Question

Consider the numbers. So far nearly twenty times as many dead Palestinians than Israel's & growing since the Palestinians began the conflict firing rocket missiles at Israel. And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict. It's called Palestinian Mentality.

Ten people, including two children, have been killed in rocket attacks on Israel since the fighting began last Monday, Israel said. The overall death toll in Gaza now stands at 197 people, including 58 children and 34 women, with 1,230 injured, according to the Hamas-controlled health ministry.1 day ago
And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict.
Israel's military has been pounding Palestinian civilians for over seven decades and has not won yet.
Do you not believe Israel is capable of a far greater massacre of Palestinians? Let the Pali's keep it up long enough & you will live & learn.
Israel is shooting itself in the foot. The more Palestinians it kills, the less support it gets worldwide.
May I suggest you go back to the OP & answer the question -- what would you do?
If Israel would stop making enemies, it would not have to "defend itself."
Israel recently signed accords to normalize relations with Arab nations in the region. It was on the news. You missed it?
 
Consider the numbers. So far nearly twenty times as many dead Palestinians than Israel's & growing since the Palestinians began the conflict firing rocket missiles at Israel. And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict. It's called Palestinian Mentality.

Ten people, including two children, have been killed in rocket attacks on Israel since the fighting began last Monday, Israel said. The overall death toll in Gaza now stands at 197 people, including 58 children and 34 women, with 1,230 injured, according to the Hamas-controlled health ministry.1 day ago
And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict.
Israel's military has been pounding Palestinian civilians for over seven decades and has not won yet.
Do you not believe Israel is capable of a far greater massacre of Palestinians? Let the Pali's keep it up long enough & you will live & learn.
Israel is shooting itself in the foot. The more Palestinians it kills, the less support it gets worldwide.
May I suggest you go back to the OP & answer the question -- what would you do?
If Israel would stop making enemies, it would not have to "defend itself."
Israel recently signed accords to normalize relations with Arab nations in the region. It was on the news. You missed it?
So?
 
RE Question
SUBTOPIC: Violation of the Geneva Convention
※→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

PREFACE: The Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) are NOT concerned with the maintenance of peace and security and for the development of Co-operation among the Regional Members of the Middle East North African, the Arabian Sea, and the Gulf States. Strengthening regional peace and the development in promoting the Rule of Law (RoL) are NOT on the agenda for the HoAP.

BLUF: The entire purpose of the HoAP clashes with Israel is to disrupt the Peace to demonstrate that recent Israel's inroads into peace are merely cosmetic and the HoAP is the real determining factor in Arab-Israeli advances towards peace in the region. It is a form of coercion.

P F Tinmore said:
(COMMENT)

As long as the HoAP has the ability to disrupt the peace between Israel and the Arab League members in the Middle East North African, the Arabian Sea, the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, and the Persian Gulf regions, so do they determine the status of peace.

IF the HoAP are successful in reorienting the stance on "peace". THEN they hold the power to restore and ensure public order and safety. THEY will drive the peace agenda for the entire Arab League.


1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
Consider the numbers. So far nearly twenty times as many dead Palestinians than Israel's & growing since the Palestinians began the conflict firing rocket missiles at Israel. And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict. It's called Palestinian Mentality.

Ten people, including two children, have been killed in rocket attacks on Israel since the fighting began last Monday, Israel said. The overall death toll in Gaza now stands at 197 people, including 58 children and 34 women, with 1,230 injured, according to the Hamas-controlled health ministry.1 day ago
And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict.
Israel's military has been pounding Palestinian civilians for over seven decades and has not won yet.
Do you not believe Israel is capable of a far greater massacre of Palestinians? Let the Pali's keep it up long enough & you will live & learn.
Israel is shooting itself in the foot. The more Palestinians it kills, the less support it gets worldwide.
May I suggest you go back to the OP & answer the question -- what would you do?
If Israel would stop making enemies, it would not have to "defend itself."
Why do you avoid the question --- what would you do? On the OP?
 
Consider the numbers. So far nearly twenty times as many dead Palestinians than Israel's & growing since the Palestinians began the conflict firing rocket missiles at Israel. And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict. It's called Palestinian Mentality.

