Don't play stupid, you know of whom I speak.
The thug that was witnessed sitting on the chest of a man beating him while he screamed for help, who would not stop even when told that the police were being called.
No, you're not making sensr. Between the two, the only one with a criminal record was Zimmerman. But he's not black. So who are you talking about?
It only doesn't make sense if you don't understand that sitting on a man and beating him while he screams for help is a crime.
Is that the problem you are having with understanding me? DO you not know that beating people is illegal?
Or are you giving him a pass because his skin was black?
That's not necessarily a crime -- depending on the circumstances, it could be self defense. And again, the only one with a criminal record was Zimmerman. The only conclusion I can logically reach when you said there was a "young black criminal" is that you were hallucinating.
THat is a lie.
You could logically reach the conclusion that I find the idea that Martin was defending himself while sitting on top of Zimmerman and beating him while he screamed for help very unlikely.
It is
possible.
One could imagine a scenario where Zimmerman started the fight and was beating the crap out of Martin, until Martin managed to turn the tables.
Except that there is no evidence of that. Martin had no injuries that suggest that Zimmerman ever had the upper hand in the physical fight.
And there were no witnesses reporting that.
So why do you think that is the most likely scenario?
Because you don't. From the beginning you libs have been on the side of the black guy and looking for scenarios to rationalize your conclusion.
Because you NEED to find support for your belief that America is a racist land where Whites are out to get Blacks.