iamwhatiseem
Diamond Member
It is always interesting to rewatch a movie you really liked many years ago.
Does the movie stand the test of time? And does your older self still like it?
The movie still works, but it has the same problems it did in 1991 - pretty atrocious acting, a lacking script - but despite that, everyone still likes it. It just works, even though on paper it shouldn't.
I wonder what does Reeves, himself, think of this movie. It is consistently rated in his top 5 movies of all time. Yet, it is also considered among his worst acting performances. I would think he wishes this wasn't true.
At any rate - the movie still works. It has an endearing quality to it that isn't easy to define. A good example of a similar movie where on paper it should have bombed is Venom. On paper, it should have bombed. But audiences loved it.
Does the movie stand the test of time? And does your older self still like it?
The movie still works, but it has the same problems it did in 1991 - pretty atrocious acting, a lacking script - but despite that, everyone still likes it. It just works, even though on paper it shouldn't.
I wonder what does Reeves, himself, think of this movie. It is consistently rated in his top 5 movies of all time. Yet, it is also considered among his worst acting performances. I would think he wishes this wasn't true.
At any rate - the movie still works. It has an endearing quality to it that isn't easy to define. A good example of a similar movie where on paper it should have bombed is Venom. On paper, it should have bombed. But audiences loved it.