Public Share and Exposing of those who are Celebrating the Murder of Charlie Kirk

Jesus called a woman out for being a whore.
The only biblical interactions between Jesus and prostitutes we have demonstrate his message of grace, forgiveness, and inclusion for social outcasts and marginalized subgroups of people.
Just the the opposite of Charlie Kirk's message.
He called the religious leaders "whitewashed tombs" and vipers.
He would say the same thing about religious leaders (and their followers) today.
In fact the best way to make the New Testament come alive is to substitute the word "Christian" everytime you see the word "Jew" realizing that the Jews were the predominant monotheistic religion of the day. Jews were the "Christians" of Jesus' day.

'For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:

But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God."

---Romans 2:28-29
He told a woman reaching out to Him that He doesn't give what is meant for His people to DOGS.
Yes, and then, after testing her faith he heals the Canaanite woman's daughter illustrating that God's grace and mercy extends to everyone regardless of background.
Jesus' entire ministry was geared toward the message of inclusion. There were no "favorites" in God's kingdom (according to Jesus). This of course drove the most pious Jews of rhe day insane because of course they wanted to believe that THEY were God's favorite.
It is the same with phony Christians like Charlie Kirk today.
You think Jesus was just nice. He was not just nice. He told the truth in love.
True, and the most pious, self-important religious people of the day murdered him for that truth.
Christians would do the same thing today because his message to them would be very similiar to what pissed the Jews off back then...
basically "those of you who think yourselves first in the eyes of God...yeah...you're going to be last, and all those OTHER people...the ones you hate without formally using the word...the ones you slander and insult and oppress and victimize...God prefers THEIR company over yours.
So love EVERYBODY...equally...without judgement.
For the last shall be first."
 
Why don't you enlighten me then and give me your take on the New Testament temple episode.
What do YOU think it was about?
That isn't the point. But a lefty like you can't seem to get that.

The point was you said Kirk sowed intolerance. Not that you have a quote to put that in context. Heaven forbid you actually make an "argument" instead of just stating something like it was fact......but I digress.

Jesus also practiced intolerance at some level. So accusing Kirk of intolerance isn't necessarily going to sway my thinking.

Does that help.
 
It looks like the lefts groyper was living with a tranny and I guarantee you there's antifa and Democratic socialists of America s*** all over their little love nest

They were lovers .....he was a ***
The pantifa is cooperating with the fbi

Violent fags
Charlie Kirk's killer was a violent democratic socialist homosexual

:auiqs.jpg:
 
Per Fox News reporter Brooke Singman: Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson lived with his transgender partner, sources tell me.


The individual, who is a male transitioning to a female, is fully cooperating with the FBI.

Sources tell me the FBI had texts and other communications between Robinson and the individual that helped FBI authorities solidify that Robinson was indeed the shooter.
 
Kirk's message was that the conversation needed to continue. When it stopped you went to violence. Was he wrong?
How disingenous of you to try to claim this was Kirk's message when you know that's not true.
Kirk's message was a continual dog whistle to all the wingnut, fringe-lunatic white supremacists and homophobes out there that what they believe has some validiry and can be credibly debated in academic environments.
He was a hatemonger and he spread a message of hatred.
You speak for God?
I have evolved WAY beyond my early Christian background and my study of the Bible in preparation for the ministry.
I have given up on it..HOWEVER...I do believe that if anyone is going to **** around with this pretend religiin then freaking DIVE IN!
Don't just peck around the edges pretending to embrace it. Study the life and teachings of Christ and LIVE IT!

So yeah, I can speak for God because I have studied Gid.
 
At last tally over 4,500 have been fired. Addled loons felt they were effective in joking about “just missed” on Trump but it’s a different tune still in America about celebrating and encouraging murder
 
How disingenous of you to try to claim this was Kirk's message when you know that's not true.
He's only been quoted 100 times on film saying it.

And he showed up on campuses to debate the other side.

Do you ever stop lying?

Kirk's message was a continual dog whistle to all the wingnut, fringe-lunatic white supremacists and homophobes out there that what they believe has some validiry and can be credibly debated in academic environments.
He was a hatemonger and he spread a message of hatred.

Your assessment is a grand opinion with no validation (on your part). Kirk wasn't going to spread a message of go along to get along. But he was interested in figuring out to co-exist.

But he was out there talking to others.

You are here lecturing others claiming opinion as fact.

STHU

I have evolved WAY beyond my early Christian background and my study of the Bible in preparation for the ministry.
Devolved.

I have given up on it..HOWEVER...I do believe that if anyone is going to **** around with this pretend religiin then freaking DIVE IN!
Can you please speak English. I really don't even care what pretent religion you think you can call pretend. Not interested. You are a fool.

Don't just peck around the edges pretending to embrace it. Study the life and teachings of Christ and LIVE IT!
Who the hell do you think you are? Maybe you should exemplify what you preach instead of coming across like a pharisee
So yeah, I can speak for God because I have studied Gid.
That gives you no authority whatsoever.

Is ignorance a requirement for your "religion"?
.
 
Per Fox News reporter Brooke Singman: Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson lived with his transgender partner, sources tell me.


The individual, who is a male transitioning to a female, is fully cooperating with the FBI.

Sources tell me the FBI had texts and other communications between Robinson and the individual that helped FBI authorities solidify that Robinson was indeed the shooter.
Mental and emotional illness of trying to manipulate your body and soul is Contagious
 
He's only been quoted 100 times on film saying it.

And he showed up on campuses to debate the other side.

Do you ever stop lying?



Your assessment is a grand opinion with no validation (on your part). Kirk wasn't going to spread a message of go along to get along. But he was interested in figuring out to co-exist.

But he was out there talking to others.

You are here lecturing others claiming opinion as fact.

STHU


Devolved.


Can you please speak English. I really don't even care what pretent religion you think you can call pretend. Not interested. You are a fool.


Who the hell do you think you are? Maybe you should exemplify what you preach instead of coming across like a pharisee

That gives you no authority whatsoever.

Is ignorance a requirement for your "religion"?
.
You sound triggered.
 
15th post
That isn't the point. But a lefty like you can't seem to get that.

The point was you said Kirk sowed intolerance. Not that you have a quote to put that in context. Heaven forbid you actually make an "argument" instead of just stating something like it was fact......but I digress.
The Southern Poverty Law Center documented how TPUSA repeatedly framed immigrants, LGBTQ+ people, and racial justice advocates as existential threats to “white Christian America,” warning followers that their families, religion, and entire way of life were under attack. In later years, Kirk openly embraced Christian nationalist language, claiming that liberty was only possible with a Christian population—a narrative tying freedom to demographic dominance, a cornerstone of supremacist logic (SPLC).

On race, Kirk was blunt and dismissive. He denied the existence of systemic racism, called white privilege a “racist idea,” and vilified critical race theory as dangerous indoctrination. In one speech, he called George Floyd a “scumbag,” showing open contempt for a man whose death triggered a national reckoning on race and policing (WHYY). These rhetorical choices were not accidental—they functioned as a political strategy to delegitimize Black pain and deny the realities of structural racism in America.

Inside TPUSA, the culture reflected the same hostility. A New Yorker investigation described the workplace as “difficult … and rife with tension, some of it racial.” One African American staffer reported being the only person of color when hired in 2014, only to be fired on Martin Luther King Jr. Day. The organization’s then–national field director, Crystal Clanton, was exposed for texting, “I hate black people. … End of story.” TPUSA claimed it acted after the texts surfaced, but the damage was undeniable—the rot reached the top (New Yorker).

Kirk’s movement also courted or tolerated figures openly tied to the far right. Political Research Associates documented cases where TPUSA chapters hosted or aligned with Nick Fuentes and his white nationalist followers. Kirk’s allies relied on antisemitic tropes, praising authoritarianism in Israel while denouncing “liberal Jews” in the United States (PRA). TPUSA severed ties when public exposure threatened its reputation, but the repeated associations revealed how far Kirk was willing to go in pursuit of influence.


Jesus also practiced intolerance at some level.
Got any examples?
I am no stranger to the weird mental gymnastics and false witness people will resort to trying to rewrite the message of Christ to fit their own secular agendas.
So accusing Kirk of intolerance isn't necessarily going to sway my thinking.

Does that help.
Help what?
 
This idea is inspired by RetiredGySgt 's thread " The left proclaiming murder is ok. "

Please use this thread to link to share screenshots of any comments, posts, videos, memes, etc. that you find are celebrating the Murder of Charlie Kirk, blaming him for his own murder, etc.

Let's shine some light on those who are doing this.



View attachment 1161434

Are any of the posts cited by you being made by anyone of consequence???? Leadership of either party???

Without context, your thread is pointless.
 
The Southern Poverty Law Center documented how TPUSA repeatedly framed immigrants, LGBTQ+ people, and racial justice advocates as existential threats to “white Christian America,” warning followers that their families, religion, and entire way of life were under attack. In later years, Kirk openly embraced Christian nationalist language, claiming that liberty was only possible with a Christian population—a narrative tying freedom to demographic dominance, a cornerstone of supremacist logic (SPLC).

On race, Kirk was blunt and dismissive. He denied the existence of systemic racism, called white privilege a “racist idea,” and vilified critical race theory as dangerous indoctrination. In one speech, he called George Floyd a “scumbag,” showing open contempt for a man whose death triggered a national reckoning on race and policing (WHYY). These rhetorical choices were not accidental—they functioned as a political strategy to delegitimize Black pain and deny the realities of structural racism in America.

Inside TPUSA, the culture reflected the same hostility. A New Yorker investigation described the workplace as “difficult … and rife with tension, some of it racial.” One African American staffer reported being the only person of color when hired in 2014, only to be fired on Martin Luther King Jr. Day. The organization’s then–national field director, Crystal Clanton, was exposed for texting, “I hate black people. … End of story.” TPUSA claimed it acted after the texts surfaced, but the damage was undeniable—the rot reached the top (New Yorker).

Kirk’s movement also courted or tolerated figures openly tied to the far right. Political Research Associates documented cases where TPUSA chapters hosted or aligned with Nick Fuentes and his white nationalist followers. Kirk’s allies relied on antisemitic tropes, praising authoritarianism in Israel while denouncing “liberal Jews” in the United States (PRA). TPUSA severed ties when public exposure threatened its reputation, but the repeated associations revealed how far Kirk was willing to go in pursuit of influence.



Got any examples?
I am no stranger to the weird mental gymnastics and false witness people will resort to trying to rewrite the message of Christ to fit their own secular agendas.

Help what?
More barf about bringing it on humself
Libs can’t comprehend that speech and acts are vastly different
 
I’m getting very close to having an administrative become a mole. Had one year ago but that one had morality and resigned after a short stint
 
Back
Top Bottom