That might be the only honest thing you have written in this forum.It's entirely possible that Russia's and China's nukes are outdated duds.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That might be the only honest thing you have written in this forum.It's entirely possible that Russia's and China's nukes are outdated duds.
And then demand 50% of the countries rate earth minerals in perpetuity.Isn’t it great that America tricked Russia into invading Ukraine to get bogged down in for 3 years fighting a war they have no chance of winning which costs them 1 billion dollars every day?
So no deal?And then demand 50% of the countries rate earth minerals in perpetuity.
Right
On Iran's behaviour, of course.On what?
How so?On Iran's behaviour, of course.
Kievan regime is everything, but democracy (in any meaningful sense).Russia invaded because democracy in Ukraine is a threat to them.
If Iran is smart - Russia will protect them. If they are not that smart - Russia won't protect them.How so?
That seems pretty vague. Maybe give an example of Iranian behavior the would lead to Russia protecting Iran. And an example of Iranian behavior that would lead to Russia not protecting Iran. Is that fair to ask?If Iran is smart - Russia will protect them. If they are not that smart - Russia won't protect them.
Its definitely not my area of expertise, but as much as I can guess, Iranian "good" behaviour would be support of Russian efforts in peacekeeping in South Caucasus and Middle East, coordination of gas and oil markets, non-nuking Israel. Iran's "bad" behaviour - Iran nuking Israel without direct Russian order, undermine of Russian efforts in Middle East or selling too much of gas and oil without Russia's permission.That seems pretty vague. Maybe give an example of Iranian behavior the would lead to Russia protecting Iran. And an example of Iranian behavior that would lead to Russia not protecting Iran. Is that fair to ask?
Nor should he. He’s in a position of strength, Zelenskyy doesn’t even have Kursk as a card to lay down anymore.Putin is unwilling to concede territory
Unwilling to accept European Peacekeepers
Unwilling to accept current boundaries
In a word NOTHING
Yet Trump bullies Zelensky for having some expectation of retaining territory and having assurance of peace.
Why isn’t Trump getting tough with Putin?
![]()
Putin rules out concessions as Trump seeks quick Ukraine truce
President Donald Trump said during his congressional address that he had received strong signals that Russia was ready for peace.www.newsweek.com
He is in a position of strength because Trump took away all of Zelenskys strengthPutin declares ……No concessions on Ukraine
Nor should he. He’s in a position of strength, Zelenskyy doesn’t even have Kursk as a card to lay down anymore.
He wouldn’t be right now had Kamala Harris won the election or if Republican Senators were able to find their balls to stand up to Putin’s jackal Don Trump.He’s in a position of strength
Zelenskiy's strength? Really? American taxpayers strength, actually. And every dollar invested in Ukrainian thugs, wasn't invested in American veterans and US Forces.He is in a position of strength because Trump took away all of Zelenskys strength
And what then? In the year or two Ukraine will run out of manpower.He wouldn’t be right now had Kamala Harris won the election or if Republican Senators were able to find their balls to stand up to Putin’s jackal Don Trump.
The Ukrainians have 4 to 6 months enough, ammunition to hold Russia off. Republican Senators I believe in the long run will not allow Trump to cut off military aid if Trump can’t get Zelensky to surrender Ukrainian sovereignty in the United States and Russia
You're prematurely suggesting that a war against Russia is a bad investment. America could pull a 'tie' out of this war still.Zelenskiy's strength? Really? American taxpayers strength, actually. And every dollar invested in Ukrainian thugs, wasn't invested in American veterans and US Forces.
Actually yes…Zelenskiy's strength? Really? American taxpayers strength, actually. And every dollar invested in Ukrainian thugs, wasn't invested in American veterans and US Forces.
It definitely is. It decreases your own military capabilities and it increases Russian motivation to eliminate you.You're prematurely suggesting that a war against Russia is a bad investment.
And fentanyl addicts wouldn't make all those shots if it wasn't good for their health. Would they? Local wars may give you some injections of resources and/or psychological satisfaction, but rather sooner than later they lead you in the degradation, demise and death.America could pull a 'tie' out of this war still.
You're not understanding that even the Afghanistan loss wass still a good investment. America wouldn't be starting dozens of wars of aggression if there was no gain to be had!
America can't allow any contenders to rise to superior superpower status. We should be able to agree that is the reason why America started the proxy war against Russia.It definitely is. It decreases your own military capabilities and it increases Russian motivation to eliminate you.
Was Britain's wars of aggression throughout the world, not for their gain?And fentanyl addicts wouldn't make all those shots if it wasn't good for their health. Would they? Local wars may give you some injections of resources and/or psychological satisfaction, but rather sooner than later they lead you in the degradation, demise and death.
It definitely is. It decreases your own military capabilities and it increases Russian motivation to eliminate you.
they won’t need manpower if the goddamn Republican Party would get out of the way of a NATO coordinated massive offensive and defensive weapon build up that Putin could never in a million years keep up with. Lets grt on a war footing build up of high-tech drones that can reach fucking Moscow.And what then? In the year or two Ukraine will run out of manpower.