Ten people, including two children, have been killed in rocket attacks on Israel since the fighting began last Monday, Israel said. The overall death toll in Gaza now stands at 197 people, including 58 children and 34 women, with 1,230 injured, according to the Hamas-controlled health ministry.1 day ago
And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict.
Israel's military has been pounding Palestinian civilians for over seven decades and has not won yet.
Do you not believe Israel is capable of a far greater massacre of Palestinians? Let the Pali's keep it up long enough & you will live & learn.
Israel is shooting itself in the foot. The more Palestinians it kills, the less support it gets worldwide.
May I suggest you go back to the OP & answer the question -- what would you do?
If Israel would stop making enemies, it would not have to "defend itself."
Israel recently signed accords to normalize relations with Arab nations in the region. It was on the news. You missed it?
So?
Masterful concision.

Have you noticed that the UAE, for example, is not rushing to defend the Pals and their Shia Iranian weapon suppliers?

The Arab nations in the area have taken a much different posture regarding this kerfuffle vs. 5 years ago. Why do you think that is?

__________ <------ the youtube video goes here.
 
Consider the numbers. So far nearly twenty times as many dead Palestinians than Israel's & growing since the Palestinians began the conflict firing rocket missiles at Israel. And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict. It's called Palestinian Mentality.

Ten people, including two children, have been killed in rocket attacks on Israel since the fighting began last Monday, Israel said. The overall death toll in Gaza now stands at 197 people, including 58 children and 34 women, with 1,230 injured, according to the Hamas-controlled health ministry.1 day ago
And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict.
Israel's military has been pounding Palestinian civilians for over seven decades and has not won yet.
Do you not believe Israel is capable of a far greater massacre of Palestinians? Let the Pali's keep it up long enough & you will live & learn.
Israel is shooting itself in the foot. The more Palestinians it kills, the less support it gets worldwide.
May I suggest you go back to the OP & answer the question -- what would you do?
If Israel would stop making enemies, it would not have to "defend itself."
Why do you avoid the question --- what would you do? On the OP?
4. All armed action or repressive measures of all kinds directed against dependent peoples shall cease in order to enable them to exercise peacefully and freely their right to complete independence, and the integrity of their national territory shall be respected.
5. Immediate steps shall be taken, in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories or all other territories which have not yet attained independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race, creed or colour, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and freedom.

 
Consider the numbers. So far nearly twenty times as many dead Palestinians than Israel's & growing since the Palestinians began the conflict firing rocket missiles at Israel. And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict. It's called Palestinian Mentality.

Ten people, including two children, have been killed in rocket attacks on Israel since the fighting began last Monday, Israel said. The overall death toll in Gaza now stands at 197 people, including 58 children and 34 women, with 1,230 injured, according to the Hamas-controlled health ministry.1 day ago
And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict.
Israel's military has been pounding Palestinian civilians for over seven decades and has not won yet.
Do you not believe Israel is capable of a far greater massacre of Palestinians? Let the Pali's keep it up long enough & you will live & learn.
Israel is shooting itself in the foot. The more Palestinians it kills, the less support it gets worldwide.
May I suggest you go back to the OP & answer the question -- what would you do?
If Israel would stop making enemies, it would not have to "defend itself."
Why do you avoid the question --- what would you do? On the OP?
4. All armed action or repressive measures of all kinds directed against dependent peoples shall cease in order to enable them to exercise peacefully and freely their right to complete independence, and the integrity of their national territory shall be respected.
5. Immediate steps shall be taken, in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories or all other territories which have not yet attained independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race, creed or colour, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and freedom.

I didn't read the part about islamic terrorists firing rockets at a sovereign nation.

Rockets leaving the "country of Pal'istan" (you know, the ''country of Pal'istan'' invented by the Treaty of Lausanne), is an act of war. Therefore, none of your cutting and pasting is relevant.

Thanks.
 
Let us all join together in hopes the Palestinians will not push Israel to do what Jordan had to do to establish a lasting peace from the Palestinians.
 
Consider the numbers. So far nearly twenty times as many dead Palestinians than Israel's & growing since the Palestinians began the conflict firing rocket missiles at Israel. And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict. It's called Palestinian Mentality.

