Racist Black Judge Railroading Amber Guyger

[bodecea]

This is real cop murder, not what Amber did.

Caution: Graphic

Yes...for sure. Most blacks do not know that cops kill more whites than of any other race.

That's not what they have lived with for decades.

Blacks know better than anyone that they are more racist than anyone else.

What they live with is ignorance and stupidity that is what holds them back...yet they want to blame others...they need to get their own house in order.

^ This is not a racist post from a Right winger.

 

[bodecea]

No racism here, Jitler.

the libbies always play the race card.

Look...the Race Card Card.

That is the great tragedy of this case...it was portrayed as a evil white racist shoots unarmed black. The jury could not reject that. Being of the minority persuasion aka all whites are racists especially any police officer who shoots a black for whatever reason.

Texas Murder Law:

Texas does not officially use the term "second degree murder" which can sometimes be a little bit confusing. Instead, the equivalent in Texas is known as just "murder," which is a first degree felony. To convict a defendant of murder, prosecutors must be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:

• The defendant intentionally and knowingly caused the death of another person;
• The defendant intended to cause serious bodily injury and committed an act that was clearly dangerous to human life and this act caused the death of an individual; or
• The defendant committed or attempted to commit a felony (other than manslaughter) and in performing that felony, committed an act that was clearly dangerous to human life and this act caused the death of an individual.

The defendant illegally entered the victim's home, took out her gun and shot him. How is this not murder?

There really is no defence for her entering the wrong apartment, and all of your scenarios are based on the idea that she could not possibly know that she wasn't in her own apartment. The door mat, the number on the door, the apearance of the place when she opened the door.

People have testified that they have went to the wrong floor went to the wrong door many times . Z

STOP making up your own evidence

How many of them shot the actual owners?

 

[Rigby5]

What stupidity.....first of all you do not even know the facts of the case and what does it matter what the nigha was eating...why post irrelevant crap. Trayvon was eating skittles...did that make him innocent? But in just about every msm story they talked abougt trayvon eating skittles like that was somehow a factor.

Of course, it was a factor. He went to the store to pick up some candy for his little brother. Zimmerman assumed he was a criminal and murdered him in the street. This guy was eating ice cream in his living room, he should have had a reasonable expectation that he wouldn't be shot while eating ice cream in his own home.

Nonsense....Zimmerman was just doing his job as a watchman....he had many opportuntities to shoot blacks before yet he never did.

Zimmerman rightfully thought trayvon looked suspicious and called the police to come check him out as was his usual operating procedure.

Of course the black had a right to eat ice cream to his hearts content in complete safety....but shit happens. This world is full of danger...if had understood that he would have locked his front door.

What stupidity.....first of all you do not even know the facts of the case and what does it matter what the nigha was eating...why post irrelevant crap. Trayvon was eating skittles...did that make him innocent? But in just about every msm story they talked abougt trayvon eating skittles like that was somehow a factor.

Of course, it was a factor. He went to the store to pick up some candy for his little brother. Zimmerman assumed he was a criminal and murdered him in the street. This guy was eating ice cream in his living room, he should have had a reasonable expectation that he wouldn't be shot while eating ice cream in his own home.

What stupidity.....first of all you do not even know the facts of the case and what does it matter what the nigha was eating...why post irrelevant crap. Trayvon was eating skittles...did that make him innocent? But in just about every msm story they talked abougt trayvon eating skittles like that was somehow a factor.

Of course, it was a factor. He went to the store to pick up some candy for his little brother. Zimmerman assumed he was a criminal and murdered him in the street. This guy was eating ice cream in his living room, he should have had a reasonable expectation that he wouldn't be shot while eating ice cream in his own home.

Wrong.
Zimmerman was not a member of Neighborhood Watch or any organization or in any official capacity.
The dispatcher told him specifically not to follow Martin.
That is because it is a crime to follow someone at night in an intimidating way.
Zimmerman could not claim the Castle Doctrine or Stand Your Ground because he caused the situation to happen.
But he was let off because there was no one to counter his claim that he was being killed by his head being beaten into the sidewalk. I do not believe it, but he only fired one shot, so there is still reasonable doubt.

