Republican sentorial slush fund for 2014 skirts law

whoa, how can this be? I guess dots could only dig up stuff on Republicans
If you people worried as much about Democrats we might not be in this mess we are in


SNIP:
Shadowy funders build liberal war chest to unseat governor

By Tori Richards / January 2, 2014 / No Comments



Print This Article




By Tori Richards | Watchdog.org

.

.

LISA GRAVES: The face – and mouth of the uber-liberal Center for Media and Democracy.

A few wealthy, anonymous donors funded a liberal activist group working on the failed recall of Wisconsin’s governor, Watchdog.org has learned.

Nearly 75 percent of the money funneled into the Center for Media and Democracy during 2011 and 2012 came from just a few donors whose names have been redacted from tax forms obtained by Watchdog.

CMD has said, “Most of CMD’s supporters are individual donors who give $5 or more a year to help support the Center’s general operations.”

Those “operations” included contributing to the unsuccessful but expensive effort by liberals and labor unions to unseat GOP Gov. Scott Walker in 2011 following his successful reform of Wisconsin’s public-employee benefits system.

CMD remains in the thick of things, recently using its own blog to cheerlead the Democratic district attorney of Milwaukee for launching a secret investigation of Walker’s conservative supporters.



There’s irony in the recently revealed CMD tax filings. A nonprofit that pushes its anti-conservative agenda on several blogs and through multiple allied liberal groups, CMD has blasted conservative and libertarian nonprofits for taking money from only a few anonymous donors. Whether on the left, right or anywhere else, it’s all legal: Tax law allows nonprofits to maintain donor anonymity.

Yet when asked in an interview about why she does the same thing, CMD Director Lisa Graves said there’s difference.

“The question of conservative funders versus liberal funders, I think, is a matter of false equivalency,” she said.

Graves refused to respond to phone calls seeking comment for this story.

all of it here
Shadowy funders build liberal war chest to unseat governor « Watchdog.org
 
a lot of rw ninnyhammering going on here. :eusa_hand: Ask becki what that means ;)

As to my OP, just pointing out the fact that one of the most cringe-worthy senate repubs up for reelection has a slush fund w/ smarmy connections :)

The truth hurts :( :boohoo:
 
Last edited:
It's legal, moron, so get over it. Both sides take advantage of the rules so if you don't like it get involved trying to change them rather than looking like an idiot, again, complaining about the side you don't like. Very low information of you.
 
The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

In appealing to the Supreme Court, the RNC’s lawyers cited past decisions by the justices that ended long-standing court orders involving school desegregation and prison overcrowding. But the justices with no dissent dismissed the appeal in the case of RNC vs. DNC.



cheating people out of their votes isn't legal



http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114
 

Forum List

Back
Top