Ten people, including two children, have been killed in rocket attacks on Israel since the fighting began last Monday, Israel said. The overall death toll in Gaza now stands at 197 people, including 58 children and 34 women, with 1,230 injured, according to the Hamas-controlled health ministry.1 day ago
And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict.
Israel's military has been pounding Palestinian civilians for over seven decades and has not won yet.
Israel has a thriving country. They already won. The Palestinians (thanks to their “leadership”) have done nothing but lose lose lose and fail.
BTW, how would you prefer Israel react to rockets being launched at it ?
 
What would you do? Is it better to kill those who are trying to kill you, be condemned by the world & live, or not kill those who are trying to kill you, be respected by the the world & be dead?

For Israel I see but one option. Fact: When all else has failed to establish peace, war can be the solution. Without war the USA would be ruled by the British. Without war the USA & Japan would not now be allies. Without war, Hitler would have had world domination. And without war, Jordan would not now be at peace from Palestinians.

Please understand, I hate wars, any wars. But when all else has failed to bring peace, what's left to achieve it?

Israel has more than one choice. Yes, the Arabs are hostile. But Israel makes sure they stay hostile because Israel wants to continue to take land. They cannot do this without any pretext.
 
Consider the numbers. So far nearly twenty times as many dead Palestinians than Israel's & growing since the Palestinians began the conflict firing rocket missiles at Israel. And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict. It's called Palestinian Mentality.

Ten people, including two children, have been killed in rocket attacks on Israel since the fighting began last Monday, Israel said. The overall death toll in Gaza now stands at 197 people, including 58 children and 34 women, with 1,230 injured, according to the Hamas-controlled health ministry.1 day ago
And yet no surrender from the Palestinians to end the conflict.
Israel's military has been pounding Palestinian civilians for over seven decades and has not won yet.
Do you not believe Israel is capable of a far greater massacre of Palestinians? Let the Pali's keep it up long enough & you will live & learn.
Israel is shooting itself in the foot. The more Palestinians it kills, the less support it gets worldwide.
May I suggest you go back to the OP & answer the question -- what would you do?
If Israel would stop making enemies, it would not have to "defend itself."
Israel recently signed accords to normalize relations with Arab nations in the region. It was on the news. You missed it?
So?
My goodness , do you need EVERYTHING explained to you ????
Israel is doing the opposite of making enemies, like you claim. They are making allies ...
 
What would you do? Is it better to kill those who are trying to kill you, be condemned by the world & live, or not kill those who are trying to kill you, be respected by the the world & be dead?

For Israel I see but one option. Fact: When all else has failed to establish peace, war can be the solution. Without war the USA would be ruled by the British. Without war the USA & Japan would not now be allies. Without war, Hitler would have had world domination. And without war, Jordan would not now be at peace from Palestinians.

Please understand, I hate wars, any wars. But when all else has failed to bring peace, what's left to achieve it?
Many on the left would be happy if Israel did not exist.
 
RE Question
SUBTOPIC: Violation of the Geneva Convention
※→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

PREFACE: "Since the birth of the United Nations, more than 80 former colonies comprising some 750 million people have gained independence. At present, 17 Non-Self-Governing Territories (NSGTs) across the globe remain on the list of Non-Self-Governing Territories, home to nearly 2 million people. Thus, the process of decolonization is not complete."

BLUF: Now you (P F Tinmore) are being a bit dishonest. You know this is false, inaccurate, and misleading information. There is NO TERRITORY anywhere within the Middle East North Africa Region or inside the perimeter of the Arab League or the Persian Gulf, or adjacent to the Arabian Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, or the Gulf of Aden, that is

P F Tinmore said:
4. All armed action or repressive measures of all kinds directed against dependent peoples shall cease in order to enable them to exercise peacefully and freely their right to complete independence, and the integrity of their national territory shall be respected.
5. Immediate steps shall be taken, in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories or all other territories which have not yet attained independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race, creed or colour, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and freedom.

(COMMENT)


You know damn well that C-24 does not consider the disputed territories west of the Jordan River to be "NSGTs." And anyone who bothers to FACT CHECK the implication you make here in your Posting #26, will see just how you try and manipulate the truth. And this technique is not unique to the anti-Israeli Community or among the Free Palestine Activists.