With Botham Jean, eating ice cream is relevant because that is not something a burglar would do.

Zimmerman was the neighborhood watch coordinator in his gated community; Martin was temporarily staying there and was shot there.

The Twin Lakes Neighborhood Watch program was not registered with the National Neighborhood Watch Program, but was administered by the local police

That is just a lie.

Zimmerman went to one Neighborhood Watch meeting, but was not interested because they explained that Neighborhood Watch is NEVER allowed to be armed or work alone.
Zimmerman also owned nothing in this gated community, and was staying at his father's house.

Twin Lakes Neighborhood Watch program is registered with the National Neighborhood Watch Program and is NOT administered by the police. Police do not and can not administer a volunteer program.
Zimmerman simply refused to join.

 

[Grumblenuts]

^^^NOT RACIST^^^ ^^^NOT!!!^^^

Most intelligent people understand how stupid blacks are....average i.q. of 85.....being one you should know.

Mean while this black guy was smart enough to get in his own apartment and she was not. Ever notice how this only happens with PD cops? This shit does n ot happen with the FBI or the SHP, of course they require you have a brain to be a member. Mean while you can score to high on the civil service test to be a PD.

That was a rather common mistake in that complex.

If it was rather common, she should not have been surprised

I actually got into the wrong car once in a parking lot before I realized it wasnt mine. This DOES happen

You double tapped the owner?

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Nonsense....Zimmerman was just doing his job as a watchman....he had many opportuntities to shoot blacks before yet he never did.

Zimmerman rightfully thought trayvon looked suspicious and called the police to come check him out as was his usual operating procedure.

Okay. The cops told him not to chase the kid down, he did anyway.
He never identified himself as a watchman... nor was he on duty as a watchman.

Of course the black had a right to eat ice cream to his hearts content in complete safety....but shit happens. This world is full of danger...if had understood that he would have locked his front door.

One should not be in danger from a police officer who was too drunk, distracted or tired.

Hope this ***** serves the whole 10 years.

The cops did not tell him not to chase Trayvon....he never chased him...was merely trying to follow him to answer the dispatchers question of where had he run off to....the dispatcher with no legal authority over Z was the one who told him they did not need him to try and follow trayvon.

Zimmerman was on his way to the store when he saw the suspicious fellow now known as trayvon....like any good citizen he reported the suspicious person to the police and then waited for them to arrive as was his usual operating procedure.

When the dispatcher asked Z where had trayvon run off to Z got out of his vehicle in order to try and determine where Trayvon had gone or if he was gone....he could not see that well on a dark and rainy night.

You should have watched the trial.

That is not accurate.
The dispatcher most definitely told Zimmerman not to follow or chase Martin.
That is because following someone at night is illegal because it is intimidating.

The dispatcher did not ask where Martin had run off to.
He only asked where the police could find Zimmerman, so that the appropriate paperwork could be filled out.

Zimmerman most definitely did NOT wait for the police.
Instead you can hear him running after Martin.
From the map, we can see he ran several blocks from his SUV, and got in front of Martin, cutting him off from his way home.

Nonsense....if you had watched the trial you would know better.

Here is the transcript of the call Z made to the dispatcher................Transcript of George Zimmerman's Call to the Police

 

[bodecea]

The mob demanded and got the charge raised from manslaughter to murder. The DA violated a gag order to pander to the mob on camera. The mob's lawyer said this was "justice" for Trayvon. Now the same DA's office that violated the gag order is showing internet memes to prejudice the jury at sentencing, and the judge is allowing it. The mob is going to get their pound of flesh.

I believe she has a good chance at a appeal.

Bookmarked.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

There is a law which says that if you accidentally kill someone in the commission of another crime, the charge automatically becomes second degree murder. For example, if you rob a grocery store, and you accidentally shoot the owner during the robbery, that's second degree murder, even though you had no intention of killing the owner when you went in. Because the woman illegally entered the apartment her shooting of the owner is not manslaughter, it's second degree murder.

Lol so you think she intentionally broke into the apartment ?? Why do you fabricate falsehoods?

Exactly...and not even to mention that in Texas there is no such thing as second degree murder.

She was charged with murder....outrageous.

