Protect the 'bump' stocks, NRA

[Skull Pilot]

WASHINGTON – The head of the National Rifle Association Sunday wouldn’t commit to a new law banning bump stocks in the wake of the Las Vegas massacre.

“There are monsters like this monster out there every day,” the CEO of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre told CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “There are menaces out there every day. People want to be able to protect themselves.”

LaPierre blamed the “elites” who “protect themselves with armed security” for trying to politicize the deadliest mass shooting in American history. Stephen Paddock sprayed bullets from his Las Vegas hotel room into a country music concert, killing 58 people and wounding 500 others.

LaPierre, who had earned $5.1 million in total compensation in 2015 as the head of the NRA, also travels with armed body guards.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/08/nra-ceo-wont-back-bill-banning-bump-stocks/

$51 million for making sure that the crazies have enough guns and ammo to kill and wound hundreds at a time. Hooray, ain't that thar NRA wonderful.

This is where I part company with the NRA. I agree that gun control would not have prevented what happened however I disagree with them bump stocks. There is no valid reason for owning such a device. I support a narrow ban on anything that makes semi-automatic weapons fire like automatic weapons.

So then you want to ban fingers and thumbs because you can bump fire any semiautomatic rifle with just your 2 hands?

Really? How about a video demonstrating that? Here is one demonstrating the 'bump' stock;

What about the statement that you do not need a bump stock to bump fire a semiauto did you not understand?

 

[Old Rocks]

58 dead, nearly 500 wounded, Vegas. 49 dead, 58 wounded, Orlando. 26 dead, including 20 young children, Sandy Hook. And weekly we hear of lesser slaughter with these types of weapons.

And still only 1% of all murders.

6 times as many people are murdered annually with knives than with rifles
more than twice as many are murdered with bare hands annually than with rifles

It's easy to be a knee jerk emotional moron though

Come at me with a knife, and there is a chance you will end up with that in your rectum. Bare hands, well most have age on me, but I have worked at very physical jobs all my life, and am still working at such. But stand off at some yardage with an assault weapon, and I don't have a chance. Not even when reloading is required.

 

[Old Rocks]

WASHINGTON – The head of the National Rifle Association Sunday wouldn’t commit to a new law banning bump stocks in the wake of the Las Vegas massacre.

“There are monsters like this monster out there every day,” the CEO of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre told CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “There are menaces out there every day. People want to be able to protect themselves.”

LaPierre blamed the “elites” who “protect themselves with armed security” for trying to politicize the deadliest mass shooting in American history. Stephen Paddock sprayed bullets from his Las Vegas hotel room into a country music concert, killing 58 people and wounding 500 others.

LaPierre, who had earned $5.1 million in total compensation in 2015 as the head of the NRA, also travels with armed body guards.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/08/nra-ceo-wont-back-bill-banning-bump-stocks/

$51 million for making sure that the crazies have enough guns and ammo to kill and wound hundreds at a time. Hooray, ain't that thar NRA wonderful.

This is where I part company with the NRA. I agree that gun control would not have prevented what happened however I disagree with them bump stocks. There is no valid reason for owning such a device. I support a narrow ban on anything that makes semi-automatic weapons fire like automatic weapons.

So then you want to ban fingers and thumbs because you can bump fire any semiautomatic rifle with just your 2 hands?

Really? How about a video demonstrating that? Here is one demonstrating the 'bump' stock;

What about the statement that you do not need a bump stock to bump fire a semiauto did you not understand?

What statement do you want to make that I find credible? I post links to prove my claims, whatever the venue. How about you doing the same. Why should I believe you any more than I believe the treasonous fat senile old orange clown?

 

[Skull Pilot]

58 dead, nearly 500 wounded, Vegas. 49 dead, 58 wounded, Orlando. 26 dead, including 20 young children, Sandy Hook. And weekly we hear of lesser slaughter with these types of weapons.

And still only 1% of all murders.

