16. Why would you want to overwhelm the system with a rush of multiple 1000 page bills and debt?
Most bills are lengthy. They try to cover every possible situation and the process that supports what they want to do. Very many times, when put into practice, gaps appear and laws have to be amended to account for things that were not considered. By and large the track record is pretty good.
A lot of bills refer to existing code, cross reference it and or replace or repeal items within. So there's a lot more to it, and less to it, except you need to be able to navigate around the arrangement of the provisions. Then there are supporting documentation and appendices and studies, statistics, and indices than can be referred to, updated, redacted and so on and so forth. All of these things are mentioned and follow a certain format.
The state legislation I worked on included 2000 page hydrology reports, maps, flow data, soil composition testing, discharge permitting, emissions reports, EPA laws, state EPA laws.......way more than 1000 pages. The law was way shorter but depended on all sorts of ancillary data. Somebody had to read it and understand it and be able to answer questions about it. I was one of those. I'm sure the state senators didn't have a clue. So they got briefed on the short version and the intent. The EPA concurred and managed all the submitted data and reported back to the pols. That's the way it is supposed to work.