HaShev
Platinum Member
- Jun 19, 2009
- 19,200
- 8,609
- 925
You are going about this election fraud fight the long and wrong way, why not use their own obstructive tactic against them.
It helps if you notice how and what tools they are using in their
"organized election fraud network"
They made sure they had Dem elected State AG's who control the election processes, and in doing so they hire and oversee the strategy of cheating.
Do an Ai search to see how you can legally use a federal injunction ( their obstructive method) to stop what you are waiting senators to stop.
Q: can federal judges stop state attorney generals from allowing non citizens from voting in federal elections
Short answer: Yes, federal judges can block actions by state officials—including state attorneys general—if those actions conflict with federal law or the U.S. Constitution.
But the exact situation matters a lot.
1. Federal law on non-citizen voting
Under U.S. law, non-citizens are prohibited from voting in federal elections (President, U.S. Senate, U.S. House). This comes from the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, which makes it unlawful for non-citizens to vote in federal elections.
States administer elections, but they must still follow federal law.
2. When a federal judge could intervene
A federal court judge could issue an order (like an injunction) stopping a state official if:
*A state policy allows non-citizens to vote in federal elections, or
*The state fails to enforce federal eligibility requirements, or
Someone (e.g., the federal government, voters, or organizations) files a lawsuit claiming the policy violates federal law.
In that case, the dispute could be heard in a federal court under the authority of the U.S. Constitution and federal election statutes.
Arrest a few of these State AG that have knowingly and willingly violated federal law and they will flip and talk and give up the orchestrators of the great cheat, the kind of conspiring that falls under the rico act.
It helps if you notice how and what tools they are using in their
"organized election fraud network"
They made sure they had Dem elected State AG's who control the election processes, and in doing so they hire and oversee the strategy of cheating.
Do an Ai search to see how you can legally use a federal injunction ( their obstructive method) to stop what you are waiting senators to stop.
Q: can federal judges stop state attorney generals from allowing non citizens from voting in federal elections
Short answer: Yes, federal judges can block actions by state officials—including state attorneys general—if those actions conflict with federal law or the U.S. Constitution.
But the exact situation matters a lot.1. Federal law on non-citizen voting
Under U.S. law, non-citizens are prohibited from voting in federal elections (President, U.S. Senate, U.S. House). This comes from the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, which makes it unlawful for non-citizens to vote in federal elections.
States administer elections, but they must still follow federal law.
2. When a federal judge could intervene
A federal court judge could issue an order (like an injunction) stopping a state official if:
*A state policy allows non-citizens to vote in federal elections, or
*The state fails to enforce federal eligibility requirements, or
Someone (e.g., the federal government, voters, or organizations) files a lawsuit claiming the policy violates federal law.
In that case, the dispute could be heard in a federal court under the authority of the U.S. Constitution and federal election statutes.
Arrest a few of these State AG that have knowingly and willingly violated federal law and they will flip and talk and give up the orchestrators of the great cheat, the kind of conspiring that falls under the rico act.