6 times as many people are murdered annually with knives than with rifles
more than twice as many are murdered with bare hands annually than with rifles

It's easy to be a knee jerk emotional moron though

Come at me with a knife, and there is a chance you will end up with that in your rectum. Bare hands, well most have age on me, but I have worked at very physical jobs all my life, and am still working at such. But stand off at some yardage with an assault weapon, and I don't have a chance. Not even when reloading is required.

OK Bruce Lee.

Why is it that the 99% of people murdered outside of mass shootings are less important to you?

 

[Skull Pilot]

WASHINGTON – The head of the National Rifle Association Sunday wouldn’t commit to a new law banning bump stocks in the wake of the Las Vegas massacre.

“There are monsters like this monster out there every day,” the CEO of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre told CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “There are menaces out there every day. People want to be able to protect themselves.”

LaPierre blamed the “elites” who “protect themselves with armed security” for trying to politicize the deadliest mass shooting in American history. Stephen Paddock sprayed bullets from his Las Vegas hotel room into a country music concert, killing 58 people and wounding 500 others.

LaPierre, who had earned $5.1 million in total compensation in 2015 as the head of the NRA, also travels with armed body guards.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/08/nra-ceo-wont-back-bill-banning-bump-stocks/

$51 million for making sure that the crazies have enough guns and ammo to kill and wound hundreds at a time. Hooray, ain't that thar NRA wonderful.

This is where I part company with the NRA. I agree that gun control would not have prevented what happened however I disagree with them bump stocks. There is no valid reason for owning such a device. I support a narrow ban on anything that makes semi-automatic weapons fire like automatic weapons.

So then you want to ban fingers and thumbs because you can bump fire any semiautomatic rifle with just your 2 hands?

Really? How about a video demonstrating that? Here is one demonstrating the 'bump' stock;

What about the statement that you do not need a bump stock to bump fire a semiauto did you not understand?

What statement do you want to make that I find credible? I post links to prove my claims, whatever the venue. How about you doing the same. Why should I believe you any more than I believe the treasonous fat senile old orange clown?

Anyone who knows anything about shooting a semiauto knows that you can bump fire with no device but since you're obviously not someone who knows anything about semiautomatic rifles here you go.

 

[jon_berzerk]

WASHINGTON – The head of the National Rifle Association Sunday wouldn’t commit to a new law banning bump stocks in the wake of the Las Vegas massacre.

“There are monsters like this monster out there every day,” the CEO of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre told CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “There are menaces out there every day. People want to be able to protect themselves.”

LaPierre blamed the “elites” who “protect themselves with armed security” for trying to politicize the deadliest mass shooting in American history. Stephen Paddock sprayed bullets from his Las Vegas hotel room into a country music concert, killing 58 people and wounding 500 others.

LaPierre, who had earned $5.1 million in total compensation in 2015 as the head of the NRA, also travels with armed body guards.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/08/nra-ceo-wont-back-bill-banning-bump-stocks/

$51 million for making sure that the crazies have enough guns and ammo to kill and wound hundreds at a time. Hooray, ain't that thar NRA wonderful.

why did obama make them legal in 2010 in the first place

 

[jon_berzerk]

This is where I part company with the NRA. I agree that gun control would not have prevented what happened however I disagree with them bump stocks. There is no valid reason for owning such a device. I support a narrow ban on anything that makes semi-automatic weapons fire like automatic weapons.

So then you want to ban fingers and thumbs because you can bump fire any semiautomatic rifle with just your 2 hands?

Really? How about a video demonstrating that? Here is one demonstrating the 'bump' stock;

What about the statement that you do not need a bump stock to bump fire a semiauto did you not understand?

What statement do you want to make that I find credible? I post links to prove my claims, whatever the venue. How about you doing the same. Why should I believe you any more than I believe the treasonous fat senile old orange clown?

