Think about it. A seventeen-year old lifeguard gets attacked while trying to stop thugs is called a murderer while a thug/junky thirty years his senior is "sainted".
There is something seriously wrong with America.
Rittenhouse didn't die. Apples and oranges. He'll get his day in court. Haven't noticed him being demonized lately. Haven't actually seen him mentioned much, even here on the USMB lately.
So what? WTF does that have to do with anything, except perhaps that saints have to be dead?
The thread title was
Rittenhouse Vilified/Floyd Canonized - Something's Wrong. They are two totally different cases, having nothing to do with each other in any way.
Think about it. A seventeen-year old lifeguard gets attacked while trying to stop thugs is called a murderer while a thug/junky thirty years his senior is "sainted".
There is something seriously wrong with America.
Rittenhouse didn't die. Apples and oranges. He'll get his day in court. Haven't noticed him being demonized lately. Haven't actually seen him mentioned much, even here on the USMB lately.
So what? WTF does that have to do with anything, except perhaps that saints have to be dead?
The thread title was Rittenhouse Vilified/Floyd Canonized - Something's Wrong. They are two totally different cases, having nothing to do with each other in any way.
Most people don't think Floyd was a saint, just know he shouldn't have been murdered by police.
Most don't think of Rittenhouse as a true villain, just a dumb ass kid that bought a weapon out of state, because not legal for him to buy and go armed with it in his state, not even allowed without supervision in the state he decided to go, to attend a riot. Sounds like lousy parenting to me. Every adult the that was responsible and or assisted him having an AR-15 over there in that adjacent state, including his parents, deserve to be prosecuted and have the crap sued out of them. They all let that dumb ass kid down, and let him get involve in a situation way, way over his juvenile head. I wouldn't prosecute the kid as an adult, but he had to be charged and this has to be adjudicated. That state has laws and they certainly do not need kids coming across state lines, illegally possessing weapons to help their police handle riot situations. It's just now a good idea.
We are not idiots. You know exactly what the title meant. Your moronic excuses are not sufficient to alter the obvious truth. BTW, stop with the snowflake absurdities.
You sound like idiots. How was anybody to know.
You think juveniles with weapons attending riots out of state is a good ideal?
You think his parents exercised proper control?
You think the straw buyer who help purchase the weapon is mister responsible good guy?
You think the property owner that let him be there protecting his interests is a good guy?
You think the adults with him that let him get separated were good guys?
Does anybody here think that riots are not super fluid violent environments or are suitable places for kid?
Get real, Doofus. You can't even join the Army without parents permission at that kid's age, as contracts are void or voidable at discretion of either party until age of majority, even under uniform commercial code, as juveniles are not considered responsible.
www.hideoutnow.com
nworeport.me
