Sally Yates testifies tomorrow and the alt right is running for cover

[JakeStarkey]

She politicized the office of AG. She may also have leaked classified information about Flynn to the media. She may also have illegally accessed his identity from NSA files.

She did no such thing. She "may have" flown to the moon, toomuchtime. Today she testifies, and you are shaking in fear. Good.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No he didn't!

Yes, Trump was warned about Flynn, and Spicer confirmed it.

 

[Dale Smith]

But yet we have the Vault 7 release that shows that the CIA can mimic hacks from any country and then blame them for a cyber attack. Besides, I wouldn't give a shit if Russia did do it and then turned it over to Assange......throw in the RNC as well because they are just as compromised and corrupt as the Fabian socialist left. What I find absolutely jaw-dropping and totally hilarious is how incredulous the leftard clown posse is for being pissed and crying "FOUL!!!!" for having it's plot to steal the election was exposed....THAT is at the very core of this issue. All this deflecting to whom did it is just a smokescreen to deflect from the contents of said e-mails.

More conspiracy?
Memoirs from the fringe.

Why is it that I am not surprised that you know nothing about the Vault 7 release?

I know about it. It's not surprising that they would have those capabilities. It's still conspiracy nonsense to suggest that the CIA was actually behind the hacking.

But yet we have the Vault 7 release that shows that the CIA can mimic hacks from any country and then blame them for a cyber attack. Besides, I wouldn't give a shit if Russia did do it and then turned it over to Assange......throw in the RNC as well because they are just as compromised and corrupt as the Fabian socialist left. What I find absolutely jaw-dropping and totally hilarious is how incredulous the leftard clown posse is for being pissed and crying "FOUL!!!!" for having it's plot to steal the election was exposed....THAT is at the very core of this issue. All this deflecting to whom did it is just a smokescreen to deflect from the contents of said e-mails.

More conspiracy?
Memoirs from the fringe.

Why is it that I am not surprised that you know nothing about the Vault 7 release?

I know about it. It's not surprising that they would have those capabilities. It's still conspiracy nonsense to suggest that the CIA was actually behind the hacking.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dude, thanks for the laugh....I needed that!!!!!

No doubt you do. Today's a tough day for you. It's the beginning of Trump's dramatic downhill slide. Stand by. More to come.

Trump has learned all he needed to know about who really calls the shots shortly after he took office.... and it's not him. This country as well as the rest of the world is up to it's neck in shit. But keep re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic that is this country. You really have no clue but you have plenty of company.

 

[jc456]

why would both sessions and flynn LIE under oath??

when did flynn lie? when did session's lie? hmmmmm you are still in dream state.

flynn lied and lost his job. Sessions lied in his nomination hearing, he should also have lost his job.

when did flynn lie under oath? that was your statement. Session's never lied. so, you are 0 for two.

 

[Avatar4321]

I predict no one cares

 

[TheDude]

She knows the who, what, when, and where of the Flynns, et al, but the Trumpkins would not listen.

Now the world gets to listen.

Sally Yates to testify at May 8 Senate hearing "Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates is set to testify May 8 before a Senate judiciary investigation into Russia's interference in last year's elections, her second congressional hearing at which she's scheduled to testify within the span of a week. "

Mod Edit -- No links to other message forums. JakeStarkey
Sally Yates Testimony to Shine Public Light on Russia Probes "Monday testimony from Sally Yates, former acting attorney general, is expected to be a compelling public moment in the so-far largely secretive investigations "

I see you're assuming (hoping) she knows something giving reason to stroke the liberal nerve. Say OP, what you wanna bet the results will be your disappointment?

 

[jc456]

She knows the who, what, when, and where of the Flynns, et al, but the Trumpkins would not listen.

Now the world gets to listen.

Sally Yates to testify at May 8 Senate hearing "Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates is set to testify May 8 before a Senate judiciary investigation into Russia's interference in last year's elections, her second congressional hearing at which she's scheduled to testify within the span of a week. "

Mod Edit -- No links to other message forums. JakeStarkey
Sally Yates Testimony to Shine Public Light on Russia Probes "Monday testimony from Sally Yates, former acting attorney general, is expected to be a compelling public moment in the so-far largely secretive investigations "

I see you're assuming (hoping) she knows something giving reason to stroke the liberal nerve. Say OP, what you wanna bet the results will be your disappointment?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Breaking:


General Flynn was given the highest security clearance by the Obama Administration – but the Fake News seldom likes talking about that. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 8, 2017


Sally Yates and democrat trolls are nervous. Trump's just determined.

General Flynn was given the highest security clearance by the Obama Administration –

Obama warned Trump that Flynn was sketchy.

There is no proof Obama did anything of a sort.

Spicey just confirmed it, fool.

No he didn't!

No he didn't!

 

[Valerie]

In the most abstract sense, there is nothing noteworthy about a government official meeting with an ambassador from a foreign country. When such an interaction becomes important is when that official is an ally of a presidential campaign that’s got a complex set of possibly inappropriate relationships with other representatives of that ambassador’s country — and when that official while under oath says he did not have communications with representatives of that country.

What we’re going to endeavor to do here is to parse out that complex set of relationships, using the information we have at hand. In this case, as you’ve hopefully ascertained, the country at issue is Russia and the campaign is that of President Trump. The official, of course, is Attorney General Jeff Sessions. And the ambassador is, at this point, the linchpin of a lot of the interactions between Trump and the rest of his team.

Analysis | The web of relationships between Team Trump and Russia



In 2008, Don Jr., who works for the Trump Organization, famously told a real estate conference that “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets” and that “we see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.”



Feb 19th 2017 "a secret deal to lift sanctions on Russia was hand delivered to Michael Flynn."

Here’s A Cheat Sheet To The Moments That Mattered In Trump’s First 100 Days


Paul Manafort, former campaign manager. Manafort’s links to Russian interests are well established. New revelations that emerged during the campaign prompted Trump to demand Manafort’s resignation. Manafort is one of the Trump campaign staffers who reportedly made contact with Russian interests during the campaign.

Rex Tillerson, secretary of state. Before he was confirmed to serve as the head of the State Department, even Republicans questioned Tillerson’s relationship to Putin. As the head of ExxonMobil, Tillerson helped negotiate a massive agreement between the Russian government and ExxonMobil-Rosneft, a partnership between the two companies. Tillerson was subsequently awarded the “Order of Friendship” by Putin.

Wilbur Ross, secretary of commerce. Ross’s connections to Russian business interests are less obvious than Tillerson’s. During the Clinton administration, Ross served on the board of the U.S.-Russia Investment Fund, an effort to bolster businesses in post-Cold-War Russia. During his confirmation, questions arose about his ownership of a bank on Cyprus that, in the words of McClatchy’s Kevin Hall, “caters to wealthy Russians.”

Roger Stone, longtime adviser. Stone’s connection to Russia is murky. During the campaign, he drew attention for seeming to have inside knowledge on the WikiLeaks document releases — releases that have been linked to Russian interests by the government. More directly, the Times reports that Stone is possibly under investigation by the U.S. government for his links to Russia.

Carter Page, former adviser. Page is included in that alleged investigation as well, but his links to Russia are more clear. Page pretty clearly met with Kislyak last year during the Republican convention in Cleveland, as he admitted to MSNBC’s Chris Hayes on Thursday night. He also has repeatedly addressed Russian business groups in that country, including twice in 2016. Over a decade ago, he worked in Russia as an investment banker.

J.D. Gordon, former adviser. Page is far in the outer orbit of Trump’s circle, serving briefly as part of Trump’s national security advisory team. He’s joined there by Gordon, a onetime Pentagon spokesman who also served as an adviser to the campaign. Gordon, like Page, reportedly spoke with Kislyak in Cleveland.

This document should be considered a work in progress. As more information is released...

Analysis | The web of relationships between Team Trump and Russia




BBC, Jan. 12, 2017: On 15 October, the US secret intelligence court issued a warrant to investigate two Russian banks. This news was given to me by several sources and corroborated by someone I will identify only as a senior member of the US intelligence community. He would never volunteer anything – giving up classified information would be illegal – but he would confirm or deny what I had heard from other sources. …


Neither Mr Trump nor his associates are named in the FISA order, which would only cover foreign citizens or foreign entities – in this case the Russian banks. But ultimately, the investigation is looking for transfers of money from Russia to the United States, each one, if proved, a felony offence.


Examining Trump's Wiretap Claim - FactCheck.org

 

[Hutch Starskey]

More conspiracy?
Memoirs from the fringe.

Why is it that I am not surprised that you know nothing about the Vault 7 release?

I know about it. It's not surprising that they would have those capabilities. It's still conspiracy nonsense to suggest that the CIA was actually behind the hacking.

More conspiracy?
Memoirs from the fringe.

Why is it that I am not surprised that you know nothing about the Vault 7 release?

