Right wingers...regarding Orlando tragedy....you have a tough choice to make

[Soggy in NOLA]

I would note one small difference, the Jews in Germany weren't going around killing as many people as they could, were they?

True....the Nazis were much "better" at eliminating those whom they consider a threat....Now, do you want for us to emulate the Nazi's methodologies?

Nobody's advocating any such thing... other than the Islamists.

 

[Rustic]

By using the words "assault weapon" your creditability with those who know firearms drops to less than zero.

Killed 50 people with it....THAT is some assault weapon

That weapon didn't kill 50 people by itself, now did it?

Imagine if he had only a revolver, can you imagine the number of people the shooter wouldn't have killed?

What does that have to do with anything? A revolver can have as many as six rounds in it. If the shooter was an expert marksman, he could have killed six people with it. It doesn't matter what weapon he had, killing six people is just as bad as killing 50. Any loss of life is unacceptable.

A person with an AR-15 has the ability to kill 50 people, injure 53 more. A revolver, not so much.

Deflection noted

 

[TemplarKormac]

By using the words "assault weapon" your creditability with those who know firearms drops to less than zero.

Killed 50 people with it....THAT is some assault weapon

That weapon didn't kill 50 people by itself, now did it?

Imagine if he had only a revolver, can you imagine the number of people the shooter wouldn't have killed?

What does that have to do with anything? A revolver can have as many as six rounds in it. If the shooter was an expert marksman, he could have killed six people with it. It doesn't matter what weapon he had, killing six people is just as bad as killing 50. Any loss of life is unacceptable.

A person with an AR-15 has the ability to kill 50 people, injure 53 more. A revolver, not so much.

A quite noteworthy deflection.

It doesn't matter what weapon he used, a revolver (apple) and an AR-15 (orange) are both capable of killing. Murder is murder, whether one victim or fifty. Why can't you blame terrorism for this? Is it beyond your level of comprehension to acknowledge that a human being who possessed the desire to kill used the gun as an implement to commit an act of terrorism?

 

[HappyJoy]

...Imagine if he had only a revolver, can you imagine the number of people the shooter wouldn't have killed?

Folks... ever notice how these LibTards feed off of such tragedies to further their agenda... no regard for the gays... no regard for Muslims... it's all about their agenda.

Ya just can't trust Liberals... they even (metaphorically) eat their own, and even exploit tragedies amongst and caused by groups that they love to defend...

Scum...

I'm talking about the effectiveness of some guns over others. There is nothing disrespectful about my post. Actually, what you're doing, is kind of disgusting.

 

[Iceweasel]

Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.

Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR

You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......

If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,

No one supports selling any guns to maniacs. Your argument is flawed from the beginning. That's what happens when your world view filters through your beady little eyes into your rodent brain.

I'm a gun owner numerous times over, including an AR, not religious at all and so far haven't mowed down a crowd of people. The guy was on a watch list so if there's a failure it's succumbing to political correctness over our safety.

 

[nat4900]

Orlando Shooting Suspect Identified As Omar Mateen, Registered Democrat Of Afghan Descent; Pledged Allegiance To ISIS | Zero Hedge

Registered democrat?????

 

[HappyJoy]

Killed 50 people with it....THAT is some assault weapon

That weapon didn't kill 50 people by itself, now did it?

Imagine if he had only a revolver, can you imagine the number of people the shooter wouldn't have killed?

What does that have to do with anything? A revolver can have as many as six rounds in it. If the shooter was an expert marksman, he could have killed six people with it. It doesn't matter what weapon he had, killing six people is just as bad as killing 50. Any loss of life is unacceptable.

A person with an AR-15 has the ability to kill 50 people, injure 53 more. A revolver, not so much.

Deflection noted

Sorry, clarifying my point is in no way a deflection.

Where did you people go to school?

 

[Kondor3]

...Imagine if he had only a revolver, can you imagine the number of people the shooter wouldn't have killed?

Folks... ever notice how these LibTards feed off of such tragedies to further their agenda... no regard for the gays... no regard for Muslims... it's all about their agenda.

Ya just can't trust Liberals... they even (metaphorically) eat their own, and even exploit tragedies amongst and caused by groups that they love to defend...

Scum...

I'm talking about the effectiveness of some guns over others. There is nothing disrespectful about my post. Actually, what you're doing, is kind of disgusting.

Thank you for your feedback.

===========================================

Your Honor, the Prosecution rests.

 

[Iceweasel]

Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.

Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR

You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......

If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,

By using the words "assault weapon" your creditability with those who know firearms drops to less than zero.

Killed 50 people with it....THAT is some assault weapon

That weapon didn't kill 50 people by itself, now did it?