Anyone who knows anything about shooting a semiauto knows that you can bump fire with no device but since you're obviously not someone who knows anything about semiautomatic rifles here you go.

no device needed

 

[Old Rocks]

This is where I part company with the NRA. I agree that gun control would not have prevented what happened however I disagree with them bump stocks. There is no valid reason for owning such a device. I support a narrow ban on anything that makes semi-automatic weapons fire like automatic weapons.

So then you want to ban fingers and thumbs because you can bump fire any semiautomatic rifle with just your 2 hands?

Really? How about a video demonstrating that? Here is one demonstrating the 'bump' stock;

What about the statement that you do not need a bump stock to bump fire a semiauto did you not understand?

What statement do you want to make that I find credible? I post links to prove my claims, whatever the venue. How about you doing the same. Why should I believe you any more than I believe the treasonous fat senile old orange clown?

Anyone who knows anything about shooting a semiauto knows that you can bump fire with no device but since you're obviously not someone who knows anything about semiautomatic rifles here you go.

Excellent. Good video. Beautiful reason to require anyone with a semi-auto off their property to have the same license as is required for a full auto .45 Thompson. Glad you posted the video.

 

[Old Rocks]

So then you want to ban fingers and thumbs because you can bump fire any semiautomatic rifle with just your 2 hands?

Really? How about a video demonstrating that? Here is one demonstrating the 'bump' stock;

What about the statement that you do not need a bump stock to bump fire a semiauto did you not understand?

What statement do you want to make that I find credible? I post links to prove my claims, whatever the venue. How about you doing the same. Why should I believe you any more than I believe the treasonous fat senile old orange clown?

Anyone who knows anything about shooting a semiauto knows that you can bump fire with no device but since you're obviously not someone who knows anything about semiautomatic rifles here you go.

no device needed

Now that we have established that these semi-autos are in fact machine guns, there is no reason for the laws concerning machine guns not to apply to them.

 

[jon_berzerk]

^^^idiot statement of the week^^^

 

[Skull Pilot]

So then you want to ban fingers and thumbs because you can bump fire any semiautomatic rifle with just your 2 hands?

Really? How about a video demonstrating that? Here is one demonstrating the 'bump' stock;

What about the statement that you do not need a bump stock to bump fire a semiauto did you not understand?

What statement do you want to make that I find credible? I post links to prove my claims, whatever the venue. How about you doing the same. Why should I believe you any more than I believe the treasonous fat senile old orange clown?

Anyone who knows anything about shooting a semiauto knows that you can bump fire with no device but since you're obviously not someone who knows anything about semiautomatic rifles here you go.

Excellent. Good video. Beautiful reason to require anyone with a semi-auto off their property to have the same license as is required for a full auto .45 Thompson. Glad you posted the video.

Only a control freak knee jerk emoticon for a brain moron would think that.

Semiautomatic rifles have been around since the middle of the 19th century.

 

[MikeK]

Well now, are not you so proud. Did you sell any to Paddock? And if one of those you sold them to shoots a hundred or so people, you are just going to count your profits, and laugh. You fuckers are sickening. I hope you end up bankrupt and homeless.

Do you think banning the bump-stock will put an end to terrorist attacks?

 

[busybee01]

WASHINGTON – The head of the National Rifle Association Sunday wouldn’t commit to a new law banning bump stocks in the wake of the Las Vegas massacre.

“There are monsters like this monster out there every day,” the CEO of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre told CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “There are menaces out there every day. People want to be able to protect themselves.”

LaPierre blamed the “elites” who “protect themselves with armed security” for trying to politicize the deadliest mass shooting in American history. Stephen Paddock sprayed bullets from his Las Vegas hotel room into a country music concert, killing 58 people and wounding 500 others.

LaPierre, who had earned $5.1 million in total compensation in 2015 as the head of the NRA, also travels with armed body guards.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/08/nra-ceo-wont-back-bill-banning-bump-stocks/

$51 million for making sure that the crazies have enough guns and ammo to kill and wound hundreds at a time. Hooray, ain't that thar NRA wonderful.

