Sheriff Raids Home of Anti-Corruption Blogger

[Weatherman2020]

Here in the Age of Obama it's 1938 Germany.


Terrebonne Parish Sheriff’s deputies raided a home Tuesday in hopes of uncovering who is behind an anti-corruption blog aimed at Sheriff Jerry Larpenter and other local politicians.

“Exposedat” is a blog, claiming to be “Terrebonne Parish’s Underground Watchdog”, that started publishing short articles about politicians and their business dealings in June.

The first post titled, “Black Man and a Noose”, outlined a civil rights lawsuit filed against a company owned by now-Parish President Gordon Dove called VACCO, Inc.

Subsequent articles have called into question business dealings and relationships of other top Terrebonne Parish officials, including Sheriff Larpenter and District Attorney Joseph Waitz, Jr.

Tuesday, sheriff’s deputies executed a search warrant on a home in Houma, seizing computers and cell phones, alleging the blog’s author committed criminal defamation against the parish’s new insurance agent, Tony Alford.

The home belonged to Houma Police Officer Wayne Anderson. He denies having any involvement in Exposedat. Deputies took two laptop computers, one of which belonged to his children, and five cell phones.

Anderson is a long-time police officer, formerly serving as a Terrebonne Parish deputy and a New Orleans Police officer.

“I’m not sure if they believe Mr. Anderson is actually the author of such work,” said Matthew Ory, Anderson’s attorney.

The search of Anderson’s home was one of three warrants executed in the Sheriff’s attempts to expose Exposedat, according to Larpenter.

The other two were for computer and Facebook account information.

Exposedat’s Facebook page was created by an account using the pseudonym John Turner.

While Anderson denies any involvement in the blog, even if he did create it, legal experts agree it would very likely be protected speech under the 1st Amendment.

Attorney Mary Ellen Roy said the U.S. Supreme Court has found Louisiana’s criminal defamation statute unconstitutional when it is used “…to punish public expression and publication concerning public officials, public figures and private individuals who are engaged in public affairs.”

Sheriff Larpenter and Alford were pictured together in a Tweet featured on Exposedat’s most recent post three days ago.

When Larpenter was asked whether there is a conflict in him investigating an alleged crime involving himself, he replied, “If you’re gonna lie about me and make it under a fictitious name, I’m gonna come after you.”

Keep reading…

 

[RodISHI]

A hacker explained to me years ago how another persons IP could be used if the hacker new how to do it. I can't recall how or what all is done to do that know but it could be the case so it will be a wait and see.

 

[Weatherman2020]

A hacker explained to me years ago how another persons IP could be used if the hacker new how to do it. I can't recall how or what all is done to do that know but it could be the case so it will be a wait and see.

Doesn't matter. Being critical of government is now illegal here in the Age of Obama.

 

[RodISHI]

A hacker explained to me years ago how another persons IP could be used if the hacker new how to do it. I can't recall how or what all is done to do that know but it could be the case so it will be a wait and see.

Doesn't matter. Being critical of government is now illegal here in the Age of Obama.

It has been this away since at least 1981 that I know of when it comes to making report or complaints about corrupt activities. The only difference now is that "it'' has grown and is by the day getting much worse.