Question for my conservative friends here.

[Father O'Blivion]

If Trump is found guilty in the documents case with Cannon presiding, will you agree the government proved its case and Trump deserves the punishment meted out?

Before the obvious question is asked, yes I will believe the government did not prove its case if he is acquitted with Cannon presiding..

 

[Mac1958]

If Trump is found guilty in the documents case with Cannon presiding, will you agree the government proved its case and Trump deserves the punishment meted out?

Before the obvious question is asked, yes I will believe the government did not prove its case if he is acquitted with Cannon presiding..

No. They'll say she went commie. I'm not kidding.

There is ALWAYS an excuse.

 

[ReinyDays]

Depends on Judge Cannon's ruling ... if there's prosecutorial misconduct ... then Trump should be acquitted, regardless of his actions ...

I think the Bundys need to spend time in prison ... but not if the prosecuters are making up evidence ... or lying to the court ...

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Doubtful

 

[Michelle420]

If Trump is found guilty in the documents case with Cannon presiding, will you agree the government proved its case and Trump deserves the punishment meted out?

Before the obvious question is asked, yes I will believe the government did not prove its case if he is acquitted with Cannon presiding..

No.

 

[Father O'Blivion]

Doubtful

Doubtful you will agree with outcome of the case, or doubtful he will be found not guilty?

 

[Godboy]

If Trump is found guilty in the documents case with Cannon presiding, will you agree the government proved its case and Trump deserves the punishment meted out?

Before the obvious question is asked, yes I will believe the government did not prove its case if he is acquitted with Cannon presiding..

Trump seems to be guilty of a crime that multiple other people have been guilty of, except they werent punished for it. Why would you expect us to watch our politicians go to jail for crimes that your politicians dont go to jail for? In what world does that sound reasonable? We would have to be fucking idiots to just roll over and accept it. If you havent noticed, it enraged MILLIONS of Americans.

 

[mak2]

There will be whataboutism BIGLY.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Doubtful you will agree with outcome of the case, or doubtful he will be found not guilty?

Both. To believe it is a just decision one must first believe the claims are legitimate

 

[Father O'Blivion]

No.

Would you believe a not guilty verdict?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

There will be whataboutism BIGLY.

Yeah! What about EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW is just a ridiculous expectation!

 

[Father O'Blivion]

Both. To believe it is a just decision one must first believe the claims are legitimate

Isn't that what the trial is for? The government must prove it's case?

 

[MarathonMike]

When Joe Biden is indicted and tried for accepting 10 Million dollars in bribery money from a Ukrainian Oligarch, then yes I would accept any ruling in Trump's documents case.

 

[Godboy]

There will be whataboutism BIGLY.

Those who complain about "whataboutisms" are always guilty of what they are being accused of. Using the word "whataboutism" isnt going to help you in a debate. Find a real argument.

 

[mak2]

Those who complain about "whataboutisms" are always guilty of what they are being accused of. Using the word "whataboutism" isnt going to help you in a debate.

See your post #7.

 

[Father O'Blivion]

Trump seems to be guilty of a crime that multiple other people have been guilty of, except they werent punished for it. Why would you expect us to watch our politicians go to jail for crimes that your politicians dont go to jail for? In what world does that sound reasonable? We would have to be fucking idiots to just roll over and accept it. If you havent noticed, it enraged MILLIONS of Americans.

I'm not sure what you mean by rolling over.

It would be proven in court of law presided over by a Trump appointed judge, with a jury from Florida.

 

[Godboy]

Isn't that what the trial is for? The government must prove it's case?

We dont try people who take documents. That precedent was set by Hillary Clinton very recently even. Why is Trump suddenly being charged for it?

 

[22lcidw]

There are people smarter than others in human history and realize the ruses pushed against them. Their weaknesses are used against them though when the elites want control. The ones not so smart although they may be "educated" are tools of these architects of fear that use that to become even more powerful. It is incredible we have all of this modern technology, and it is used against people promoting common sense. Degenerate power brokers using Jesus Christ to force people to eat insects instead of meat and vegetables is just one warning of insanity and population control with many others living impoverished. Worse than we live now y several times over.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Isn't that what the trial is for? The government must prove it's case?

No

The trial is to jam up a potential presidential run and to get even for his attempted dismantling of the status quo. It is also a warning for any future presidents who think about bucking the system.

 

[Godboy]

See your post #7.

Is it untrue? If not, you can kick rocks with your weak ass "whataboutism" nonsense. That is an argument for scrub debaters.