This is where I part company with the NRA. I agree that gun control would not have prevented what happened however I disagree with them bump stocks. There is no valid reason for owning such a device. I support a narrow ban on anything that makes semi-automatic weapons fire like automatic weapons.

So then you want to ban fingers and thumbs because you can bump fire any semiautomatic rifle with just your 2 hands?

Bump stocks have no purpose other than turn a semi-automatic into a automatic. There is no reason for having this.

 

[RealDave]

Wayne LaPierre should STFU. He is an anti-American who trades dead children to prop up his corporate financiers. He operates against law enforcement by making it easy for criminals to but semiautomatic weapons with cop killer bullets.

The NRA is a terrorist organization & every one of its members should be arrested & tried & hung for treason.

**** thew NRA. **** Wayne LaPierre.

Hey Dave I'm still waiting for your expert analysis and explanation on how an AR 15 is functionally different enough from a Ruger Mini 14 that it should be banned.

The difference is one is dressed with features that give you & your ilk hard on every time you grasp it.

If there is no difference, why do you care that one was banned when you can still get the other? Huh Huh Huh answer that. answer that OMG OMG OMG

Both should have been banned.
'

 

[RealDave]

Well now, are not you so proud. Did you sell any to Paddock? And if one of those you sold them to shoots a hundred or so people, you are just going to count your profits, and laugh. You fuckers are sickening. I hope you end up bankrupt and homeless.

Do you think banning the bump-stock will put an end to terrorist attacks?

Yep that must be iot. You are the dumbest person from Texas. That is saying a lot.

The attacks would have a lower death tally. How about that jackass.

My God you people are stupid.

 

[RealDave]

WASHINGTON – The head of the National Rifle Association Sunday wouldn’t commit to a new law banning bump stocks in the wake of the Las Vegas massacre.

“There are monsters like this monster out there every day,” the CEO of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre told CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “There are menaces out there every day. People want to be able to protect themselves.”

LaPierre blamed the “elites” who “protect themselves with armed security” for trying to politicize the deadliest mass shooting in American history. Stephen Paddock sprayed bullets from his Las Vegas hotel room into a country music concert, killing 58 people and wounding 500 others.

LaPierre, who had earned $5.1 million in total compensation in 2015 as the head of the NRA, also travels with armed body guards.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/08/nra-ceo-wont-back-bill-banning-bump-stocks/

$51 million for making sure that the crazies have enough guns and ammo to kill and wound hundreds at a time. Hooray, ain't that thar NRA wonderful.

why did obama make them legal in 2010 in the first place

Actually, dumbass, ATF said there was no law or regulation they violated. Laws about devices to change a semi to an auto did not apply.

 

[Skull Pilot]

WASHINGTON – The head of the National Rifle Association Sunday wouldn’t commit to a new law banning bump stocks in the wake of the Las Vegas massacre.

“There are monsters like this monster out there every day,” the CEO of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre told CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “There are menaces out there every day. People want to be able to protect themselves.”

LaPierre blamed the “elites” who “protect themselves with armed security” for trying to politicize the deadliest mass shooting in American history. Stephen Paddock sprayed bullets from his Las Vegas hotel room into a country music concert, killing 58 people and wounding 500 others.

LaPierre, who had earned $5.1 million in total compensation in 2015 as the head of the NRA, also travels with armed body guards.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/08/nra-ceo-wont-back-bill-banning-bump-stocks/

$51 million for making sure that the crazies have enough guns and ammo to kill and wound hundreds at a time. Hooray, ain't that thar NRA wonderful.

This is where I part company with the NRA. I agree that gun control would not have prevented what happened however I disagree with them bump stocks. There is no valid reason for owning such a device. I support a narrow ban on anything that makes semi-automatic weapons fire like automatic weapons.