If you shoot a dude in the hart in his own home then that's murder. The prosecution asked her a good question on the stand. They asked (and I paraphrase here) "did you mean to kill the guy?) . Go head and Google the answer to that question. The dumb blond commited murder. She was convicted of murder. Justice was served. But, if you really care, feel free to donate to the Amber Gieger defense fund. Also, there is another lesson in all this. WATCH THE SHIT YOU TEXT! Those had allot to do with this woman being found guilty.

Lol SHE THOUGHT SHE WAS IN HER APARTMENT! We have a right to protect our self. This was a fluke accident.. why do you hate so much?

That's what she claims, even tho there were all these OBVIOUS clues that she wasn't at her own apartment.

Why would she try to enter an apartment that was not her own....ridiculouos idea.

She parked on the wrong floor of the parking garage...a very easy thing to do....then off on the wrong floor with all the apartments looking the same she made a mistake that had been made in that complex more than once.

 

[bodecea]

The mob demanded and got the charge raised from manslaughter to murder. The DA violated a gag order to pander to the mob on camera. The mob's lawyer said this was "justice" for Trayvon. Now the same DA's office that violated the gag order is showing internet memes to prejudice the jury at sentencing, and the judge is allowing it. The mob is going to get their pound of flesh.

So outrageous....a shame on Texas.

There is real Texas and then there are the big city shitholes. Dallas, Houston, El Paso, Austin are just like all the other big city shitholes run by Democrats put into office by idiot minorities that we see all over the US.

Apparently, to you, a city is a shithole when cops can't get away with going into someone else's home, shoot and kill them..........and can't get away with it.

 

[Crixus]

There is a law which says that if you accidentally kill someone in the commission of another crime, the charge automatically becomes second degree murder. For example, if you rob a grocery store, and you accidentally shoot the owner during the robbery, that's second degree murder, even though you had no intention of killing the owner when you went in. Because the woman illegally entered the apartment her shooting of the owner is not manslaughter, it's second degree murder.

Lol so you think she intentionally broke into the apartment ?? Why do you fabricate falsehoods?

Exactly...and not even to mention that in Texas there is no such thing as second degree murder.

She was charged with murder....outrageous.

If you shoot a dude in the hart in his own home then that's murder. The prosecution asked her a good question on the stand. They asked (and I paraphrase here) "did you mean to kill the guy?) . Go head and Google the answer to that question. The dumb blond commited murder. She was convicted of murder. Justice was served. But, if you really care, feel free to donate to the Amber Gieger defense fund. Also, there is another lesson in all this. WATCH THE SHIT YOU TEXT! Those had allot to do with this woman being found guilty.

Lol SHE THOUGHT SHE WAS IN HER APARTMENT! We have a right to protect our self. This was a fluke accident.. why do you hate so much?

That's what she claims, even tho there were all these OBVIOUS clues that she wasn't at her own apartment.

None of that matters. In the end the question was, did she mean to shoot him. She did. She was sent to prison for 10 years. Fin.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Lol so you think she intentionally broke into the apartment ?? Why do you fabricate falsehoods?

Exactly...and not even to mention that in Texas there is no such thing as second degree murder.

She was charged with murder....outrageous.

If you shoot a dude in the hart in his own home then that's murder. The prosecution asked her a good question on the stand. They asked (and I paraphrase here) "did you mean to kill the guy?) . Go head and Google the answer to that question. The dumb blond commited murder. She was convicted of murder. Justice was served. But, if you really care, feel free to donate to the Amber Gieger defense fund. Also, there is another lesson in all this. WATCH THE SHIT YOU TEXT! Those had allot to do with this woman being found guilty.

Lol SHE THOUGHT SHE WAS IN HER APARTMENT! We have a right to protect our self. This was a fluke accident.. why do you hate so much?

That's what she claims, even tho there were all these OBVIOUS clues that she wasn't at her own apartment.

Why would she try to enter an apartment that was not her own....ridiculouos idea.

She parked on the wrong floor of the parking garage...a very easy thing to do....then off on the wrong floor with all the apartments looking the same she made a mistake that had been made in that complex more than once.

Bottom line: people make mistakes. Crucify her for that but she was not guilty of murder.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Lol so you think she intentionally broke into the apartment ?? Why do you fabricate falsehoods?