I know about it. It's not surprising that they would have those capabilities. It's still conspiracy nonsense to suggest that the CIA was actually behind the hacking.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dude, thanks for the laugh....I needed that!!!!!

No doubt you do. Today's a tough day for you. It's the beginning of Trump's dramatic downhill slide. Stand by. More to come.

Trump has learned all he needed to know about who really calls the shots shortly after he took office.... and it's not him. This country as well as the rest of the world is up to it's neck in shit. But keep re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic that is this country. You really have no clue but you have plenty of company.

Deep state boogeymen.

 

[jc456]

In the most abstract sense, there is nothing noteworthy about a government official meeting with an ambassador from a foreign country. When such an interaction becomes important is when that official is an ally of a presidential campaign that’s got a complex set of possibly inappropriate relationships with other representatives of that ambassador’s country — and when that official while under oath says he did not have communications with representatives of that country.

What we’re going to endeavor to do here is to parse out that complex set of relationships, using the information we have at hand. In this case, as you’ve hopefully ascertained, the country at issue is Russia and the campaign is that of President Trump. The official, of course, is Attorney General Jeff Sessions. And the ambassador is, at this point, the linchpin of a lot of the interactions between Trump and the rest of his team.

Analysis | The web of relationships between Team Trump and Russia



In 2008, Don Jr., who works for the Trump Organization, famously told a real estate conference that “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets” and that “we see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.”



Feb 19th 2017 "a secret deal to lift sanctions on Russia was hand delivered to Michael Flynn."

Here’s A Cheat Sheet To The Moments That Mattered In Trump’s First 100 Days


Paul Manafort, former campaign manager. Manafort’s links to Russian interests are well established. New revelations that emerged during the campaign prompted Trump to demand Manafort’s resignation. Manafort is one of the Trump campaign staffers who reportedly made contact with Russian interests during the campaign.

Rex Tillerson, secretary of state. Before he was confirmed to serve as the head of the State Department, even Republicans questioned Tillerson’s relationship to Putin. As the head of ExxonMobil, Tillerson helped negotiate a massive agreement between the Russian government and ExxonMobil-Rosneft, a partnership between the two companies. Tillerson was subsequently awarded the “Order of Friendship” by Putin.

Wilbur Ross, secretary of commerce. Ross’s connections to Russian business interests are less obvious than Tillerson’s. During the Clinton administration, Ross served on the board of the U.S.-Russia Investment Fund, an effort to bolster businesses in post-Cold-War Russia. During his confirmation, questions arose about his ownership of a bank on Cyprus that, in the words of McClatchy’s Kevin Hall, “caters to wealthy Russians.”

Roger Stone, longtime adviser. Stone’s connection to Russia is murky. During the campaign, he drew attention for seeming to have inside knowledge on the WikiLeaks document releases — releases that have been linked to Russian interests by the government. More directly, the Times reports that Stone is possibly under investigation by the U.S. government for his links to Russia.

Carter Page, former adviser. Page is included in that alleged investigation as well, but his links to Russia are more clear. Page pretty clearly met with Kislyak last year during the Republican convention in Cleveland, as he admitted to MSNBC’s Chris Hayes on Thursday night. He also has repeatedly addressed Russian business groups in that country, including twice in 2016. Over a decade ago, he worked in Russia as an investment banker.

J.D. Gordon, former adviser. Page is far in the outer orbit of Trump’s circle, serving briefly as part of Trump’s national security advisory team. He’s joined there by Gordon, a onetime Pentagon spokesman who also served as an adviser to the campaign. Gordon, like Page, reportedly spoke with Kislyak in Cleveland.

This document should be considered a work in progress. As more information is released...

Analysis | The web of relationships between Team Trump and Russia




BBC, Jan. 12, 2017: On 15 October, the US secret intelligence court issued a warrant to investigate two Russian banks. This news was given to me by several sources and corroborated by someone I will identify only as a senior member of the US intelligence community. He would never volunteer anything – giving up classified information would be illegal – but he would confirm or deny what I had heard from other sources. …


Neither Mr Trump nor his associates are named in the FISA order, which would only cover foreign citizens or foreign entities – in this case the Russian banks. But ultimately, the investigation is looking for transfers of money from Russia to the United States, each one, if proved, a felony offence.


Examining Trump's Wiretap Claim - FactCheck.org

 

[oreo]

She knows the who, what, when, and where of the Flynns, et al, but the Trumpkins would not listen.