Special Committee on Decolonization said:
In 1963, the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (also known as the "Special Committee on Decolonization" or the "C-24") approved a preliminary list of Territories to which the Declaration applied (A/5446/Rev.1, annex I). Today, 17 Non-Self-Governing Territories, as listed below, remain on the agenda of the C-24. Member States which have or assume responsibilities for the administration of such Territories are called administering Powers.

◈ Under Chapter XI (Article 73) of the Charter of the United Nations, the Non-Self-Governing Territories are defined as "territories whose people have not yet attained a full measure of self-government.”

The Arab Palestinian people have actually exercised or declined to build and exercise (depending on who you look at it) self-governing institutions several times since the implementation of the Mandate for Palestine or the Recommendations made by Resolution A/RES/181 (II). This whole Nakba nonsense is just a manifestation of the Arab Palestinian rejection of the opportunity to create another Arab State. And in doing so, the outcome was the entirety of the disputed territories west of the Jordan River were militarily occupied by one or the other Arab League nations. And the whiny Arab Palestinians are trying to blame the Israelis for the results of this blunder ever since.

1611604183365.png


Most Respectfully,
R

.
 
RE Question
SUBTOPIC: Violation of the Geneva Convention
※→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

PREFACE: "Since the birth of the United Nations, more than 80 former colonies comprising some 750 million people have gained independence. At present, 17 Non-Self-Governing Territories (NSGTs) across the globe remain on the list of Non-Self-Governing Territories, home to nearly 2 million people. Thus, the process of decolonization is not complete."

BLUF: Now you (P F Tinmore) are being a bit dishonest. You know this is false, inaccurate, and misleading information. There is NO TERRITORY anywhere within the Middle East North Africa Region or inside the perimeter of the Arab League or the Persian Gulf, or adjacent to the Arabian Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, or the Gulf of Aden, that is


P F Tinmore said:
4. All armed action or repressive measures of all kinds directed against dependent peoples shall cease in order to enable them to exercise peacefully and freely their right to complete independence, and the integrity of their national territory shall be respected.
5. Immediate steps shall be taken, in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories or all other territories which have not yet attained independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race, creed or colour, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and freedom.

(COMMENT)

You know damn well that C-24 does not consider the disputed territories west of the Jordan River to be "NSGTs." And anyone who bothers to FACT CHECK the implication you make here in your Posting #26, will see just how you try and manipulate the truth. And this technique is not unique to the anti-Israeli Community or among the Free Palestine Activists.

Special Committee on Decolonization said:
In 1963, the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (also known as the "Special Committee on Decolonization" or the "C-24") approved a preliminary list of Territories to which the Declaration applied (A/5446/Rev.1, annex I). Today, 17 Non-Self-Governing Territories, as listed below, remain on the agenda of the C-24. Member States which have or assume responsibilities for the administration of such Territories are called administering Powers.

◈ Under Chapter XI (Article 73) of the Charter of the United Nations, the Non-Self-Governing Territories are defined as "territories whose people have not yet attained a full measure of self-government.”

The Arab Palestinian people have actually exercised or declined to build and exercise (depending on who you look at it) self-governing institutions several times since the implementation of the Mandate for Palestine or the Recommendations made by Resolution A/RES/181 (II). This whole Nakba nonsense is just a manifestation of the Arab Palestinian rejection of the opportunity to create another Arab State. And in doing so, the outcome was the entirety of the disputed territories west of the Jordan River were militarily occupied by one or the other Arab League nations. And the whiny Arab Palestinians are trying to blame the Israelis for the results of this blunder ever since.

1611604183365.png


Most Respectfully,
R

.
So very true. It's called Palestinian Mentality.
 
RE Question
SUBTOPIC: Violation of the Geneva Convention
※→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

PREFACE: "Since the birth of the United Nations, more than 80 former colonies comprising some 750 million people have gained independence. At present, 17 Non-Self-Governing Territories (NSGTs) across the globe remain on the list of Non-Self-Governing Territories, home to nearly 2 million people. Thus, the process of decolonization is not complete."

