Quick Reference Guide to Media Leaks

DonGlock26

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2024
Messages
19,780
Reaction score
28,858
Points
2,288
"This reference resource is based on historic patterns and generally has an 80/20 accuracy rate. While there are some leaks that cross through the data pattern, in the aggregate this basic outline has shown to be correct.

The leak source identification can help interested political observers understand the motives and objectives.

When you see the term “exclusive” in the originating media report, this guide increases in accuracy:

The State Department leaks to CNN
The CIA leaks to The Washington Post
The DOJ/FBI leaks to The New York Times and Politico
DHS domestically leaks to the Wall Street Journal
The National Security Council leaks primarily to Axios and Politico, NYT secondary
The Pentagon leaks to Fox News and the Wall Street Journal (Axios more recent)
Kash Patel leaks to John Solomon – Just The News
¹DNI leaks to the Wall Street Journal, however:
¹The ODNI gets a little complicated due to the structure of the ODNI. Each intelligence agency has a liaison office inside the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Generally, the topline guide above overlays with the desk assignment.

Example 1: CNN gets an ‘exclusive’ leak related to the DNI; the leak sourcing is therefore most likely to be the State Dept Desk inside the DNI office. (State Dept leaks to CNN)

Example 2: Washington Post gets an ‘exclusive’ leak related to the DNI. The leak sourcing is directly from the CIA liaison desk inside DNI. (CIA leaks to WaPo)"




I thought this might be useful. I've noticed that the Deep State seems to have their favorite reporters/ news agencies.
 
Here's one deterrent for all those leaks..............

1781978872460.webp


here's another..........

1781978938994.webp
 
"This reference resource is based on historic patterns and generally has an 80/20 accuracy rate. While there are some leaks that cross through the data pattern, in the aggregate this basic outline has shown to be correct.

The leak source identification can help interested political observers understand the motives and objectives.

When you see the term “exclusive” in the originating media report, this guide increases in accuracy:

The State Department leaks to CNN
The CIA leaks to The Washington Post
The DOJ/FBI leaks to The New York Times and Politico
DHS domestically leaks to the Wall Street Journal
The National Security Council leaks primarily to Axios and Politico, NYT secondary
The Pentagon leaks to Fox News and the Wall Street Journal (Axios more recent)
Kash Patel leaks to John Solomon – Just The News
¹DNI leaks to the Wall Street Journal, however:
¹The ODNI gets a little complicated due to the structure of the ODNI. Each intelligence agency has a liaison office inside the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Generally, the topline guide above overlays with the desk assignment.

Example 1: CNN gets an ‘exclusive’ leak related to the DNI; the leak sourcing is therefore most likely to be the State Dept Desk inside the DNI office. (State Dept leaks to CNN)

Example 2: Washington Post gets an ‘exclusive’ leak related to the DNI. The leak sourcing is directly from the CIA liaison desk inside DNI. (CIA leaks to WaPo)"




I thought this might be useful. I've noticed that the Deep State seems to have their favorite reporters/ news agencies.
You mean Administration Leaks.

The media is not leaking anything. They are merely doing their job - reporting.
 
You mean Administration Leaks.

The media is not leaking anything. They are merely doing their job - reporting.


What part of these sentences escape you?
The State Department leaks to CNN
The CIA leaks to The Washington Post
The DOJ/FBI leaks to The New York Times and Politico
DHS domestically leaks to the Wall Street Journal
The National Security Council leaks primarily to Axios and Politico, NYT secondary
The Pentagon leaks to Fox News and the Wall Street Journal (Axios more recent)
Kash Patel leaks to John Solomon – Just The News
¹DNI leaks to the Wall Street Journal, however:
¹The ODNI gets a little complicated due to the structure of the ODNI. Each intelligence agency has a liaison office inside the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Generally, the topline guide above overlays with the desk assignment.
 
"This reference resource is based on historic patterns and generally has an 80/20 accuracy rate. While there are some leaks that cross through the data pattern, in the aggregate this basic outline has shown to be correct.

The leak source identification can help interested political observers understand the motives and objectives.

When you see the term “exclusive” in the originating media report, this guide increases in accuracy:

The State Department leaks to CNN
The CIA leaks to The Washington Post
The DOJ/FBI leaks to The New York Times and Politico
DHS domestically leaks to the Wall Street Journal
The National Security Council leaks primarily to Axios and Politico, NYT secondary
The Pentagon leaks to Fox News and the Wall Street Journal (Axios more recent)
Kash Patel leaks to John Solomon – Just The News
¹DNI leaks to the Wall Street Journal, however:
¹The ODNI gets a little complicated due to the structure of the ODNI. Each intelligence agency has a liaison office inside the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Generally, the topline guide above overlays with the desk assignment.

Example 1: CNN gets an ‘exclusive’ leak related to the DNI; the leak sourcing is therefore most likely to be the State Dept Desk inside the DNI office. (State Dept leaks to CNN)

Example 2: Washington Post gets an ‘exclusive’ leak related to the DNI. The leak sourcing is directly from the CIA liaison desk inside DNI. (CIA leaks to WaPo)"




I thought this might be useful. I've noticed that the Deep State seems to have their favorite reporters/ news agencies.
Crazy people say crazy things like Deep State. Are the Israeli made space lasers still starting California wildfires, Marge? :abgg2q.jpg:
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom