Progressive Propaganda: The Fracking Edition

[P@triot]

Even the EPA was forced to acknowledge that there is absolutely no evidence that fracking poses an environmental risk. We continue to see the left manufacture lie after lie to fulfill their quest for wealth and control.

The Pennsylvania complaint and others like it from across the country prompted a five-year, $29 million Environmental Protection Agency study

Their lies are costing the tax payers hundreds of billions of dollars every year in studies, investigations, subsidies, etc.

EPA Makes an About-Face on Fracking Report

 

[P@triot]

A report released Monday by the Academy of Medicine, Engineering and Science of Texas, based in Austin, concluded the following...

Hydraulic fracturing hasn’t contaminated groundwater in Texas, isn’t an earthquake hazard, and has been a boon for the state’s economy, according to a study released Monday.

The progressives continue to prevent progress with their regressive attempts to prevent the harvesting of abundant, affordable energy. The report also concluded the following...

However, in a sixth category, transportation, the report found that fracking produced a surge of trucks, damaging pavement at an estimated cost to state taxpayers of $1.5 billion to $2 billion per year. Even so, the study concluded that fracking adds $473 billion to the Texas economy and created 3.8 billion jobs.

Lots of jobs, lots of income, lots of tax revenues to the state, and affordable energy for all. And yet the regressive continue to try to stop fracking and all other forms of "non-renewable" energy.

Study: Fracking No Harm to Drinking Water in Texas

 

[P@triot]

You can add a study by researchers at the University of Duke to the list of entities which have confirmed that fracking causes no risk to the environment.

New study is disastrous news for fracking opponents, global warming alarmists

 

[Mousterian]

'Lots of jobs, lots of income, lots of tax revenues to the state, and affordable energy for all.'
You didn't mention lots of CO2, fugitive emissions and pollution.

 

[WheelieAddict]

Glad my state banned fracking for the time being. No chance for a mistake to destroy the beautiful geology the ice ages have left here.

 

[P@triot]

'Lots of jobs, lots of income, lots of tax revenues to the state, and affordable energy for all.'
You didn't mention lots of CO2, fugitive emissions and pollution.

Because fracking doesn't cause any of that, science denier.

 

[Disir]

And earthquakes from the waste water. Change of guards and a whole change of science.

 

[P@triot]

Once again, the Obama Administration's own studies showed that the safest choice was the Republican's agenda. Further proof that the left doesn't give a shit about America - they care about power.

Are Pipelines Safe? | PragerU

What’s the safest way to transport oil? According to environmentalists, progressive politicians, and the media, it’s anything but pipelines. Are they right?…

www.prageru.com

 

[P@triot]

The left doesn’t even believe their own lies on “fossil fuels”. Not a one of them have given up electricity in their homes or sold their private jets.

Heritage Foundation President Schools The New York Times on Climate Alarmism, Clean Energy

Green energy policies are pushing everyone—on all continents—toward energy poverty. Climate alarmism is a large part of the problem.

www.dailysignal.com