Her DNA proves that she may have
1/64 Native American DNA. Where do you get that her DNA "proves" she does not have N.A. ancestry? That's just stupid. And it is not proven
Report: Harvard did not consider Warren as Native American
September 2, 2018
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) — Harvard University’s decision to hire Elizabeth Warren as a law professor in the 1990s was not based on any assertion that she has Native American heritage, according to a report by the Boston Globe.
The newspaper reports that interviews and documents show the issue was not considered by Harvard Law faculty or those who admitted the now U.S. senator from Massachusetts to law school at Rutgers or to jobs at The University of Houston, The University of Texas, and the University of Pennsylvania.
“She was not on the radar screen at all in terms of a racial minority hire,” Randall Kennedy, a law professor who was in charge of recruiting minority candidates to Harvard Law School, told the Globe. “It was just not an issue. I can’t remember anybody ever mentioning her in this context.”
The Globe reports that it examined hundreds of documents, many of them never before available, and talked to 31 law school professors from that period at Harvard. All but one said her Native American heritage was not discussed as part of the decision to hire her. One said he was unsure if the issue came up, but if it did, it had no bearing on his vote.
I agree with you that she "took advantage" saying that she had Native ancestry when filling out applications at institutions she knew were interested in cultural diversity. YES she did that. It had no bearing on her hiring.
Dumb ***** her DNA showed she is 1/1024th native american. TRUMP is more native american than that dumb *****.
Elizabeth Warren might have actually made things worse with her DNA gambit - CNNPolitics
No, her DNA showed she is between 1/64th (third gr-grandmother or gr-gr grandmother who is mixed) and 1/1024. I does not PROVE she doesn't have native heritage, but if you can't see that, you're too stupid to explain it to.
Wrong,
It only showed 1 in 1924th it did not show anything remotely close to 1 64th
That is fact
You really do not know what the **** you are talking about.
And according to Native Americans it shows she was a liar when she claimed to be one because that miniscule amount of DNA doe snot meat their standards.
She is a privileged lily white liar who tried to cheat and got caught
"One of these segments is larger than the others, spanning about 4.7 million bases, and further analysis indicates this DNA chunk has a genetic signature one would expect from a person having European and Native American heritage. The total length of all of Warren’s Native American-assigned segments is about 12.3 million bases, which the report states is about 12.4 times greater than the average in the Great Britain reference population, and 10.5 times greater than the average in the Utah population. Bustamante concludes there is “strong evidence” for a Native American ancestor roughly six to 10 generations ago."
The Facts on Elizabeth Warren’s DNA Test - FactCheck.org
6-10 Generations ago.
1/2 if one of your parents were NA
1/4 if one of the grandparents
1/8 if one of the great grandparents were N/A
1/16 if one of the great great
1/32 if one of the great great great
1/64 if one of the great great great 6th generation
1/128 7th
1/256 8th
1/512 9th
1/1064 10th
So why are you lying about this?
Warren NEVER EVER claimed to be a member of any tribe.