Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Would you expect that the Conservative government would be less agreeable to supporting America's war against Russia?We need regime change in Canada, instead. For peace and freedom in Europe.
I don´t know the Canadian parties. I guess any mainstream party in Canada would exercise preemptive obedience, like they do in Europe.Would you expect that the Conservative government would be less agreeable to supporting America's war against Russia?
Fwiw, that's not even imaginable at this point in time and it doesn't seem that any antiwar movement has been born yet in Canada.
A concerted effort by Europeans to end support for America's war would possibly tip the scales in Canada toward peace being supported by the Liberals. Frankly, very unlikely by the Conservatives.
Don't forget that Chretien, a Liberal P.M., refused Canada's support in the Iraq phony war.
FYI, Conservative, Liberal, and New Democratic Party, with the last being more to the left. They're all signed onto America's war against Russia.I don´t know the Canadian parties. I guess any mainstream party in Canada would exercise preemptive obedience, like they do in Europe.
Yesterday German chancellor Scholz said the US is not planing regime change in Russia.
Sounds more like Canada's war, duck.Conservative, Liberal, and New Democratic Party, with the last being more to the left.
They know there is something shady about it but you can´t debate with them in RL. On the Internet, the positions are mixed with most people favoring Russia on the politics forum where I am and others favoring Ukraine but they have zero arguments. You can show them a video showing Ukraine targeting ambulances and they would only come up with alleged Russian war crimes. It doesn´t seem that those are defending their own views but that of someone else.FYI, Conservative, Liberal, and New Democratic Party, with the last being more to the left. They're all signed onto America's war against Russia.
America's main talking point is convincing everybody that it's not an effort at regime change for Russia, it's on behalf of the Ukraine.
Canada buys the talking point so far, even though the idea is obviously nonsense. 40 US led wars of aggression by America since WW2 tells a pretty vivid story!
Do Europeans still buy America's excuse for their war? Majority?
For once I agree.We need regime change in Canada,
Probably doesn't matter much what the propagandists' have convinced the people of Nato countries to believe. The Ukraine is practically destroyed now and half the population have moved away to other countries. The word is that they won't be going back.They know there is something shady about it but you can´t debate with them in RL. On the Internet, the positions are mixed with most people favoring Russia on the politics forum where I am and others favoring Ukraine but they have zero arguments. You can show them a video showing Ukraine targeting ambulances and they would only come up with alleged Russian war crimes. It doesn´t seem that those are defending their own views but that of someone else.
America is good at bombing deserts. A war like in Ukraine would be lost for America/Europe.Probably doesn't matter much what the propagandists' have convinced the people of Nato countries to believe. The Ukraine is practically destroyed now and half the population have moved away to other countries. The word is that they won't be going back.
And Russia is showing that it's still a superpower that won't be defeated. People like Scott Ritter and Col. Douglas Macgregor are even suggesting that Russia could fight to a draw at least with America, with conventional weapons and artillery practices that Russia has developed.
America has gambled on defeating Russia and at the right time too. The odds against America just get worse now as Russia settles on a war footing.
Of course Russia will never be defeated, but that's essential for America's goal of uncontested world domination.
What did you do in the war, duck? What are your credentials that make you the expert? RT, CCP?Probably doesn't matter much what the propagandists' have convinced the people of Nato countries to believe. The Ukraine is practically destroyed now and half the population have moved away to other countries. The word is that they won't be going back.
And Russia is showing that it's still a superpower that won't be defeated. People like Scott Ritter and Col. Douglas Macgregor are even suggesting that Russia could fight to a draw at least with America, with conventional weapons and artillery practices that Russia has developed.
America has gambled on defeating Russia and at the right time too. The odds against America just get worse now as Russia settles on a war footing.
Of course Russia will never be defeated, but that's essential for America's goal of uncontested world domination.
The theory is that Europe couldn't fight a war against Russia because it relies on the US for protection. That doesn't appear to be contested with any commitment.America is good at bombing deserts. A war like in Ukraine would be lost for America/Europe.
Also, a direct Involvement would spark protests in the US. No, this won´t happen, this is why they sacrifice Ukraine.The theory is that Europe couldn't fight a war against Russia because it relies on the US for protection. That doesn't appear to be contested with any commitment.
So America needs to transport it's warmaking capability to a Russian front and that could be impossible. Any transporting of arms and men to Europe could apparently be destroyed by Russia before it reached European shores. And that doesn't include China becoming involved due to threat of China having to be next to be dealt with.
It makes for interesting speculation over the possibilities of 'conventional war without all parties going nuclear.
Supersonic missile capability has put a new face on conventional war for all participants
Having said that, it makes no sense to try to fight an armchair war on this forum, but still the facts as we see them shouldn't be avoided.
Name 1 time regime change has worked and was good.Russia reacts to Canadian call for ‘regime change’
Moscow protests over remarks by Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Joly, who called for regime change in Russiawww.rt.com
As an issue of interest to all Canadians. Is this overreach by the Trudeau government? How will the Conservative party react to this objection by Russia?
There are several good reasons why America's direct involvement against Russia is prohibitive.Also, a direct Involvement would spark protests in the US. No, this won´t happen, this is why they sacrifice Ukraine.
Go play Dooks.Name 1 time regime change has worked and was good.
Could be the usual and random coup attempts like in Belarus.There are several good reasons why America's direct involvement against Russia is prohibitive.
From an American POV, everything is indicating failure with the Ukraine front and so a new front needs to be opened up. Georgia now appears to be the only possibility.
Any attempt by a Nato country would have to be interpreted by Russia as an attack by all.
Nato's article 5 is a two-way street! America and Russia will then become officially at war with each other.
Russia has taken precautions against US meddling with the purpose of opening up another front.Could be the usual and random coup attempts like in Belarus.
I bet the whole Ukraine thing was just another usual and random coup.Russia has taken precautions against US meddling with the purpose of opening up another front.
But make no mistake, America is not going to lose this one easily. There's far too much at stake now.
Maybe Litwin has it figured out? LOL