Imagine if he had only a revolver, can you imagine the number of people the shooter wouldn't have killed?

Imagine if Europe only had tough gun laws how safe they would be.

 

[Militants]

Saudis have more terrorists than Iraq when America doing war in Iraqis land. Hussein loses his throne after USA frigates bombs towads then 1 year war between Iraq and USA ground forces. USA won that war. But then terrorists takes over and America leave Iraq in 2010 after they democreate hole Iraq after Husseins hangover. All Iraq regim destroys by USA.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I would note one small difference, the Jews in Germany weren't going around killing as many people as they could, were they?

True....the Nazis were much "better" at eliminating those whom they consider a threat....Now, do you want for us to emulate the Nazi's methodologies?

This has to be one of the more atrocious posts I've ever seen on this board. Someone praising the Nazis for their efficiency for killing Jews, how sickening.

 

[80zephyr]

No, this is you trying to mischaracterize what I said. I said nothing about being allowed to purchase a nuclear weapon. It is you blaming the weapon, not the man wielding it for the massacre in Orlando. It is man who is susceptible to the desire to kill. Guns are inanimate, non-sentient objects. They posses neither will nor intent. They cannot act on their own without a human being to guide it.

So, let me ask you a simple question......Had this shooter been able to ONLY purchase a hand gun, would he have amassed 50 dead and another 50 plus injuries???

OR, does the easy purchase of a MUCh more lethal weapon helped in his carnage?

And? If he could have killed twenty with the hand gun, it would be the next weapon you would want banned because it caused to many deaths.

"You" won't be happy until only single shot firearms are allowed, and I'm not even sure you wouldn't want to ban them.

Mark

 

[kaz]

Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.

Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR

You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......

If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,

Yes, of course, if we had made it illegal to buy a gun, then they wouldn't have bought them. You know, there is a short cut, we should have made murder illegal! Oh wait, we did. Hmm ... so what's your point on guns again?

 

[bripat9643]

Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.

Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR

You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......

If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,

Nice attempt to deflect from Obama's failure to do anything about Islamic terrorism. However, no one is buying it.

 

[nat4900]

Why can't you blame terrorism for this? Is it beyond your level of comprehension to acknowledge that a human being who possessed the desire to kill used the gun as an implement to commit an act of terrorism?

Moron....NO ONE is absolving terrorists for thier evil deeds....NO ONE.....

What this thread is about is the freaking EASE that your ilk allows for terrorists to kill MORE and more people....all so that your ilk can flaunt the 2nd amendment.

 

[kaz]

You left out a third option...

3. Start committing LibTards to sanitariums, who continue to tell us that Islam is a Religion of Peace.

Another right wing moron chimes in with a 3rd grade retort.....

Islam is just as much a "religion of peace" as Judaism is a religion of peace in Palestine....or Christianity is a religion of peace except in Ireland (or during the Crusades.)

Yes, every time there's a mass shooting or an explosion in a crowd of people, it's pretty much 50/50/50 whether it's a Christian, Jew or Muslim ...

 

[bripat9643]

The O. P. has a choice to make....whether she will get her head out of her ass long enough to realize that something must be done about Murderous Muslim Terrorism, or leave it in, and continue to look like a damn fool.

First of all, you eternal moron.......my head and ass is that of an older white MALE........An whether you realize it or not (probably not) Muslims are here to stay and YOU and your ilk are helping to arm them with the kind of weapons to do maximum harm..........So if you need to show off your "manhood" by allowing the ease of buying lethal guns, you are also contributing to the "cause" of murderous Muslims.

Your messiah has imported over a million of them and he wants to import more.

 

[OKTexas]

I would note one small difference, the Jews in Germany weren't going around killing as many people as they could, were they?

True....the Nazis were much "better" at eliminating those whom they consider a threat....Now, do you want for us to emulate the Nazi's methodologies?

Like the typical regressive sodomite enabler, your false analogy was proven to be bullshit and you double down on it. GOOD JOB!!!!!! LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[nat4900]

Nice attempt to deflect from Obama's failure to do anything about Islamic terrorism. However, no one is buying it.

Idiot....want to check out when this terrorist family came to the US and WHO was president then????

 

[kaz]

Why can't you blame terrorism for this? Is it beyond your level of comprehension to acknowledge that a human being who possessed the desire to kill used the gun as an implement to commit an act of terrorism?

Moron....NO ONE is absolving terrorists for thier evil deeds....NO ONE.....

What this thread is about is the freaking EASE that your ilk allows for terrorists to kill MORE and more people....all so that your ilk can flaunt the 2nd amendment.

Whether you are absolving them is between you and your God, whether you are aiding them is not a question, you are