- Thread starter
- #81
Being how they are members of His cabinet.......He is in charge.And yawl don't blink twice, when Trump gives the AG instructions on who to prosecute and who not to.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Being how they are members of His cabinet.......He is in charge.And yawl don't blink twice, when Trump gives the AG instructions on who to prosecute and who not to.
You left out it was the NSA who intercepted an American talking clandestinely with the Russian embassy (which we had wiretaped)Well that's odd..............testimony in Congress showed the WH meeting with Obama, Brennan, Comey, etc, conspiring together to use lies and deception provided by the Clinton campaign to smear a presidential candidate.
Yes they were, no different than any other pardon. If you don't like it, that's known as 'tough shit'.
That's the point. The president isn't supposed to be sending the DOJ after his enemies list.Being how they are members of His cabinet.......He is in charge.
Had nothing to do with what I mentioned, you forgot to notice that part.You left out it was the NSA who intercepted an American talking clandestinely with the Russian embassy (which we had wiretaped)
He doesn't have to directly. Wasn't it rather interesting how Garland just happened to go after conservatives?The president isn't supposed to be sending the DOJ after his enemies list.
Time served plus a pardon.......If you assault police officers, you don't get a get out of jail free card.

List them please.Rules that every president followed, even Trump 1.0.
But Trump 2.0 is breaking every DOJ regulation.
Just like the coincidence that Elliott Ness went after Al Capone, Frank Nitti, and the other bootleggers.Wasn't it rather interesting how Garland just happened to go after conservatives?
What a coincidence.
Time served plus a pardon.......![]()
Derailing another thread, Gene?Just like the coincidence that Elliott Ness went after Al Capone, Frank Nitti, and the other bootleggers.
Why did you put a question mark at the end? Sealioning again?Yet the democrats did everything possible and found all the dirt they could dig up but missed the Epstein Files?
I didn't 'out' a question mark. Question marks are gay now?Why did you out a question mark at the end?
My position is how could the party you worship let something of this magnitude go by?So your position is that there is obviously nothing there, but the fat rapist is hiding it anyway.
No, your position is that there is nothing there, but the fat rapist is hiding it anyway.I didn't 'out' a question mark. Question marks are gay now?
My position is how could the party you worship let something of this magnitude go by?
Yep. A question he is letting FOX answer, with their coverage.I see that President Trump has left it an open question as to whether he might grant Maxwell a pardon.
Some of the J6 defendants may not have deserved the pardon President Trump gave to them, en masse.Yep. A question he is letting FOX answer, with their coverage.
Sticking a toe in the water.
You just proved there is no there there.No, your position is that there is nothing there, but the fat rapist is hiding it anyway.
I of course did not do that, and of course I have no idea what is in there.You just proved there is no there there.
Yet the dems let it slide on by................especially when they held the key.I of course did not do that, and of course I have no idea what is in there.
Let what slide on by?Yet the dems let it slide on by................especially when they held the key.
If they do or did, why did it get past dems when they had the keys?The files that have nothing in them, as you think?