So then you want to ban fingers and thumbs because you can bump fire any semiautomatic rifle with just your 2 hands?

Bump stocks have no purpose other than turn a semi-automatic into a automatic. There is no reason for having this.

So do you want to ban fingers and thumbs since that is all you need to bump fire a rife?

 

[Skull Pilot]

Wayne LaPierre should STFU. He is an anti-American who trades dead children to prop up his corporate financiers. He operates against law enforcement by making it easy for criminals to but semiautomatic weapons with cop killer bullets.

The NRA is a terrorist organization & every one of its members should be arrested & tried & hung for treason.

**** thew NRA. **** Wayne LaPierre.

Hey Dave I'm still waiting for your expert analysis and explanation on how an AR 15 is functionally different enough from a Ruger Mini 14 that it should be banned.

The difference is one is dressed with features that give you & your ilk hard on every time you grasp it.

If there is no difference, why do you care that one was banned when you can still get the other? Huh Huh Huh answer that. answer that OMG OMG OMG

Both should have been banned.
'

Oh there's an intelligent answer.

I guess I really didn't expect anything else from such a ******* idiot.

 

[jon_berzerk]

WASHINGTON – The head of the National Rifle Association Sunday wouldn’t commit to a new law banning bump stocks in the wake of the Las Vegas massacre.

“There are monsters like this monster out there every day,” the CEO of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre told CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “There are menaces out there every day. People want to be able to protect themselves.”

LaPierre blamed the “elites” who “protect themselves with armed security” for trying to politicize the deadliest mass shooting in American history. Stephen Paddock sprayed bullets from his Las Vegas hotel room into a country music concert, killing 58 people and wounding 500 others.

LaPierre, who had earned $5.1 million in total compensation in 2015 as the head of the NRA, also travels with armed body guards.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/08/nra-ceo-wont-back-bill-banning-bump-stocks/

$51 million for making sure that the crazies have enough guns and ammo to kill and wound hundreds at a time. Hooray, ain't that thar NRA wonderful.

why did obama make them legal in 2010 in the first place

Actually, dumbass, ATF said there was no law or regulation they violated. Laws about devices to change a semi to an auto did not apply.

the obama admin failed to regulate them that is a fact retard

hey **** head the ATF authorized the bumpfire to be a legal product that is not a controlled firearm shit -for-brains

when the question and a bumpfire stock was presented to the ATF for evaluation ya dumb **** leftard

https://www.slidefire.com/downloads/BATFE.pdf

 

[RealDave]

WASHINGTON – The head of the National Rifle Association Sunday wouldn’t commit to a new law banning bump stocks in the wake of the Las Vegas massacre.

“There are monsters like this monster out there every day,” the CEO of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre told CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “There are menaces out there every day. People want to be able to protect themselves.”

LaPierre blamed the “elites” who “protect themselves with armed security” for trying to politicize the deadliest mass shooting in American history. Stephen Paddock sprayed bullets from his Las Vegas hotel room into a country music concert, killing 58 people and wounding 500 others.

LaPierre, who had earned $5.1 million in total compensation in 2015 as the head of the NRA, also travels with armed body guards.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/08/nra-ceo-wont-back-bill-banning-bump-stocks/

$51 million for making sure that the crazies have enough guns and ammo to kill and wound hundreds at a time. Hooray, ain't that thar NRA wonderful.

why did obama make them legal in 2010 in the first place

Actually, dumbass, ATF said there was no law or regulation they violated. Laws about devices to change a semi to an auto did not apply.

the obama admin failed to regulate them that is a fact retard

hey **** head the ATF authorized the bumpfire to be a legal product that is not a controlled firearm shit -for-brains

when the question and a bumpfire stock was presented to the ATF for evaluation ya dumb **** leftard

https://www.slidefire.com/downloads/BATFE.pdf

A reason to ban Bump Stocks was needed to ban them. The device was compared to existing law. The existing law did not dictate they be banned.