Science can not even get when life started right

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You keep claiming just because a scientist said something it is true

You shameless, lying little weasel. I have not done that. Lies make baby jesus cry.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You keep claiming just because a scientist said something it is true

You shameless, lying little weasel. I have not done that. Lies make baby jesus cry.

Yes you have you said I was wrong by questioning ANY scientist repeatedly in numerous threads and YES you have said with definitive statements that to question any scientist is wrong and that every theory is not a theory but fact. Real scientists do not state with authority that every thing they say is true nor that every theory is proven.

When ask to provide evidence you resort to statements like " the theory says' Or " a scientist said" And have not given a single piece of evidence. For example the scientific history of man is full of holes and scientists ADMIT it. You claim there is an unbroken chain back millions of years. No scientist claims that. You claim that just because there is a skull that proves that each of the species in question are related, that is simply not true and in the past several of the bones have been proven to be faked or not what was originally claimed. You claim that because I have not seen any ACTUAL evidence to support an as yet UNPROVEN Theory I doubt science and am stuck on religion.

Unlike you I have an open mind and am constantly asking for evidence that you simply lie about misstate or misrepresent. I admit it is POSSIBLE that God created man via evolution You can not will not and refuse to admit there is a God at all. I ask for evidence. You just state dogma.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yes you have you said I was wrong by questioning ANY scientist repeatedly in numerous threads

Never once. Question scientists all you want. But the answers you get will be the evidence that has convinced nearly every educated person on the planet, including those same scientists. But this evidence doesn't convince you. At this point, re: evolution, that's your problem. Keep asking the questions. That's what scientists do every day.

 

[Indeependent]

You keep claiming just because a scientist said something it is true

You shameless, lying little weasel. I have not done that. Lies make baby jesus cry.

Why do you lie?
You always claim such.

 

[Indeependent]

You keep claiming just because a scientist said something it is true

You shameless, lying little weasel. I have not done that. Lies make baby jesus cry.

Yes you have you said I was wrong by questioning ANY scientist repeatedly in numerous threads and YES you have said with definitive statements that to question any scientist is wrong and that every theory is not a theory but fact. Real scientists do not state with authority that every thing they say is true nor that every theory is proven.

When ask to provide evidence you resort to statements like " the theory says' Or " a scientist said" And have not given a single piece of evidence. For example the scientific history of man is full of holes and scientists ADMIT it. You claim there is an unbroken chain back millions of years. No scientist claims that. You claim that just because there is a skull that proves that each of the species in question are related, that is simply not true and in the past several of the bones have been proven to be faked or not what was originally claimed. You claim that because I have not seen any ACTUAL evidence to support an as yet UNPROVEN Theory I doubt science and am stuck on religion.

Unlike you I have an open mind and am constantly asking for evidence that you simply lie about misstate or misrepresent. I admit it is POSSIBLE that God created man via evolution You can not will not and refuse to admit there is a God at all. I ask for evidence. You just state dogma.

Don't bother; FFI has in Internet PhD.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You keep claiming just because a scientist said something it is true

You shameless, lying little weasel. I have not done that. Lies make baby jesus cry.

Why do you lie?
You always claim such.

Neato!

So, professor...why do you suppose the skulls from the Pleistocene appear to follow a fairly smooth continuum. And why do they all look so much more human than earlier ape skulls? And progressively more so, as you follow the timeline.

Coincidence? The gods trying to fool us?

 

[Indeependent]

You keep claiming just because a scientist said something it is true

You shameless, lying little weasel. I have not done that. Lies make baby jesus cry.

Why do you lie?
You always claim such.

Neato!

So, professor...why do you suppose the skulls from the Pleistocene appear to follow a fairly smooth continuum. And why do they all look so much more human than earlier ape skulls? And progressively more so, as you follow the timeline.

Coincidence? The gods trying to fool us?

You mean the skulls from the humans who were suffering from arthritis and other physical disorders?
Oh yeah, I heard of them...you didn't.

You never answered my question about the single celled organism becoming millions of male/female pairs.
Because you can't and no evolutionist will ever bother to try and answer it because they can't.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You keep claiming just because a scientist said something it is true

You shameless, lying little weasel. I have not done that. Lies make baby jesus cry.

Why do you lie?
You always claim such.

Neato!

So, professor...why do you suppose the skulls from the Pleistocene appear to follow a fairly smooth continuum. And why do they all look so much more human than earlier ape skulls? And progressively more so, as you follow the timeline.

Coincidence? The gods trying to fool us?

You claimed unbroken trail back millions of years here is the Smithsonian's interactive guide NOTICE all the breaks and in some cases more then one species that supposedly was an ancestor of man. Human Evolution Timeline Interactive

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You mean the skulls from the humans who were suffering from arthritis and other physical disorders?

All of them? Some of them? There are 100s. You can look at them. Somehow, of the rare fossils that we found, most or all were deformed? Surely you understand that this is absurd.

You never answered my question about the single celled organism becoming millions of male/female pairs.

I did, the very first time I heard you ask it. I provided you with the best explanation that we currently have.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You claimed unbroken trail back millions of years

Yep, pretty much. As unbroken as any other. It's very well-evidenced.. Nobody expects to have a fossil from every single one of the 100s of 1000s of generations between old and new species. Except nutters trying to rig the game.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You claimed unbroken trail back millions of years

Yep, pretty much. As unbroken as any other. It's very well-evidenced.. Nobody expects to have a fossil from every single one of the 100s of 1000s of generations between old and new species. Except nutters trying to rig the game.

