If Netanyahu wants to attack Iran again, it's more likely that he would target Iran's nuclear facilities rather than their oil production. Here's an analysis of the reasons why:
1.
Strategic objective: Israel's primary concern is Iran's nuclear program, which they perceive as an existential threat. Attacking nuclear facilities would directly address this concern by disrupting or destroying Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons.
2.
Military strategy: Israel has a history of targeting nuclear facilities in the region, such as the 1981 Osirak reactor in Iraq and the 2007 Syrian nuclear reactor. This suggests that they have a proven military strategy for targeting these types of facilities.
3.
International support: Targeting nuclear facilities might garner more international support, or at least less opposition, compared to attacking oil production. The international community has been critical of Iran's nuclear program, and some countries might view an attack on these facilities as a necessary measure to prevent nuclear proliferation.
4.
Limited collateral damage: Nuclear facilities are typically located in remote areas, which could limit collateral damage and civilian casualties. In contrast, attacking oil production facilities could lead to significant environmental damage and harm to civilians.
5.
Economic impact: While attacking oil production would have significant economic implications for Iran, it might not be as effective in achieving Israel's strategic objectives. Iran's oil production is a critical component of their economy, but it's not as directly related to their nuclear program.
Attacking Iran's oil production, on the other hand, might be seen as a more provocative and escalatory move, potentially leading to:
1.
Wider conflict: Targeting oil production could lead to a broader conflict, involving other countries in the region, such as the United States, Saudi Arabia, or other Gulf states.
2.
Environmental disaster: Attacking oil production facilities could result in significant environmental damage, including oil spills and fires, which could have long-lasting consequences for the region.
3.
Global economic impact: Disrupting Iran's oil production could lead to a significant increase in global oil prices, affecting the global economy and potentially leading to widespread instability.
In summary, while both options are possible, targeting Iran's nuclear facilities is more likely if Netanyahu wants to attack Iran again, due to the strategic objective, military strategy, international support, limited collateral damage, and economic impact.
==>It's highly likely Netanyahu will become Israel's hero if the wag-the-dog tactic succeeds. But Iran will surely send the Big Gifts sealed with a kiss 
back to Netanyahu lol.
