Redacted Affadavit officially released

[BWK]

Trump should have been reinstated, and then this would not even be an issue.

You would reinstate a bumbling idiot with bad intentions? Where is your self respect?

 

[BWK]

Derp…

Unclean!!

The Liberty Daily! Say no more. Another go to publication for the conspiracy nuts.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cn...iles/2022/08/26/govuscourtsflsd6178541021.pdf

the heavily redacted affidavit

Uh huh. Now what does the rest tell us?

 

[BWK]

Your lack of argument is noted. As is your love of a Nazi supporting country.

Do you know what a Nazi is?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So why did they leave the documents there.

If classified documents weren’t supposed to be there, it would be a crime by the FBI to leave them there.

Trump left them there, dope. He’s been asked repeatedly to turn them over. Even subpoenaed.
Why did he take them in the first place?

 

[BWK]

Uh hu. Now what does the rest tell us?

Just so you know, this is the same fool who got caught lying about his question whether the documents were de-classified, before he made the claim they were de-classified. And, he can't prove they were de-classified.

 

[BWK]

Trump left them there, dope. He’s been asked repeatedly to turn them over. Even subpoenaed.
Why did he take them in the first place?

Thank you! We aren't getting more than this.

 

[BackAgain]

Uh huh. Now what does the rest tell us?

Uh huh. Well, since the DOJ has begged to keep it concealed, you dope, we cannot know yet. Can we? What a typically retarded faux “question” from one of the middle of the road libtards.

 

[Lesh]

Just so you know, this is the same fool who got caught lying about his question whether the documents were de-classified, before he made the claim they were de-classified. And, he can't prove they were de-classified.

NO...you don't get it...he declassified them by THINKING it

 

[BackAgain]

They normally expose all this when charges are filed. Trump thought he would spoil the investigation when it implicated him even more.

Said ^ the libtarded BWK’n without any evidence.

 

[1srelluc]

Looks like you’re hedging.

What else is there to do given the redactions....Nothing new under the sun with that lined-out mess.

 

[BWK]

NO...you don't get it...he declassified them by THINKING it

My mistake.

 

[BWK]

Said ^ the libtarded BWK’n without any evidence.

How else would you do it? Throw all the witnesses and evidence to the wolves, making sure they lose their own case, while jeopardizing lives?

 

[BWK]

What else is there to do given the redactions....Nothing new under the sun with that lined-out mess.

Apparently Trumps band of goons don't think that; They are mounting a grievance/pity party defense; Hallie Jackson Reports on MSNBC

 

[BackAgain]

How else would you do it? Throw all the witnesses and evidence to the wolves, making sure they lose their own case, while jeopardizing lives?

You’re a dope.

It is one thing to redact identifying information about confidential sources. It is another thing entirely to redact almost all of the substantive portions of a search warrant application. That is especially true in THIS matter.

I know you’re ignorant and wouldn’t understand the concept, but it’s absolutely still the truth that a (prospective) trial is not supposed to be an ambush. That why we have this thing called “discovery.” The prosecution is obliged, sooner or later, to turn over their documentation and alleged “evidence” to the accused.

That being so, in a case of this historic magnitude, there is actually no valid basis for secrecy of this absurd magnitude. And this is even more true considering who they are thinking about accusing. Unlike the Clinton Crime Family, there’s no reason to believe that the accused would ever have a witness “suicided.”

 

[Rambunctious]

Judge Turley? Part of Trumps dog and pony show. Turns out Turley was wrong about the Mueller report. WRONG!

He was exactly right about Russian collusion... there wasn't any... Mueller failed to find any... if he had Trump would have been charged.... so what are you talking about peach fuzz?....

 

[Rambunctious]

Apparently Trumps band of goons don't think that; They are mounting a grievance/pity party defense; Hallie Jackson Reports on MSNBC

You lost today... big time.... no charges no prosecution is going to take place and Trump can and will still run in 24....

 

[Rambunctious]

Judge Turley? Part of Trumps dog and pony show. Turns out Turley was wrong about the Mueller report. WRONG!

Did you listen to your own NPR link?... buuuuaahahahahahaha

 

[g5000]

My guess probably half to two thirds of it will be redacted.

Nope. Less than half.

 

[BWK]

You’re a dope.

It is one thing to redact identifying information about confidential sources. It is another thing entirely to redact almost all of the substantive portions of a search warrant application. That is especially true in THIS matter.

I know you’re ignorant and wouldn’t understand the concept, but it’s absolutely still the truth that a (prospective) trial is not supposed to be an ambush. That why we have this thing called “discovery.” The prosecution is obliged, sooner or later, to turn over their documentation and alleged “evidence” to the accused.

That being so, in a case of this historic magnitude, there is actually no valid basis for secrecy of this absurd magnitude. And this is even more true considering who they are thinking about accusing. Unlike the Clinton Crime Family, there’s no reason to believe that the accused would ever have a witness “suicided.”

Substantive portions? What does that even mean?

Look Sling Blade, it's real simple. This investigation falls into one of two buckets. An investigation that protects material evidence and witnesses, or one that doesn't.
"Substantive portions" is just a criminals way of trying to get the investigators to give the store away. What you are suggesting is ludicrous. Sonny boy, you ain't none too bright if you expected them to do that. The investigators didn't take that bait. Trumps only defense now is the victimhood defense. That's not going to fly either; Hallie Jackson Reports on MSNBC