Exactly...and not even to mention that in Texas there is no such thing as second degree murder.

She was charged with murder....outrageous.

If you shoot a dude in the hart in his own home then that's murder. The prosecution asked her a good question on the stand. They asked (and I paraphrase here) "did you mean to kill the guy?) . Go head and Google the answer to that question. The dumb blond commited murder. She was convicted of murder. Justice was served. But, if you really care, feel free to donate to the Amber Gieger defense fund. Also, there is another lesson in all this. WATCH THE SHIT YOU TEXT! Those had allot to do with this woman being found guilty.

Lol SHE THOUGHT SHE WAS IN HER APARTMENT! We have a right to protect our self. This was a fluke accident.. why do you hate so much?

That's what she claims, even tho there were all these OBVIOUS clues that she wasn't at her own apartment.

None of that matters. In the end the question was, did she mean to shoot him. She did. She was sent to prison for 10 years. Fin.

No you got it wrong because you do not understand the law on self defense.

She will appeal and very likely get a new trial.

 

[bodecea]

"we have to stop blaming an entire race for individual actions."

True. Like repeating violent crime statistics to smear an entire "race." Still,. I wonder,..

How many whites gunned down by blacks in their own living rooms while trying to eat ice cream?

If you look at actual states, blacks commit far more violent crimes against whites. This is not to smear blacks, but does refute your smearing of whites.

That has to do with this case........how?

 

[bodecea]

Texas Murder Law:

The defendant illegally entered the victim's home, took out her gun and shot him. How is this not murder?

There really is no defence for her entering the wrong apartment.

someone else who does not know the law....according to blacks law dictionary she committed innocent trespass....unknowingly entering someone elses apartment...thus what she did was not illegal it was simply a mistake.

From Black's Law dictionary..... 'Innocent Trespass: A trespass committed either unintentionally or in good faith'

Thinking she was in her own apartment and that obviously the black guy was a intruder she reasonably believed her life was in danger...thus by law she was entitled to use lethal force.

You were going good up until you said she reasonably believed her life was in danger and was entitled to use lethal force

Even her own police department fired her for her violation of policy in the use of lethal force

.

Get real ....big city police depts are ruled by political correctness....they are scared shitless of being sued so they go overboard to protect blacks and even turn on their own when the politicians that control police depts. demand it.

Entering a wrong apartment and killing the occupant is not political correctness

The prosecution turning the case into one of a racist motivated murder is.

How so? Show us that to be true from linking such prosecution assertions in the trial transcripts.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

"we have to stop blaming an entire race for individual actions."

True. Like repeating violent crime statistics to smear an entire "race." Still,. I wonder,..

How many whites gunned down by blacks in their own living rooms while trying to eat ice cream?

If you look at actual states, blacks commit far more violent crimes against whites. This is not to smear blacks, but does refute your smearing of whites.

That has to do with this case........how?

He just explained it to you dummy...are you really that stupid or do you have a problem with your glasses?

 

[bodecea]

When there is not an intent to kill somebody and it is "accidental" (broad interpretation) then the charge is usually manslaughter.

For instance, a couple of years ago here in Florida a drunk driver ran into a car of teenagers killing the driver and hurting the other occupants. Totally responsible. The driver was charged with manslaughter, not murder.

She was originally charged with manslaughter, which was appropriate. However, for SJW reasons the charge was changed to murder and that is despicable.

She was railroaded for political correctness and that is wrong.

It was also wrong for the family to frame the shooting as a racial thing when there is no evidence of it being racially motivated. May they rot in hell for that.

The most she should have been charged with was negligent homicide as in she was negligent by confusing his apartment with hers...though it was her mistake it has been shown the complex contributed to this by not clearly identifying apartments which in that complex all looked the same...and this was a common mistake in that complex...so the negligence was not solely based on the police officer making a mistake ...as in there were contributing factors....thus I hold she should not have been charged with anything....just a terrible mistake. What are the odds? A police officer goes to the wrong apt. and that apt front door is open. I say bad karma....either on the black guy or the police officer or maybe on them both. Bad things happen...even accidentally ...the apt. complex is just as guilty as the police officer for the mistake. As has been pointed out many times...many residents there had also made the mistake of going to the wrong apartment.....and then on here you have some claiming she broke in etc. etc. not knowing the facts of the case.