BLUF: Now you (P F Tinmore) are being a bit dishonest. You know this is false, inaccurate, and misleading information. There is NO TERRITORY anywhere within the Middle East North Africa Region or inside the perimeter of the Arab League or the Persian Gulf, or adjacent to the Arabian Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, or the Gulf of Aden, that is


P F Tinmore said:
4. All armed action or repressive measures of all kinds directed against dependent peoples shall cease in order to enable them to exercise peacefully and freely their right to complete independence, and the integrity of their national territory shall be respected.
5. Immediate steps shall be taken, in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories or all other territories which have not yet attained independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race, creed or colour, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and freedom.

(COMMENT)

You know damn well that C-24 does not consider the disputed territories west of the Jordan River to be "NSGTs." And anyone who bothers to FACT CHECK the implication you make here in your Posting #26, will see just how you try and manipulate the truth. And this technique is not unique to the anti-Israeli Community or among the Free Palestine Activists.

Special Committee on Decolonization said:
In 1963, the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (also known as the "Special Committee on Decolonization" or the "C-24") approved a preliminary list of Territories to which the Declaration applied (A/5446/Rev.1, annex I). Today, 17 Non-Self-Governing Territories, as listed below, remain on the agenda of the C-24. Member States which have or assume responsibilities for the administration of such Territories are called administering Powers.

◈ Under Chapter XI (Article 73) of the Charter of the United Nations, the Non-Self-Governing Territories are defined as "territories whose people have not yet attained a full measure of self-government.”

The Arab Palestinian people have actually exercised or declined to build and exercise (depending on who you look at it) self-governing institutions several times since the implementation of the Mandate for Palestine or the Recommendations made by Resolution A/RES/181 (II). This whole Nakba nonsense is just a manifestation of the Arab Palestinian rejection of the opportunity to create another Arab State. And in doing so, the outcome was the entirety of the disputed territories west of the Jordan River were militarily occupied by one or the other Arab League nations. And the whiny Arab Palestinians are trying to blame the Israelis for the results of this blunder ever since.

1611604183365.png


Most Respectfully,
R

.
You can say that about anybody else but you can't say it about Israel.

Israel's Zionist Settler-Colonial Project in Palestine Explained | I Got A Story to Tell | S2E8​


 
RE Question
SUBTOPIC: Violation of the Geneva Convention
※→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

PREFACE: "Since the birth of the United Nations, more than 80 former colonies comprising some 750 million people have gained independence. At present, 17 Non-Self-Governing Territories (NSGTs) across the globe remain on the list of Non-Self-Governing Territories, home to nearly 2 million people. Thus, the process of decolonization is not complete."

BLUF: Now you (P F Tinmore) are being a bit dishonest. You know this is false, inaccurate, and misleading information. There is NO TERRITORY anywhere within the Middle East North Africa Region or inside the perimeter of the Arab League or the Persian Gulf, or adjacent to the Arabian Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, or the Gulf of Aden, that is


P F Tinmore said:
4. All armed action or repressive measures of all kinds directed against dependent peoples shall cease in order to enable them to exercise peacefully and freely their right to complete independence, and the integrity of their national territory shall be respected.
5. Immediate steps shall be taken, in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories or all other territories which have not yet attained independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race, creed or colour, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and freedom.

(COMMENT)

You know damn well that C-24 does not consider the disputed territories west of the Jordan River to be "NSGTs." And anyone who bothers to FACT CHECK the implication you make here in your Posting #26, will see just how you try and manipulate the truth. And this technique is not unique to the anti-Israeli Community or among the Free Palestine Activists.

Special Committee on Decolonization said:
In 1963, the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (also known as the "Special Committee on Decolonization" or the "C-24") approved a preliminary list of Territories to which the Declaration applied (A/5446/Rev.1, annex I). Today, 17 Non-Self-Governing Territories, as listed below, remain on the agenda of the C-24. Member States which have or assume responsibilities for the administration of such Territories are called administering Powers.

◈ Under Chapter XI (Article 73) of the Charter of the United Nations, the Non-Self-Governing Territories are defined as "territories whose people have not yet attained a full measure of self-government.”

The Arab Palestinian people have actually exercised or declined to build and exercise (depending on who you look at it) self-governing institutions several times since the implementation of the Mandate for Palestine or the Recommendations made by Resolution A/RES/181 (II). This whole Nakba nonsense is just a manifestation of the Arab Palestinian rejection of the opportunity to create another Arab State. And in doing so, the outcome was the entirety of the disputed territories west of the Jordan River were militarily occupied by one or the other Arab League nations. And the whiny Arab Palestinians are trying to blame the Israelis for the results of this blunder ever since.