Now the world gets to listen.

Sally Yates to testify at May 8 Senate hearing "Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates is set to testify May 8 before a Senate judiciary investigation into Russia's interference in last year's elections, her second congressional hearing at which she's scheduled to testify within the span of a week. "

Trump tried to block Sally Yates from testifying tomorrow. # ... "Trump tried to block Sally Yates from testifying tomorrow" Fuck Trump.

Sally Yates Testimony to Shine Public Light on Russia Probes "Monday testimony from Sally Yates, former acting attorney general, is expected to be a compelling public moment in the so-far largely secretive investigations "

This is a hilarious topic to me. Somehow leftards believe that Russian hackers got into the servers of the DNC and passed on information to Julian Assange showing what a corrupt entity that the DNC is and some of those e-mails were less than flattering about their brain dead constituents. It showed how they were planning to steal the election using various tactics such as hiring people to provoke altercations at Trump rallies and then play the "victim" and how their bought and paid for press would spin it that it was Trump supporters that were the assessors. E-mails showing how the "Shadow government" was going to protect her from the e-mail and private server flap. THEN, we have all the John Podesta e-mails with all the constant references to "pizza, pasta, walnut sauce, cheese, hot dogs, etc, etc that are codewords used by pedophiles. Hillary's ties to Laura Silsby that tried to snatch 33 kids out of Haiti because she said she was starting an orphanage and most of these kids had parents. She needed them for a "starter kit"? Why not start one there on the island since the Clinton foundation had taken in BILLIONS of dollars. Seems that the information contained in the Wikileak documents, Bill "drop trou" was sent there to smooth things over.

What we do know is that Seth Rich, a DNC operative that was pissed that Sanders was cheated out of being the nominee gave a thumb drive to a U.K ambassador that then took it to Julian Assange. Seth Rich was murdered a short time later. But allow me to play devil's advocate here and say that Russian intel did indeed hack the DNC....does it change the findings that were revealed? I would say unequivocally "no"....it doesn't change anything. I wish that the RNC would be hacked so people know just what a joke this fraudulent political system actually is and how your vote means nothing because the "Deep State" is the power behind USA.INC that is used as a hammer against countries that do not "play ball" with the globalist elites.

What pisses off uninformed and clueless posters like "Jake Smarmy" is that he feels that his Fabian socialist party is becoming inconsequential not knowing that both parties are just different sides of the same coin. The technocratic, one world feudalistic, communist agenda is staying the course and the plan for the "culling of the herd" is still in play. I sincerely doubt that Jake Smarmy is going to be happy with the outcome should they get their way. Those like Jake Smarmy are like petulant children that suffer from an inflated sense of self with "I am entitled" issues that have grown to worship this de-facto "gubermint" that has been a bankrupted entity since March of 1933.

I take it you believe that Bernie Sanders was "cheated out of the Nomination?" You apparently don't know that Hillary Clinton kicked his ass by 3,775,427 popular votes. In rhetrospect Obama beat Hillary Clinton by a mere 41,622 votes in 2008 and no cried foul.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Democratic Popular Vote
2008 Democratic Popular Vote | RealClearPolitics

That is the one main thing that Sanders and Trump had in common. They both campaigned on a rigged election.


All the other crap you state is nothing but

Nope, I know exactly of what I speak.....it's all in the e-mails. "Super Delegates" decided for Hitlery before the primaries? The DNC plotting against Sanders? Their use of the MSM? The MSM that even admitted that they were in her backpocket? Yeah, you just keep on thinking that. We did indeed dodge a bullet when the Hildebeast lost (not that Trump may be any better) but at least Trump isn't an outright communist and child trafficker and a traitor that opened up the patent offices to China during her first tour in the WH. She helped to arm ISIS and she was behind the illegal overthrow of Libya.........this is what you wanted to be the face of the franchise of USA.INC???

I don't give a rats ass about the super delegates--they are there for a reason and that reason is the election of 1984--something the Republican party might want to consider doing--because it eliminates the power of STUPID people.

In the primary-- losing by 3,775,437 popular votes is NOT a win. Being an asshole and staying in a race you've already lost while campaigning on a rigged election--doesn't mean you've been cheated out of an election.

When Bernie Sanders changed his party status to Democrat and jumped into this race he agreed to all DNC rules & regulations, including those SUPER DELEGATES. It's no wonder that the DNC got the hair up on their backs when he started campaigning on a rigged election.

So basically you don't trust the voters to decide their nominee? Not that it matters because our leaders are not elected, they are selected.

I trust smart people to make good decisions--and NO I don't trust STUPID people to make good decisions. Trump is a good case in point. There is no one that could have watched any of those debates either in the primary or with Hillary Clinton and walked away believing that Trump won a single one of them. If they tell you that, they're lying through their teeth.

Stupid people typically vote on emotion--and the brains are usually what they sit on. So what attracked you to Trump is this--and it's this that you voted for.

You ignored every single warning about Trump, including from Republicans. This is very funny but it is soooo true.
All Along I Thought Trump Wasn’t a Conservative/Republican, But Now I Realize I’m Not

A neuroscientist explains what may be wrong with Trump supporters’ brains

So YES after this disaster it would be a very good idea for the RNC to install Super Delegates into their primary process--like the DNC did in 1984 to insure that an Ass Clown never becomes the poster boy of the Republican party again.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

No he didn't!

Yes, Trump was warned about Flynn, and Spicer confirmed it.

Not true!

 

[jc456]

This is a hilarious topic to me. Somehow leftards believe that Russian hackers got into the servers of the DNC and passed on information to Julian Assange showing what a corrupt entity that the DNC is and some of those e-mails were less than flattering about their brain dead constituents. It showed how they were planning to steal the election using various tactics such as hiring people to provoke altercations at Trump rallies and then play the "victim" and how their bought and paid for press would spin it that it was Trump supporters that were the assessors. E-mails showing how the "Shadow government" was going to protect her from the e-mail and private server flap. THEN, we have all the John Podesta e-mails with all the constant references to "pizza, pasta, walnut sauce, cheese, hot dogs, etc, etc that are codewords used by pedophiles. Hillary's ties to Laura Silsby that tried to snatch 33 kids out of Haiti because she said she was starting an orphanage and most of these kids had parents. She needed them for a "starter kit"? Why not start one there on the island since the Clinton foundation had taken in BILLIONS of dollars. Seems that the information contained in the Wikileak documents, Bill "drop trou" was sent there to smooth things over.

What we do know is that Seth Rich, a DNC operative that was pissed that Sanders was cheated out of being the nominee gave a thumb drive to a U.K ambassador that then took it to Julian Assange. Seth Rich was murdered a short time later. But allow me to play devil's advocate here and say that Russian intel did indeed hack the DNC....does it change the findings that were revealed? I would say unequivocally "no"....it doesn't change anything. I wish that the RNC would be hacked so people know just what a joke this fraudulent political system actually is and how your vote means nothing because the "Deep State" is the power behind USA.INC that is used as a hammer against countries that do not "play ball" with the globalist elites.

What pisses off uninformed and clueless posters like "Jake Smarmy" is that he feels that his Fabian socialist party is becoming inconsequential not knowing that both parties are just different sides of the same coin. The technocratic, one world feudalistic, communist agenda is staying the course and the plan for the "culling of the herd" is still in play. I sincerely doubt that Jake Smarmy is going to be happy with the outcome should they get their way. Those like Jake Smarmy are like petulant children that suffer from an inflated sense of self with "I am entitled" issues that have grown to worship this de-facto "gubermint" that has been a bankrupted entity since March of 1933.

I take it you believe that Bernie Sanders was "cheated out of the Nomination?" You apparently don't know that Hillary Clinton kicked his ass by 3,775,427 popular votes. In rhetrospect Obama beat Hillary Clinton by a mere 41,622 votes in 2008 and no cried foul.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Democratic Popular Vote
2008 Democratic Popular Vote | RealClearPolitics

That is the one main thing that Sanders and Trump had in common. They both campaigned on a rigged election.


All the other crap you state is nothing but

Nope, I know exactly of what I speak.....it's all in the e-mails. "Super Delegates" decided for Hitlery before the primaries? The DNC plotting against Sanders? Their use of the MSM? The MSM that even admitted that they were in her backpocket? Yeah, you just keep on thinking that. We did indeed dodge a bullet when the Hildebeast lost (not that Trump may be any better) but at least Trump isn't an outright communist and child trafficker and a traitor that opened up the patent offices to China during her first tour in the WH. She helped to arm ISIS and she was behind the illegal overthrow of Libya.........this is what you wanted to be the face of the franchise of USA.INC???

I don't give a rats ass about the super delegates--they are there for a reason and that reason is the election of 1984--something the Republican party might want to consider doing--because it eliminates the power of STUPID people.