Yes, living in an apartment complex, we sometimes get off on the wrong floor, but here's the thing. Every apartment has a number on the door. I got off the elevator on the wrong floor in my friend Larry's building. All of the floors look exactly the same. I went to the door, and the number on the door said 518. Larry lives in 618. I went back to the elevator. Every apartment building I have ever been in has the apartment number on the door.

There was testimony at trial that the deceased's apartment had a welcome mat outside his door. The shooter did not. So in spite of the number on the apartment door, the welcome mat she did not own, she still entered the apartment, pulled out her gun, and shot the man who lived there.

This requires a whole lot more than "negligence" and "negligent homicide" is not the appropriate charge. She made overt moves to deliberately shoot the man.

!

Bullshit!!!

She made a honest mistake...the same mistake a lot of people have made that live in that complex.

Your personal experience is completely irrelevant and you are wasting board space with that.

When the police officer was confronted she followed police procedure in which she was well trained....she issued a lawful order for the victim to show his hands...he must have realized she was a police officer because she was in uniform...he ignored her order and advanced on her...in fear of her life and with good reason she used her weapon to defend her life...case closed. Miscarriage of justice which will certainly be over-turned for more than one reason.

"Honest mistake", eh....oh, makes it all better, doesn't it?

As has been explained how many times already? This was a tragedy anyway you look at it....but convicting a innocent woman does not remedy anything...just further exacerbates the tragedy.

"innocent woman"? She shot him. She killed him in his own home. There is no innocence in that.

 

[bodecea]

Lol so you think she intentionally broke into the apartment ?? Why do you fabricate falsehoods?

Exactly...and not even to mention that in Texas there is no such thing as second degree murder.

She was charged with murder....outrageous.

If you shoot a dude in the hart in his own home then that's murder. The prosecution asked her a good question on the stand. They asked (and I paraphrase here) "did you mean to kill the guy?) . Go head and Google the answer to that question. The dumb blond commited murder. She was convicted of murder. Justice was served. But, if you really care, feel free to donate to the Amber Gieger defense fund. Also, there is another lesson in all this. WATCH THE SHIT YOU TEXT! Those had allot to do with this woman being found guilty.

Lol SHE THOUGHT SHE WAS IN HER APARTMENT! We have a right to protect our self. This was a fluke accident.. why do you hate so much?

Yet she had the presence of mind to sext with one of her work buddy's just before shooting the guy? Perhaps if the stupid cow was t looking at her phone she would have found her house? She was justly charged, tried and convicted. In the end she gets to go back to setting her pal's. Mr. Jean won't be eating any ice cream in HIS house. She commits murder and was convicted of such. Deal with it.

Who do you hate more.....police officers or women?

I suspect that most Americans hate it when women police officers go into someone else's home and shoot them dead. It's the actions, not the person. You seem to not be able to grasp that. It DOES require some higher level thinking.

 

[bodecea]

Lol so you think she intentionally broke into the apartment ?? Why do you fabricate falsehoods?

Exactly...and not even to mention that in Texas there is no such thing as second degree murder.

She was charged with murder....outrageous.

If you shoot a dude in the hart in his own home then that's murder. The prosecution asked her a good question on the stand. They asked (and I paraphrase here) "did you mean to kill the guy?) . Go head and Google the answer to that question. The dumb blond commited murder. She was convicted of murder. Justice was served. But, if you really care, feel free to donate to the Amber Gieger defense fund. Also, there is another lesson in all this. WATCH THE SHIT YOU TEXT! Those had allot to do with this woman being found guilty.

Lol SHE THOUGHT SHE WAS IN HER APARTMENT! We have a right to protect our self. This was a fluke accident.. why do you hate so much?

Yet she had the presence of mind to sext with one of her work buddy's just before shooting the guy? Perhaps if the stupid cow was t looking at her phone she would have found her house? She was justly charged, tried and convicted. In the end she gets to go back to setting her pal's. Mr. Jean won't be eating any ice cream in HIS house. She commits murder and was convicted of such. Deal with it.