1611604183365.png


Most Respectfully,
R

.
You can say that about anybody else but you can't say it about Israel.

Israel's Zionist Settler-Colonial Project in Palestine Explained | I Got A Story to Tell | S2E8​

If you dun' seen it on the YouTube, it must be real.
 
What would you do? Is it better to kill those who are trying to kill you, be condemned by the world & live, or not kill those who are trying to kill you, be respected by the the world & be dead?

For Israel I see but one option. Fact: When all else has failed to establish peace, war can be the solution. Without war the USA would be ruled by the British. Without war the USA & Japan would not now be allies. Without war, Hitler would have had world domination. And without war, Jordan would not now be at peace from Palestinians.

Please understand, I hate wars, any wars. But when all else has failed to bring peace, what's left to achieve it?

Too many Jews have been eager to the world's love and empathy. they rathered having their people genocided, as long as they get their love.

Allowing the enemy to kill you, without defending your people, is no pride. it's the worst shame you can have.

I rather see Million enemies killed than 1 Jewish kid murdered in my country. I am very proud of that. The west has been promoting this idea that all people should apologize and feel shame. shame for what? for DEFENDING OUR PEOPLE.

So, shame on you, BBC, CNN, ABC.
 
What would you do? Is it better to kill those who are trying to kill you, be condemned by the world & live, or not kill those who are trying to kill you, be respected by the the world & be dead?

For Israel I see but one option. Fact: When all else has failed to establish peace, war can be the solution. Without war the USA would be ruled by the British. Without war the USA & Japan would not now be allies. Without war, Hitler would have had world domination. And without war, Jordan would not now be at peace from Palestinians.

Please understand, I hate wars, any wars. But when all else has failed to bring peace, what's left to achieve it?

Too many Jews have been eager to the world's love and empathy. they rathered having their people genocided, as long as they get their love.

Allowing the enemy to kill you, without defending your people, is no pride. it's the worst shame you can have.

I rather see Million enemies killed than 1 Jewish kid murdered in my country. I am very proud of that. The west has been promoting this idea that all people should apologize and feel shame. shame for what? for DEFENDING OUR PEOPLE.

So, shame on you, BBC, CNN, ABC.
I certainly agree. What gets to me is how Israel fights back with restraint when Israel has the capability to also send masses of ground troops & wipe out enough Pali terrorists to put a fast end to the conflict.
 
What would you do? Is it better to kill those who are trying to kill you, be condemned by the world & live, or not kill those who are trying to kill you, be respected by the the world & be dead?

For Israel I see but one option. Fact: When all else has failed to establish peace, war can be the solution. Without war the USA would be ruled by the British. Without war the USA & Japan would not now be allies. Without war, Hitler would have had world domination. And without war, Jordan would not now be at peace from Palestinians.

Please understand, I hate wars, any wars. But when all else has failed to bring peace, what's left to achieve it?

Too many Jews have been eager to the world's love and empathy. they rathered having their people genocided, as long as they get their love.

Allowing the enemy to kill you, without defending your people, is no pride. it's the worst shame you can have.

I rather see Million enemies killed than 1 Jewish kid murdered in my country. I am very proud of that. The west has been promoting this idea that all people should apologize and feel shame. shame for what? for DEFENDING OUR PEOPLE.

So, shame on you, BBC, CNN, ABC.
I certainly agree. What gets to me is how Israel fights back with restraint when Israel has the capability to also send masses of ground troops & wipe out enough Pali terrorists to put a fast end to the conflict.

If we wanted? we could have destroyed the entire Gaza strip along with its 1.8M people in less than 2 days.

Not only do we not do that, WE literally Send Hamas and the Gazans warnings before we destroy civil towers, so we don't kill civilians. I believe we should absolutley stop this warnings.

Also, literally in 2004 Israel did not kill the heads of Hamas because it would have killed dozens of civilians. But all those European antisemitic pieces of garbage of the EU are going to denounce us. Hipocrisy at its best
 

Forum List

Back
Top