In the primary-- losing by 3,775,437 popular votes is NOT a win. Being an asshole and staying in a race you've already lost while campaigning on a rigged election--doesn't mean you've been cheated out of an election.

When Bernie Sanders changed his party status to Democrat and jumped into this race he agreed to all DNC rules & regulations, including those SUPER DELEGATES. It's no wonder that the DNC got the hair up on their backs when he started campaigning on a rigged election.

So basically you don't trust the voters to decide their nominee? Not that it matters because our leaders are not elected, they are selected.

I trust smart people to make good decisions--and NO I don't trust STUPID people to make good decisions. Trump is a good case in point. There is no one that could have watched any of those debates either in the primary or with Hillary Clinton and walked away believing that Trump won a single one of them. In fact he got CREAMED. If they tell you that, they're lying through their teeth.

Stupid people typically vote on emotion--and the brains are usually what they sit on. So what attracked you to Trump is this--and it's this that you voted for.

You ignored every single warning about Trump, including from Republicans. This is very funny but it is soooo true.
All Along I Thought Trump Wasn’t a Conservative/Republican, But Now I Realize I’m Not

the thing that kept me going was his WINNING! And he kept WINNING. I voted for him and he WON!!!!!! wow, translation to your post, butthurt libturd whining.

 

[JakeStarkey]

She knows the who, what, when, and where of the Flynns, et al, but the Trumpkins would not listen.

Now the world gets to listen.

Sally Yates to testify at May 8 Senate hearing "Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates is set to testify May 8 before a Senate judiciary investigation into Russia's interference in last year's elections, her second congressional hearing at which she's scheduled to testify within the span of a week. "

Mod Edit -- No links to other message forums. JakeStarkey
Sally Yates Testimony to Shine Public Light on Russia Probes "Monday testimony from Sally Yates, former acting attorney general, is expected to be a compelling public moment in the so-far largely secretive investigations "

I see you're assuming (hoping) she knows something giving reason to stroke the liberal nerve. Say OP, what you wanna bet the results will be your disappointment?

You know no such thing in your goofy head. What she says will have interest for everyone.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No he didn't!

Yes, Trump was warned about Flynn, and Spicer confirmed it.

Not true!

Why are you lying?

 

[toomuchtime_]

So what you are saying is anyone critical of Yates' behavior must be a misogynist.

There's plenty of posts attacking her appearance and questioning her competency.
It's there.

So you're saying anyone critical of her is a misogynist?

Only when they're attacking with obvious gender bias.

What did she do that warrants criticism at all?

She politicized the office of AG. She may also have leaked classified information about Flynn to the media. She may also have illegally accessed his identity from NSA files.

She did no such thing. She was acting AG. She was privy to information pertaining to the ongoing investigations including anything known about Flynn.

The only criticism you could have is her refusal to back Trump's order. The same order that was struck down. She was correct.

In other words you don't care if she committed crimes concerning the unmasking of Flynn or the leak of classified information to the media in order to make her anti Trump gesture.

 

[toomuchtime_]

She politicized the office of AG. She may also have leaked classified information about Flynn to the media. She may also have illegally accessed his identity from NSA files.

She did no such thing. She "may have" flown to the moon, toomuchtime. Today she testifies, and you are shaking in fear. Good.

In fear of what, Jake? If you're not a complete moron by now you know there never was any basis for an investigation of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, so what can she say?

 

[JakeStarkey]

tmt is truly rekt feg at this. Show us any crimes she committed. You can't.

 

[toomuchtime_]

tmt is truly rekt feg at this. Show us any crimes she committed. You can't./

Rekt feg? Is that from the language spoken on your planet, Jake?

 

[TheDude]

She knows the who, what, when, and where of the Flynns, et al, but the Trumpkins would not listen.

Now the world gets to listen.

Sally Yates to testify at May 8 Senate hearing "Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates is set to testify May 8 before a Senate judiciary investigation into Russia's interference in last year's elections, her second congressional hearing at which she's scheduled to testify within the span of a week. "

Mod Edit -- No links to other message forums. JakeStarkey
Sally Yates Testimony to Shine Public Light on Russia Probes "Monday testimony from Sally Yates, former acting attorney general, is expected to be a compelling public moment in the so-far largely secretive investigations "

I see you're assuming (hoping) she knows something giving reason to stroke the liberal nerve. Say OP, what you wanna bet the results will be your disappointment?

You know no such thing in your goofy head. What she says will have interest for everyone.

WTF are you talking about? Perhaps you should read the OP.