Portuguese court finds PCR test 97% inaccurate for diagnosing COVID

Burgermeister

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Jan 23, 2021
6,388
7,261
1,938

Summary of ruling by Portuguese court with links to original - before the usual geniuses dismiss this because of the source. This whole thing was a scam.​

Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives

The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.

They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.

The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.

...

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”
 

Summary of ruling by Portuguese court with links to original - before the usual geniuses dismiss this because of the source. This whole thing was a scam.​

Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives

The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.

They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.

The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.

...

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”


are we still using the pcr? shouldn't our dynamic job creators have a better test by now?
 
are we still using the pcr? shouldn't our dynamic job creators have a better test by now?
They don't want a better test. They need to be able to manipulate it to create a panic and subsequent funding and regulatory relief over false numbers. Even the PCR inventor knows the deal - The purported increase in “cases” is a direct consequence of increased testing through the inappropriate use of the PCR instrument to diagnose so-called COVID-19. It has been well established that the PCR test was never designed or intended as a diagnostic tool and is not an acceptable instrument to measure this so-called pandemic. Its inventor, Kary Mullis, has clearly indicated that the PCR testing device was never created to test for coronavirus Mullis warns that, “the PCR Test can be used to find almost anything, in anybody. If you can amplify one single molecule, then you can find it because that molecule is nearly in every single person”2
 
They don't want a better test. They need to be able to manipulate it to create a panic and subsequent funding and regulatory relief over false numbers. Even the PCR inventor knows the deal - The purported increase in “cases” is a direct consequence of increased testing through the inappropriate use of the PCR instrument to diagnose so-called COVID-19. It has been well established that the PCR test was never designed or intended as a diagnostic tool and is not an acceptable instrument to measure this so-called pandemic. Its inventor, Kary Mullis, has clearly indicated that the PCR testing device was never created to test for coronavirus Mullis warns that, “the PCR Test can be used to find almost anything, in anybody. If you can amplify one single molecule, then you can find it because that molecule is nearly in every single person”2
of course we want a better test. who doesn't?

"we need less testing. the more we test the worse my numbers look." trump
 

Summary of ruling by Portuguese court with links to original - before the usual geniuses dismiss this because of the source. This whole thing was a scam.​

Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives

The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.

They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.

The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.

...

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”

Fucking Russian Propaganda right from Russia Today. A propaganda arm of Pooty's dictatorship.
 

Summary of ruling by Portuguese court with links to original - before the usual geniuses dismiss this because of the source. This whole thing was a scam.​

Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives

The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.

They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.

The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.

...

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”
iu


"Kary Banks Mullis (December 28, 1944 – August 7, 2019) was an American biochemist. In recognition of his role in the invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, he shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith[2] and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year. PCR became a central technique in biochemistry and molecular biology, described by The New York Times as "highly original and significant, virtually dividing biology into the two epochs of before PCR and after PCR."[3]. . ."


PCR Test Founder Kary Mullis Speaks Out Against the Misinterpretation of the PCR Test​



Dr. Kary Mullis on Anthony Fauci​

 
They don't want a better test. They need to be able to manipulate it to create a panic and subsequent funding and regulatory relief over false numbers. Even the PCR inventor knows the deal - The purported increase in “cases” is a direct consequence of increased testing through the inappropriate use of the PCR instrument to diagnose so-called COVID-19. It has been well established that the PCR test was never designed or intended as a diagnostic tool and is not an acceptable instrument to measure this so-called pandemic. Its inventor, Kary Mullis, has clearly indicated that the PCR testing device was never created to test for coronavirus Mullis warns that, “the PCR Test can be used to find almost anything, in anybody. If you can amplify one single molecule, then you can find it because that molecule is nearly in every single person”2
Sometimes I wonder. .. if the establishment purposely just waited until Kary Mullis was dead and buried before they pulled this scam.

:tinfoil:
 
The story was lifted from RT (Russia Today). RT is a Russian Propaganda site pushing Pooty's words to those ignorant few who do know and/or do not that they getting Russian State Approved Propaganda.
8s5qqd.jpg


The article links right to the documents, you can use a translator, if you like. You are just using fallacious attacks, because you know it is a factual report. The evidence is in the article.

8s5qo8.jpg
 
8s5qqd.jpg


The article links right to the documents, you can use a translator, if you like. You are just using fallacious attacks, because you know it is a factual report. The evidence is in the article.

8s5qo8.jpg

Yeah, but these are the same people that will scream that you're an anti-vaxxer because you refuse to take an mRNA injection but have had almost all conventional vaccines. They're oblivious or afraid to acknowledge the real truth of these injections.
 
Yeah, but these are the same people that will scream that you're an anti-vaxxer because you refuse to take an mRNA injection but have had almost all conventional vaccines. They're oblivious or afraid to acknowledge the real truth of these injections.

Russian Propaganda is Russian Propaganda.
 
Yeah, but these are the same people that will scream that you're an anti-vaxxer because you refuse to take an mRNA injection but have had almost all conventional vaccines. They're oblivious or afraid to acknowledge the real truth of these injections.
Agreed, the establishment equivocates, but they cannot hide or change the facts.

1717340474217.png

 
It's russian propaganda if it's coming from the state. You still don't get it though. The source isn't from russia. Weird how you believe US propaganda and lies and there was a ton coming out our own govt on covid.

You lying through your eye teeth. Russia Today is a Russian State Propaganda Organ the dictatorship of the Communist Vladmir Putin. I do not read Russian Propaganda, you people swim in it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top