Scotus denies Maxwell.

Well that's odd..............testimony in Congress showed the WH meeting with Obama, Brennan, Comey, etc, conspiring together to use lies and deception provided by the Clinton campaign to smear a presidential candidate.
You left out it was the NSA who intercepted an American talking clandestinely with the Russian embassy (which we had wiretaped)
 
Yes they were, no different than any other pardon. If you don't like it, that's known as 'tough shit'.

If you assault police officers, you don't get a get out of jail free card.
 
Being how they are members of His cabinet.......He is in charge.
That's the point. The president isn't supposed to be sending the DOJ after his enemies list.

That's why they put rules in place after Nixon.
 
Rules that every president followed, even Trump 1.0.

But Trump 2.0 is breaking every DOJ regulation.
 
You left out it was the NSA who intercepted an American talking clandestinely with the Russian embassy (which we had wiretaped)
Had nothing to do with what I mentioned, you forgot to notice that part.

The president isn't supposed to be sending the DOJ after his enemies list.
He doesn't have to directly. Wasn't it rather interesting how Garland just happened to go after conservatives?

What a coincidence.

If you assault police officers, you don't get a get out of jail free card.
Time served plus a pardon....... :biggrin:
 
Wasn't it rather interesting how Garland just happened to go after conservatives?

What a coincidence.


Time served plus a pardon....... :biggrin:
Just like the coincidence that Elliott Ness went after Al Capone, Frank Nitti, and the other bootleggers.
 
Yet the democrats did everything possible and found all the dirt they could dig up but missed the Epstein Files?
Why did you put a question mark at the end? Sealioning again?

For the sake of preserving the ambient, baseline IQ of the thread, I will replace the question mark with a period. So that's your claim.

Careful, poster Delldude is going to cry about your speculation.

So your position is that there is obviously nothing there, but the fat rapist is hiding it anyway.

Makes sense, if you don't think about it.
 
I didn't 'out' a question mark. Question marks are gay now?


My position is how could the party you worship let something of this magnitude go by?
No, your position is that there is nothing there, but the fat rapist is hiding it anyway.

Which is funny.
 
I see that President Trump has left it an open question as to whether he might grant Maxwell a pardon.

I urge him not to do so.

That might leave open a modification of her twenty year sentence via a commutation. And, frankly, I find even that to be problematic.
 
Yep. A question he is letting FOX answer, with their coverage.

Sticking a toe in the water.
Some of the J6 defendants may not have deserved the pardon President Trump gave to them, en masse.

I disagreed with the President on those pardons (for the ones who did engage in assaultive behaviors).

And I would disagree with President Trump, once again, on such a benefit to Maxwell, with one possible proviso.

If she becomes a full and honest witness for the government against any of the participants in the Epstein behavior victimizing minors (if such prosecutions aren’t yet time-barred), I’d say maybe a partial commutation is warranted. Otherwise, not.
 
15th post
I of course did not do that, and of course I have no idea what is in there.
Yet the dems let it slide on by................especially when they held the key.

Or could this fabled list be part of a trafficking investigation possibly?
 
Yet the dems let it slide on by................especially when they held the key.
Let what slide on by?

The files that have nothing in them, as you think?

Again, you're not making sense. This is what happens when you reflexively spout troll lines. You contradict yourself.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom