ROFL
YOU demand a link?
YOU???:
{
She had a dilemma. She could put the results in a drawer, but if she did that and they leaked somehow, itād be a scandal. Sheād be guilty not only of having exaggerated
extremely remote Native American ancestry, sheād be guilty of covering it up. Trump would never let her hear the end of it. So instead she concluded that the only option was to publish the results and claim it as some sort of victory.
I told you I had Native American blood.
Which is sort of true, I guess? By the genetic standards of vicious racists, per the āone-drop rule,ā she does indeed qualify. Sheās got ⦠about exactly one drop.
In fact, hereās a superb catch by
George Conway (yes, that George Conway) from an
NYT story on genetics and ancestry in America published in 2014:
The researchers found that European-Americans had genomes that were on average 98.6 percent European, .19 percent African, and .18 Native American.
A genome thatās .19 percent native works out to 1/512. So, do the math. The best-case scenario for Warren, that sheās 1/64th native, would mean that around 1.6 percent of her genome is Native American, about 10 times more than the average European-American. The worst-case scenario, 1/1024th, would mean itās around .10 Native American ā roughly half the share the average European-American has. Itās possible, in other words, that Fauxcahontas is
less native than the typical white American.}
Correction: Elizabeth Warren might be as little as 1/1024th Native American