got it right anyway. Regardless, the interpretation of the Constitution and therefore your argument falls on them.
 
Six SC Justices represent conduct unbecoming of the Supreme Court!

The GOP and Six Supreme Court Justices are violating the rule of law as in flipping the bird to the rule of law. Must be subject to discipline that removes them for a period of 30 days, then 60 days, then 90 days then removed.

What chew talkin' bout, Willis?
 
15th post
Six SC Justices represent conduct unbecoming of the Supreme Court!

The GOP and Six Supreme Court Justices are violating the rule of law as in flipping the bird to the rule of law. Must be subject to discipline that removes them for a period of 30 days, then 60 days, then 90 days then removed.

Just because weed may be legal in your state doesn't mean you should smoke it all today.
 
The crazy TDS left disagrees with some of the Court's decisions so they want to get rid of them. No surprise. Schumer should be sharing a cell with the guy who admitted trying to assassinate Justice Kav for raising a mob to surround the homes of the Justice when he was unhappy about Roe v Wade.
 
Six SC Justices represent conduct unbecoming of the Supreme Court!

The GOP and Six Supreme Court Justices are violating the rule of law as in flipping the bird to the rule of law. Must be subject to discipline that removes them for a period of 30 days, then 60 days, then 90 days then removed.
Wow, I am really impressed by your exclamation mark!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom