Diuretic
Permanently confused
hello....
can someone point out the evidence against palin....you know evidence, not opinion
It's in the report.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hello....
can someone point out the evidence against palin....you know evidence, not opinion
ROFL... She didn't abuse power. What you're referring to is a subjective conclusion drawn by political opposition at a critical period in a hotly contested election, in which Governor Palin is running.
If you'd care to discuss the facts in the case and post your reasoning why you believe it was an abuse of power, then we can do that... but don't try to advertise a lie as something other than that... to do that would make YOU a liar.
Now BRING IT THE HELL ON Sis...
wrong genius...the report is authored by obammmy's boy....
if you read the report genius...she violated NO LAW....
next
provide me with one fact
just one
Huh.... I don't think I'm on the record as having denied any of that drivel...
So how I might be wrong with regard to any of it is known only to you.
I simply stated that the 'report' is a subjective conclusion by politicla partisans... and you informing us that a majority are 'republicans' is IRRELEVANT... Gov. Palin has routed the GOP in Alaska and she is hated by the GOP insiders as much IF NOT WORSE than she is the DEMOCRATS.
Beyond that, the conclusion rests upon specious reasoning... now either you have SPECIFIC EVIDENCE WHEREIN GOVERNOR PALIN CAN BE SHOWN ABUSING HER POWER OR YOU DO NOT... and Chris... it's looking more and more, with each passing post that you have ZIP in terms of evidence.
Now if meaningless platitudes and parroting talking points were specific evidence... MAN! You'd really be set... sadly (for you) such is just the means by which leftist distract and evade, thus are worthless to anyone but the fleeing leftists... (that's you).
good questionThen why is finding 1 that she broke the law?
good question
might want to ask branchflower why he contradicted himself
in the report he said Palin broke no lawsWhere did he do that?
As an aside - if all our efforts - beyond "typing" DC![]()
- in analysing this report, just the members here at USMB, were put together I reckon we could just about - if it were a collective and objective process - get it published in the Harvard Law Review.
Yes I'm exaggerating but my point is that there has been so much analysis of the report that I'm thinking right now it must be the most scrutinised document in the world![]()
in the report he said Palin broke no laws
go figure
in the report he said Palin broke no laws
go figure
i've read itPage 8 (heck I'm even memorising page numbers).
granted, that is possibleOne can abuse their power and not break any laws.
It's called no law being there for such a thing in the first place or loopholes.
i've read it
but he also stated in another place she broke no laws
i've read it
but he also stated in another place she broke no laws
He said she broke now laws relative to the State Trooper and Monegan I think it was. Finding number 3.
He said she broke now laws relative to the State Trooper and Monegan I think it was. Finding number 3.
and you wonder why people think you are a nutWrong.
She broke now laws with respect to the firing of Monegan. She violated the ethics law by trying to get Trooper Wooten fired.
Keep lying. It makes Republicans look desperate.
and you wonder why people think you are a nut
this is why
Wrong.
She broke now laws with respect to the firing of Monegan. She violated the ethics law by trying to get Trooper Wooten fired.
Keep lying. It makes Republicans look desperate.