Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,917
- 1,530
OK this oft quoted comment by Justice Holmes is used all the time to give an example that rights are not absolute. We'll ignore the fact that the case before the court at the time had nothing to do with yelling fire but rather was a test of espionage laws in the US in the case U.S. v. Schenck . Schenk distributed pamphlets urging people to ignore the draft and was found guilty of violating the espionage laws .
What most people don't realize is that verdict was overturned 40 years ago in the case Brandenburg v. Ohio. , and that the crowded theater remark was nothing more than judicial dictum and as such has no binding legal authority.
So is it illegal to yell fire in a crowded theater?
It seems not.
Now let's apply this to relevant modern day situations.
If you were sitting in a crowded movie theater to see the latest blockbuster and some idiot ran into the theater shout FIRE FIRE FIRE even though no alarms were sounding would there be a panic or would people be throwing their popcorn at said idiot and shouting at him to STFU?
What most people don't realize is that verdict was overturned 40 years ago in the case Brandenburg v. Ohio. , and that the crowded theater remark was nothing more than judicial dictum and as such has no binding legal authority.
So is it illegal to yell fire in a crowded theater?
It seems not.
Now let's apply this to relevant modern day situations.
If you were sitting in a crowded movie theater to see the latest blockbuster and some idiot ran into the theater shout FIRE FIRE FIRE even though no alarms were sounding would there be a panic or would people be throwing their popcorn at said idiot and shouting at him to STFU?