She made a honest mistake...people do that all the time.

What are the odds that the apartment she mistakenly went to had a open door...she merely tried to insert her key and the door opened....she stepped in to what she honestly thought was her apartment....great tragedy for all.

If justice is to be served...this wrongful conviction will be over-turned on appeal.

Next....hopefully someone not saturated with hate.

"honest mistake"?

 

[georgephillip]

Briefly, the small white police woman got off the elevator on the wrong floor (as have dozens of others) of her apartment building, walked into what she thought was her apartment after a 13 hour duty day and was confronted by a large black man who lived in that apartment. She was still in uniform. Believing she was in her apartment, she told the man to show his hands. He refused. He started moving toward her in the dark. She drew her service weapon and double-tapped him. He died shortly thereafter.

The judge is a large, belching, yawning, stretching black woman named Tammy Kemp. So far she has ignored a defense motion for mistrial since the DA defied a court order and gave the media an interview about the case, poisoning the jury pool. She has allowed a favorable picture of the victim to be placed in front of the jury. She has denied the defense expert testimony from police officers and experts in police shootings three times, not allowing the defense to defend their client. She's sure to get a conviction the way she's run this trial and sure to be overturned on appeal. It's obvious she wants to put this little white women in a prison at the mercy of her fellow-gigantic soul sisters.

Judge blocks testimony that Dallas cop acted reasonably in shooting neighbor

Botham Jean Family’s Lawyer Hails White Cop’s Murder Conviction as “Precedent-Setting Case” | Democracy Now!

"After the jury returned its verdict, prosecutors introduced racist and offensive text messages and social media posts written by Guyger, in which she joked about Martin Luther King Jr.’s death and called herself a racist."
Which one's the snowflake?

 

[bodecea]

Lol so you think she intentionally broke into the apartment ?? Why do you fabricate falsehoods?

Exactly...and not even to mention that in Texas there is no such thing as second degree murder.

She was charged with murder....outrageous.

If you shoot a dude in the hart in his own home then that's murder. The prosecution asked her a good question on the stand. They asked (and I paraphrase here) "did you mean to kill the guy?) . Go head and Google the answer to that question. The dumb blond commited murder. She was convicted of murder. Justice was served. But, if you really care, feel free to donate to the Amber Gieger defense fund. Also, there is another lesson in all this. WATCH THE SHIT YOU TEXT! Those had allot to do with this woman being found guilty.

Lol SHE THOUGHT SHE WAS IN HER APARTMENT! We have a right to protect our self. This was a fluke accident.. why do you hate so much?

Yet she had the presence of mind to sext with one of her work buddy's just before shooting the guy? Perhaps if the stupid cow was t looking at her phone she would have found her house? She was justly charged, tried and convicted. In the end she gets to go back to setting her pal's. Mr. Jean won't be eating any ice cream in HIS house. She commits murder and was convicted of such. Deal with it.

No she didn’t and it will be appealed and she will be released after a year or two.. eating I’ve cream with her man haha

Laughing at the death of an innocent man in his own home. Karma coming?

 

[bodecea]

If you shoot a dude in the hart in his own home then that's murder. The prosecution asked her a good question on the stand. They asked (and I paraphrase here) "did you mean to kill the guy?) . Go head and Google the answer to that question. The dumb blond commited murder. She was convicted of murder. Justice was served. But, if you really care, feel free to donate to the Amber Gieger defense fund. Also, there is another lesson in all this. WATCH THE SHIT YOU TEXT! Those had allot to do with this woman being found guilty.

Lol SHE THOUGHT SHE WAS IN HER APARTMENT! We have a right to protect our self. This was a fluke accident.. why do you hate so much?

Yet she had the presence of mind to sext with one of her work buddy's just before shooting the guy? Perhaps if the stupid cow was t looking at her phone she would have found her house? She was justly charged, tried and convicted. In the end she gets to go back to setting her pal's. Mr. Jean won't be eating any ice cream in HIS house. She commits murder and was convicted of such. Deal with it.

Who do you hate more.....police officers or women?

Dumb folks in general. I tend to fear stupid bitches with guns more though.

Will you move to Canada when she is released havaing ice cream? lol

Karma?