Neither did the 3 year olds.I went to college. Big State University.
I never heard a goddamn word about 3-year-olds having access to guns.
.
7 toddlers a day killed?
Progressive Propaganda: The 2nd Amendment Edition
- Thread starter P@triot
- Start date
7 toddlers a day killed?
Down 75% from the good old mafia days?
I feel better
Still 10x Europe.
Ah well , we are a country founded by slave owners, convicts and religious nuts.
Violent genes, what do we expect?
Returning
Returning your commie SS Medicare mr self righteous?For it.I went to college. Big State University.
I never heard a goddamn word about 3-year-olds having access to guns.
.
How about mandatory gun safety classes starting in Pre School and going right on up through the Penitentiary Level?
100%.
Commies are against it because it teaches children to NOT fear and loath guns.
.
Sent from trench warfare against ISIS big boy?For it.I went to college. Big State University.
I never heard a goddamn word about 3-year-olds having access to guns.
.
How about mandatory gun safety classes starting in Pre School and going right on up through the Penitentiary Level?
100%.
Commies are against it because it teaches children to NOT fear and loath guns.
.
M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
In reality no one QUESTIONED the private right to gun ownership until the circuit courts deliberately misinterpreted Miller.
If you had taken even the most basic con law course, you'd know this.
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,558
- 52,805
- 2,290
And Europe murdered 12 million innocent men, women and children in the 1940s.......we were founded when? I think the crimes of Europe are far worse today......
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,558
- 52,805
- 2,290
When do you consider "the good old mafia days" Since the current reduction of gun murder, 49%, happened over the last 26 years when more people now own and carry guns....
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,558
- 52,805
- 2,290
Neither did the 3 year olds.I went to college. Big State University.
I never heard a goddamn word about 3-year-olds having access to guns.
.
7 toddlers a day killed?
There aren't that many kids killed with guns you asshat....this is why we can't stand morons like you......you lie about every aspect of gun ownership and crime...simply because of a mental illness centered on guns...
Here...actual facts...
Fatal Injury Data | WISQARS | Injury Center | CDC
2017, gun murder...319
<1...12
1-4...44
5-9...78
10-14...185
I feel a lot better now.Neither did the 3 year olds.I went to college. Big State University.
I never heard a goddamn word about 3-year-olds having access to guns.
.
7 toddlers a day killed?
There aren't that many kids killed with guns you asshat....this is why we can't stand morons like you......you lie about every aspect of gun ownership and crime...simply because of a mental illness centered on guns...
Here...actual facts...
Fatal Injury Data | WISQARS | Injury Center | CDC
2017, gun murder...319
<1...12
1-4...44
5-9...78
10-14...185
Couldn't resist the 2 nd grade insult white zero college boy?
Why do you blurb pantywaist 2 nd amendment garbage.?Neither did the 3 year olds.I went to college. Big State University.
I never heard a goddamn word about 3-year-olds having access to guns.
.
7 toddlers a day killed?
There aren't that many kids killed with guns you asshat....this is why we can't stand morons like you......you lie about every aspect of gun ownership and crime...simply because of a mental illness centered on guns...
Here...actual facts...
Fatal Injury Data | WISQARS | Injury Center | CDC
2017, gun murder...319
<1...12
1-4...44
5-9...78
10-14...185
No one I know want to ban all guns bit you keep blabbing it.
Think we all should have a tank in our garages?
Here's a nice commie link for you
How The NRA Worked To Stifle Gun Violence Research
How do you respond to a Star Trek living in the 50 year past boy?Neither did the 3 year olds.I went to college. Big State University.
I never heard a goddamn word about 3-year-olds having access to guns.
.
7 toddlers a day killed?
There aren't that many kids killed with guns you asshat....this is why we can't stand morons like you......you lie about every aspect of gun ownership and crime...simply because of a mental illness centered on guns...
Here...actual facts...
Fatal Injury Data | WISQARS | Injury Center | CDC
2017, gun murder...319
<1...12
1-4...44
5-9...78
10-14...185
Let me guess, sucking off his socialist SS Medicare VA benefits?
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,558
- 52,805
- 2,290
Why do you blurb pantywaist 2 nd amendment garbage.?Neither did the 3 year olds.I went to college. Big State University.
I never heard a goddamn word about 3-year-olds having access to guns.
.
7 toddlers a day killed?
There aren't that many kids killed with guns you asshat....this is why we can't stand morons like you......you lie about every aspect of gun ownership and crime...simply because of a mental illness centered on guns...
Here...actual facts...
Fatal Injury Data | WISQARS | Injury Center | CDC
2017, gun murder...319
<1...12
1-4...44
5-9...78
10-14...185
No one I know want to ban all guns bit you keep blabbing it.
Think we all should have a tank in our garages?
Here's a nice commie link for you
How The NRA Worked To Stifle Gun Violence Research
And no, the NRA did nothing to stop gun violence research...
No, The Government Is Not 'Banned' From Studying Gun Violence
Absolutely nothing in the amendment prohibits the CDC from studying “gun violence,” even if this narrowly focused topic tells us little. In response to this inconvenient fact, gun controllers will explain that while there isn’t an outright ban, the Dickey amendment has a “chilling” effect on the study of gun violence.
Does it? Pointing out that “research plummeted after the 1996 ban” could just as easily tell us that most research funded by the CDC had been politically motivated. Because the idea that the CDC, whose spectacular mission creep has taken it from its primary goal of preventing malaria and other dangerous communicable diseases, to spending hundreds of millions of dollars nagging you about how much salt you put on your steaks or how often you do calisthenics, is nervous about the repercussions of engaging in non-partisan research is hard to believe.
Also unlikely is the notion that a $2.6 million cut in funding so horrified the agency that it was rendered powerless to pay for or conduct studies on gun violence. The CDC funding tripled from 1996 to 2010. The CDC’s budget is over six billion dollars today.
And the idea that the CDC was paralyzed through two-years of full Democratic Party control, and then six years under a president who was more antagonistic towards the Second Amendment than any other in history, is difficult to believe, because it’s provably false.
In 2013, President Barack Obama not only signed an Executive Order directing the CDC to research “gun violence,” the administration also provided an additional $10 million to do it. Here is the study on gun violence that was supposedly banned and yet funded by the CDC. You might not have heard about the resulting research, because it contains numerous inconvenient facts about gun ownership that fails to propel the predetermined narrative. Trump’s HHS Secretary Alex Azar is also open to the idea of funding more gun violence research.
It’s not banned. It’s not chilled.
Meanwhile, numerous states and private entities fund peer-reviewed studies and other research on gun violence. I know this because gun control advocates are constantly sending me studies that distort and conflate issues to help them make their arguments. My inbox is bombarded with studies and conferences and “webinars” dissecting gun violence.
The real problem here is two-fold. One, researchers want the CDC involved so they can access government data about American gun owners. Considering the rhetoric coming from Democrats — gun ownership being tantamount to terrorism, and so on — there’s absolutely no reason Republicans should acquiesce to helping gun controllers circumvent the privacy of Americans citizens peacefully practicing their Constitutional rights.
Second, gun control advocates want to lift the ban on politically skewed research because they’re interested in producing politically skewed research. When the American Medical Association declares gun violence a “public health crisis,” it’s not interested in a balance look at the issue. When researchers advocate lifting the restrictions on advocacy at the CDC, they don’t even pretend they not to hold pre-conceived notions about the outcomes.
-------
There’s no reason to allow activists — then or now — to use the veneer of state-sanctioned science for their partisan purposes. For example, we now know that Rosenberg and others at the CDC turned out to be wrong about the correlation between guns and crime — a steep drop in gun crimes coincided with the explosions of gun ownership from 1996 to 2014.
M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
Anti-gun loons simply want their like-mined friends in the CDC to make recommendations as to how gun violence can be curbed -- if the CDC says so, they believe the average American will be more likely to agree.
They know their ideas don't fly on their own, see, so they want to use the power of government to support them.
Daryl Hunt
Your Worst Nightmare
- Banned
- #814
How do you respond to a Star Trek living in the 50 year past boy?Neither did the 3 year olds.I went to college. Big State University.
I never heard a goddamn word about 3-year-olds having access to guns.
.
7 toddlers a day killed?
There aren't that many kids killed with guns you asshat....this is why we can't stand morons like you......you lie about every aspect of gun ownership and crime...simply because of a mental illness centered on guns...
Here...actual facts...
Fatal Injury Data | WISQARS | Injury Center | CDC
2017, gun murder...319
<1...12
1-4...44
5-9...78
10-14...185
Let me guess, sucking off his socialist SS Medicare VA benefits?
1. That money in the SSI account is MINE. No one elses. And you need to keep your grubby hands off it. Plus, pay back what you already stole from it.
1. I paid with my mind and body for those VA Benefits. Without my payment and others like me, you wouldn't have the freedom to come in here and act like the fool you do. Instead, Big Brother would come to your house and arrest you and jail you for speaking what little mind you have. You didn't pay for the RIGHT to have freedom. Someone paid for you to have that right. I sometimes wonder if it was worth it until I see others that do deserve the rights.
3. If the only thing you learned in life was from Captain James T. Kirk you would be a lot better off than you are right now. Love, Duty, Honor and more. Instead, you were raised by grubs.
P@triot
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #815
Oh sweetie...I've forgotten more about the U.S. Constitution than you and everyone you known combined will ever know.
It has been universally accepted since the very beginning that firearm ownership was exclusively a "private right" as all rights are. Just as anyone has a 1st Amendment right (without being a member of the press), everyone has a 2nd Amendment right (without being a member of a militia).
Thomas Jefferson said so. George Washington said so. James Madison said so. In fact, 100% of the founders and people who created the U.S. Constitution (and subsequent Bill of Rights) said so. You lose. As always.
Gawd, is that all you do?Why do you blurb pantywaist 2 nd amendment garbage.?Neither did the 3 year olds.I went to college. Big State University.
I never heard a goddamn word about 3-year-olds having access to guns.
.
7 toddlers a day killed?
There aren't that many kids killed with guns you asshat....this is why we can't stand morons like you......you lie about every aspect of gun ownership and crime...simply because of a mental illness centered on guns...
Here...actual facts...
Fatal Injury Data | WISQARS | Injury Center | CDC
2017, gun murder...319
<1...12
1-4...44
5-9...78
10-14...185
No one I know want to ban all guns bit you keep blabbing it.
Think we all should have a tank in our garages?
Here's a nice commie link for you
How The NRA Worked To Stifle Gun Violence Research
And no, the NRA did nothing to stop gun violence research...
No, The Government Is Not 'Banned' From Studying Gun Violence
Absolutely nothing in the amendment prohibits the CDC from studying “gun violence,” even if this narrowly focused topic tells us little. In response to this inconvenient fact, gun controllers will explain that while there isn’t an outright ban, the Dickey amendment has a “chilling” effect on the study of gun violence.
Does it? Pointing out that “research plummeted after the 1996 ban” could just as easily tell us that most research funded by the CDC had been politically motivated. Because the idea that the CDC, whose spectacular mission creep has taken it from its primary goal of preventing malaria and other dangerous communicable diseases, to spending hundreds of millions of dollars nagging you about how much salt you put on your steaks or how often you do calisthenics, is nervous about the repercussions of engaging in non-partisan research is hard to believe.
Also unlikely is the notion that a $2.6 million cut in funding so horrified the agency that it was rendered powerless to pay for or conduct studies on gun violence. The CDC funding tripled from 1996 to 2010. The CDC’s budget is over six billion dollars today.
And the idea that the CDC was paralyzed through two-years of full Democratic Party control, and then six years under a president who was more antagonistic towards the Second Amendment than any other in history, is difficult to believe, because it’s provably false.
In 2013, President Barack Obama not only signed an Executive Order directing the CDC to research “gun violence,” the administration also provided an additional $10 million to do it. Here is the study on gun violence that was supposedly banned and yet funded by the CDC. You might not have heard about the resulting research, because it contains numerous inconvenient facts about gun ownership that fails to propel the predetermined narrative. Trump’s HHS Secretary Alex Azar is also open to the idea of funding more gun violence research.
It’s not banned. It’s not chilled.
Meanwhile, numerous states and private entities fund peer-reviewed studies and other research on gun violence. I know this because gun control advocates are constantly sending me studies that distort and conflate issues to help them make their arguments. My inbox is bombarded with studies and conferences and “webinars” dissecting gun violence.
The real problem here is two-fold. One, researchers want the CDC involved so they can access government data about American gun owners. Considering the rhetoric coming from Democrats — gun ownership being tantamount to terrorism, and so on — there’s absolutely no reason Republicans should acquiesce to helping gun controllers circumvent the privacy of Americans citizens peacefully practicing their Constitutional rights.
Second, gun control advocates want to lift the ban on politically skewed research because they’re interested in producing politically skewed research. When the American Medical Association declares gun violence a “public health crisis,” it’s not interested in a balance look at the issue. When researchers advocate lifting the restrictions on advocacy at the CDC, they don’t even pretend they not to hold pre-conceived notions about the outcomes.
-------
There’s no reason to allow activists — then or now — to use the veneer of state-sanctioned science for their partisan purposes. For example, we now know that Rosenberg and others at the CDC turned out to be wrong about the correlation between guns and crime — a steep drop in gun crimes coincided with the explosions of gun ownership from 1996 to 2014.
Cut and paste.
Quit sucking off your socialist benefits and get a life.
So you don't believe the NRA minimizes gun data?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
US appeals court rejects Trump bid to revoke thousands of migrants' status- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
Michelle Obama whines about having to buy her own food while living free in White House.- Started by Nostra
- Replies: 1