LOL they don't even show a straight progression but broken in time and place. And the only defining characteristic they use to claim a monkey is a man is they sometimes walked up right. You are simply stupid there is no unbroken record and there isn't even a direct link from one to the next except they seem to have walked upright at times. Again the ONLY actual verifiable record is about 400 thousand years old. And that is of a Monkey.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

LOL they don't even show a straight progression but broken in time and place.

Uh, yes they do. As much as anyone could ask for. Look at them.

Again, the evidence that has convinced nearly every educated person on the planet isn't enough for you. At this point, that's your problem. Nobody else's. I am sure you can reject evolution and lead a long, happy life.

 

[abu afak]

Origin of Life Theory Called Into Question by Volcanic Rock Study

Animals may have emerged under very different conditions.

getpocket.com

They have been claiming for hundred years or more life needed oxygen to evolve into complex forms. Turns out they were mostly wrong, Very little oxygen was present when the first complex life forms evolved. If they got that wrong what else have they gotten wrong?

""" Though all present-day life on Earth requires oxygen to survive, the sea and sky were not oxygen-rich when life first emerged. Photo from nuisk17 / Getty Images. """

So you are accepting Genesis was, and still IS Wrong.
`

 

[ding]

Origin of Life Theory Called Into Question by Volcanic Rock Study

Animals may have emerged under very different conditions.

getpocket.com

They have been claiming for hundred years or more life needed oxygen to evolve into complex forms. Turns out they were mostly wrong, Very little oxygen was present when the first complex life forms evolved. If they got that wrong what else have they gotten wrong?

""" Though all present-day life on Earth requires oxygen to survive, the sea and sky were not oxygen-rich when life first emerged. Photo from nuisk17 / Getty Images. """

So you are accepting Genesis was, and still IS Wrong.
`

New Big Bang evidence supports Biblical creation, says Orthodox physicist

Counters nonreligious professor: The Genesis account of the formation of the heavens and the earth has nothing to do with science

www.timesofisrael.com

 

[Hollie]

“National Socialism derives from each of the two camps the pure idea that characterizes it, national resolution from bourgeois tradition; vital, creative socialism from the teaching of Marxism.”

Interview by Hanns Johst in Frankforter Volksblatt, Jan. 27, 1934, David Schoenbaum, Hitler’s Social Revolution: Class and Status in Nazi Germany, 1933–1939, New York: NY, W. W. Norton & Company, 1997, p. 57

But Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery. – Adolf Hitler

Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.

Adolf Hitler



I am personally convinced of the great power and deep significance of Christianity, and I won't allow any other religion to be promoted.

Adolf Hitler


As for the Jews, I am just carrying on with the same policy which the Catholic Church has adopted for fifteen hundred years, when it has regarded the Jews as dangerous and pushed them into ghettos etc., because it knew what the Jews were like. I don't put race above religion, but I do see the danger in the representatives of this race for Church and State, and perhaps I am doing Christianity a great service.

Adolf Hitler


I am convinced that I am acting as the agent of our Almighty Creator. By fighting the Jews, I am doing the Lord's work.

Adolf Hitler


Today Christians ... stand at the head of [this country]... I pledge that I never will tie myself to parties who want to destroy Christianity .. We want to fill our culture again with the Christian spirit ... We want to burn out all the recent immoral developments in literature, in the theater, and in the press - in short, we want to burn out the poison of immorality which has entered into our whole life and culture as a result of liberal excess during the past ... (few) years.

Adolf Hitler

 

[Hollie]

“National Socialism derives from each of the two camps the pure idea that characterizes it, national resolution from bourgeois tradition; vital, creative socialism from the teaching of Marxism.”

Interview by Hanns Johst in Frankforter Volksblatt, Jan. 27, 1934, David Schoenbaum, Hitler’s Social Revolution: Class and Status in Nazi Germany, 1933–1939, New York: NY, W. W. Norton & Company, 1997, p. 57

But Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery. – Adolf Hitler

 

[ReinyDays]

Hollie ... why do you know so many quotes from Adolf Hitler? ...

 

[ChemEngineer]

Unlike you I have an open mind and am constantly asking for evidence that you simply lie about misstate or misrepresent. I admit it is POSSIBLE that God created man via evolution You can not will not and refuse to admit there is a God at all. I ask for evidence. You just state dogma.

Gunny, YOU are The Man. Please don't waste your time on hateful ignorati. They're not worth it. Use Ignore option.

Now please see this: Let's Examine Claims of Atheists

If you have any suggestions or additions, please PM me. I'm eager to improve it any way I can.

I also maintain Proof There Is No God

so named to attract atheists where their lies and condescension are sliced and diced.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Origin of Life Theory Called Into Question by Volcanic Rock Study

Animals may have emerged under very different conditions.

getpocket.com

They have been claiming for hundred years or more life needed oxygen to evolve into complex forms. Turns out they were mostly wrong, Very little oxygen was present when the first complex life forms evolved. If they got that wrong what else have they gotten wrong?

""" Though all present-day life on Earth requires oxygen to survive, the sea and sky were not oxygen-rich when life first emerged. Photo from nuisk17 / Getty Images. """

So you are accepting Genesis was, and still IS Wrong.
`

New Big Bang evidence supports Biblical creation, says Orthodox physicist

Counters nonreligious professor: The Genesis account of the formation of the heavens and the earth has nothing to do with science

www.timesofisrael.com

ding my Friend, I just sent an email to professor Piran, expressing my dissent from his claim that the Bible is not a scientific document. Scientific truths permeate the Scriptures as can be seen at Proof There Is No God

Don't waste your time on hateful ignorati when there are far more productive things you could do with those minutes.

 

[Hollie]

Hollie ... why do you know so many quotes from Adolf Hitler? ...

It is a way to educate the ‘’Hitler was not a Christian”, Christians.