Preparing for the Steal

[Lastamender]

Have to ask yourself why this is even necessary. Intimidation from a 501C.

“Election Defense Fund, Inc. is a 501(c) (4) dedicated to protecting this year's election results, and standing up against those who attempt to delay certification.”
“Election Defense Fund, Inc will identify local election officials who are most likely to not certify or otherwise attempt to interfere with results; educate the public to remind election officials of their duty to follow the law and the potential consequences of not doing so; support lawsuits that seek to force election officials to uphold their legal duties, and defend election officials who are harassed, targeted, or sued for doing their lawful duties.”

If the election cannot be scrutinized, why even have one? The voters in GA. do not trust their government. This gives them another reason not to.

Preparing for the Steal

Why is Georgia’s Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger quietly raising $5 million to “identify local election officials” who might challenge election results

truthovernews.org

 

[toobfreak]

Have to ask yourself why this is even necessary. If the election cannot be scrutinized, why even have one?

If the election cannot be scrutinized, they can get away with anything. Can you imagine if Trump or some republican tried to run an election behind closed doors where you could neither see nor question much less challenge anything?

THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF A COUP. Define your opponents who might seek to expose you as criminals, much like anyone speaking out against the rulers of China, North Korea or the USSR.

All Raffensperger has to do if challenged with questions is open his books and prove his state election was honest and fair.

But apparently /transparency/ is now a dirty word in the "democracy" of the democrats.

 

[boevans]

Pa Mi Wi NV Ne-2 Harris.

She has at least 270.

 

[jwoodie]

Three hurdles before inauguration:
1. Ballot fraud
2. More lawfare/claims that Trump is ineligible
3. Refusal to count electoral votes

I give each of them a 20% chance of succeeding. That means that, even if he gets more actual votes, Trump will only have a ~50% chance of taking office in January.

 

[Lastamender]

Pa Mi Wi NV Ne-2 Harris.

She has at least 270.

She has shit and shoved in it. Get real.

 

[boevans]

She has shit and shoved in it. Get real.

Creepamender, you are going to lose by your fingertips.

 

[Lastamender]

Creepamender, you are going to lose by your fingertips.

You going to go out and burn cities down when Trump wins?

 

[boevans]

Why? Stupid comment, creepyminder.

 

[boedicca]

All the Dems have left to play are the lawfare and civill unrest cards. Their policies suck and they have cackling empty vessel for a candidate. Watch out for the Feds and their Antifa vanguard to LARP a rightwing insurrection.

 

[boevans]

She has shit and shoved in it. Get real.

She will win.

 

[boevans]

You going to go out and burn cities down when Trump wins?

Didn't last time. I will accept the election. Even if you don't like the result, you will not resist it unlawfully.

 

[Lastamender]

Didn't last time. I will accept the election. Even if you don't like the result, you will not resist it unlawfully.

Contesting an election has never been illegal. Either has resisting. Dumbass.

 

[boevans]

You will not resist a lawful and fair election without paying the price.

 

[braalian]

If the election cannot be scrutinized, why even have one?

The 2016 election was the most highly scrutinized election in American history.

 

[Lastamender]

The 2016 election was the most highly scrutinized election in American history.

2020 sure wasn't.

 

[braalian]

2020 sure wasn't.

I actually meant to say 2020

 

[westwall]

I actually meant to say 2020

You're wrong.

 

[JWBooth]

Preparing for the Steal​

The fuckery will always be one step ahead of you. The ones 'enforcing' the law where the steal takes place are the ones involved in the steal.