Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 3,231
- 794
- 140
" Racialism Versus Racism Terms Beset By Double Speak Think Fallacies Of Anti Racist Racists "
* When Law Against Discriminating Between Religions Is Illegitimate Aggression Against Self Ownership And Self Determination *
The current vernacular of political correct dogma chooses to disavow a distinction between the term racism and racialism based upon a legal positive and willful ignorance premise that any decision based on race is illegitimate aggression .
As a formal definition unrestrained by putrid politically correct absurdities , the terms racism and racialism are not equivalent .
The term racism must necessarily include acts that violate principles of non violence or individualism based on race , while the term racialism must necessary exclude acts that do not violate principle of non violence and individualism .
For example , black awards , black news , black whatever , latino , etc . which are private organizations promoting some racial clad , whose actions do not violate principles of non violence or individualism , are understood to be acting with racialism and not with racism .
Where us government is proscribed from making a law respecting an establishment of religion , or the free expression thereof , there is not a distinction between a religion and the tenets and edicts of creed which comprise the religion of an individual , and there is not an exception for a religion with tenets or edicts of creed that violate non violence principles .
While much concentration is afforded to freedom of speech in first amendment of us constitution , a core issue of more compelling contention is where the tenets or edicts of creed in religion of an individual promote the representation and well being for individuals for some racial clad through acts of racialism and not by acts of racism .
The contemporary political agenda of anti-racist racists rejecting a distinction between the terms racialism and racism are seeking to violate the establishment clause by urging congress to make laws that respect the religion of one group of individuals to promote the representation and well being for members of some racial clad , while at the same time depriving other individuals of the free exercise of their religion to promote the representation and well being for member of some racial clad .
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[3]
* When Law Against Discriminating Between Religions Is Illegitimate Aggression Against Self Ownership And Self Determination *
The current vernacular of political correct dogma chooses to disavow a distinction between the term racism and racialism based upon a legal positive and willful ignorance premise that any decision based on race is illegitimate aggression .
As a formal definition unrestrained by putrid politically correct absurdities , the terms racism and racialism are not equivalent .
The term racism must necessarily include acts that violate principles of non violence or individualism based on race , while the term racialism must necessary exclude acts that do not violate principle of non violence and individualism .
For example , black awards , black news , black whatever , latino , etc . which are private organizations promoting some racial clad , whose actions do not violate principles of non violence or individualism , are understood to be acting with racialism and not with racism .
Where us government is proscribed from making a law respecting an establishment of religion , or the free expression thereof , there is not a distinction between a religion and the tenets and edicts of creed which comprise the religion of an individual , and there is not an exception for a religion with tenets or edicts of creed that violate non violence principles .
While much concentration is afforded to freedom of speech in first amendment of us constitution , a core issue of more compelling contention is where the tenets or edicts of creed in religion of an individual promote the representation and well being for individuals for some racial clad through acts of racialism and not by acts of racism .
The contemporary political agenda of anti-racist racists rejecting a distinction between the terms racialism and racism are seeking to violate the establishment clause by urging congress to make laws that respect the religion of one group of individuals to promote the representation and well being for members of some racial clad , while at the same time depriving other individuals of the free exercise of their religion to promote the representation and well being for member of some racial clad .
First Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Last edited: