Curious...we're worried about innocent women being victims of sexual assault and the like, but on the other hand we're defending an industry that portrays women as deeply voracious sexual objects.Florida Republicans Believe Porn Is More Dangerous Than Guns
The state's House of Representatives approved the resolution by a voice vote on Tuesday. The resolution states a need for education, research and policy changes to protect Floridians, especially teenagers, from pornography.
Republican Rep. Ross Spano says there is research that finds a connection between pornography use and mental and physical illnesses, forming and maintaining intimate relationships and deviant sexual behavior. Spano is also a candidate for attorney general.
The most twisted part of this is the demands by Florida Republicans to research the public health impact of porn, while the CDC is implicitly banned from doing research on gun violence. The 1996 Dickey Amendment specifically blocks the CDC from using its budget to "advocate or promote gun control," and since objective, peer-reviewed, scientific studies consistently show effective gun control would reduce gun violence, there's no research the CDC can do that won't sacrifice its funding.
-------------------------------------------------------
Yea, that's right. Republicans want to study the damage caused by porn but not the damage caused by guns.
And yet, they follow a guy who not only dates porn stars, they want him to be a role model for their children.
What is with these people?
Just imagine how much damage the porn industry is doing to the female image. It's partly the reason why a so called "rape culture", as leftists call it, exists.
I'm also curious about something else. If a woman wants to get a gun to protect herself from rapists, should we blame that decision on the over sexualized portrayal of women in Hollywood and in the porn industry, or on the rapists? Or both?