Wacky Quacky
Gold Member
- May 16, 2011
- 2,103
- 377
- 130
As soon as Trump stops lying I'll stop calling him "fake news".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hell yes! You libtards want white to be held responsible for their great great great grandfathers so fuck yea! Stop being a fucking hypocrite! She owes me everything she owns and she’s a fucking Russian kick her ass back to Russia! Or, perhaps Cuba!The granddaughter of Nikita Kruschev!Those regimes are cracking down on jouranalists because they are left wing totalitarians....Trump has nothing to do with that. You guys love the left wing assholes in Cuba, Venezuela and Russia....before hilary lost..... now all of a sudden you care about them murdering and arresting journalists? And that crap hole country....Mexico, where all those people are running away from, I don't see you complaining about the drug cartels with their government allies murdering journalists down there...
"Left wing totalitarians"?
Sorry - Strong-arms like Putin, Erdogan, Assad and Duterte are RW Totalitarians imitating TRUMP with the "fake news" dog whistle that sends dogs like you running every time.
Trump wishes he were one but thanks to the legislative, and judicial branch along with the FREE PRESS - He won't get away with it.
Opinion | Nina Khrushcheva: Trump's totalitarian play-acting is about pomp, not policy
There is no such thing as a left wing totalitarian, but thanks for letting your ignorance pridefully shine through!
This moron is feeding us the opinion of Nikita Kruschev’s granddaughter! He is a communist and a Russia lover!
You obviously know nothing about her - She is a US citizen, a capitalist and VERY bright.
GREAT granddaughter - So what? She's highly critical of communism, Russia and Putin.
Is she responsible for the sins of her great grandfather?![]()
Hell yes! You libtards want white to be held responsible for their great great great grandfathers so fuck yea! Stop being a fucking hypocrite! She owes me everything she owns and she’s a fucking Russian kick her ass back to Russia! Or, perhaps Cuba!
1.Sooo….President Trump labels the enemy media ‘fake news’….and it resonates, because he nailed it: it is fake.
Most media, just as most of the teaching profession and the feminist movement, is joined at the hip with the Liberals/Democrats.
2. Trump must be being successful, because the publisher of the NYTimes is begging him to stop.
“BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — The publisher of The New York Times said Sunday he “implored” President Donald Trump at a private White House meeting this month to reconsider his broad attacks on journalists, calling the president’s anti-press rhetoric “not just divisive but increasingly dangerous.”
In a statement, A.G. Sulzberger said he decided to comment publicly after Trump revealed their off-the-record meeting to his more than 53 million Twitter followers on Sunday. Trump’s aides had requested that the July 20 meeting not be made public, Sulzberger said.
“Had a very good and interesting meeting at the White House with A.G. Sulzberger, Publisher of the New York Times. Spent much time talking about the vast amounts of Fake News being put out by the media & how that Fake News has morphed into phrase, “Enemy of the People.” Sad!” Trump wrote.” Times publisher asks Trump to reconsider anti-media rhetoric
I feel like the mosquito in the nudist colony....I have to figure out where to begin.
3.Let’s begin here: Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.
Even in the face of a history marked with failure, and ignorance, the Left claims to be so much smarter than their opponents. They regularly claim that the Right is anti-science, but Hussein Obama picked this guy as his science adviser:
“John P. Holdren’s advocacy for a global planetary regime to enforce forced abortion, government `seizure of children born out of wedlock, and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy, Obama’s top advisor also called for,”Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods.” Holdren notes that the proposal to forcibly mass sterilize the public against their will “seems to horrify people” and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him too much. Ehrlich, Ehrlich, and Holdren, “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,” http://www.as.wvu.edu/biology/bio463/EHLRICH1.PDF
4. Let’s take a look at who is ‘anti-science’: 93 % of scientists acknowledge the necessity of animal research, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 48% of Democrats. Section 5: Evolution, Climate Change and Other Issues
Nuclear power plants? 70 % of scientists favor, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 45% of Democrats Ibid.
The National Academy of Sciences found that genetically engineered food is safe. So say more Republicans (48%) than Democrats (42%) Who’s More Anti-Science: Republicans or Democrats?
Soooo, when President Trump was elected, the Liberals/Democrats pulled out every arrow in their quiver…..and one of those ‘arrows’ was a pretend march by scientists against trump.
What does this have to do with ‘fake news’???
Coming right up.......
I really want to go out and march to free all the journalists that Trump has had arrested and put in prison....but.....I keep looking and I can't find any.....does anyone know of any journalists Trump has had arrested in the middle of the night....I have this brand new sign I want to carry and a new chant I want to scream...but I can't find any jails holding any journalists.....
First he went for the immigrants, and PC supported this policy;
Then he went for the Unions, and since PC wasn't in a union she supported this policy;
The he went for the Democrats, liberals and progressives, and since PC was a neo fascist, she supported the policy;
Next he went for the MSM, and supported the Brown Shirted Fox Media, but since PC hated the MSM, and loves Sean Hannity, she supported this policy too;
Finally, he came for her, and we finally had something the Despot-in-Chief did correct, and tossed her under the bus. Not for disloyalty, but because she was too toxic and needed to be more subtle in her hate and fear rhetoric and thus were mocked by We the People how were left.
As soon as Trump stops lying I'll stop calling him "fake news".
Yeah yeah yeah! Blowhard!Hell yes! You libtards want white to be held responsible for their great great great grandfathers so fuck yea! Stop being a fucking hypocrite! She owes me everything she owns and she’s a fucking Russian kick her ass back to Russia! Or, perhaps Cuba!
You Trumptards are losing your minds -
Used to be that I'd add "slowly but surely" to my first sentence but it is no longer needed.
Process nearly complete and now moving at the speed of light!![]()
Rebecca Solnit: The Loneliness of Donald Trump
"Donald Trump is a liar. Not just in the sense that we are all fallible human beings who probably say things that aren’t true sometimes — he has made flagrant disregard for the truth a hallmark of his approach to business and politics....He wrote about his strategic use of dishonesty in The Art of The Deal. He admitted to routinely lying about important matters in a sworn deposition...."
The raging controversy over whether to call Trump’s lies "lies," explained
'Trump approval ratings'
How Trump’s Popularity Is Holding Up, By State
How Popular Is Donald Trump?
"What is patriotism? Let us begin with what patriotism is not. It is not patriotic to dodge the draft and to mock war heroes and their families. It is not patriotic to discriminate against active-duty members of the armed forces in one's companies, or to campaign to keep disabled veterans away from one's property. It is not patriotic to compare one's search for sexual partners in New York with the military service in Vietnam that one has dodged. It is not patriotic to avoid paying taxes, especially when American working families do pay. It is not patriotic to ask those working, taxpaying American families to finance one's own presidential campaign, and then to spend their contributions in one's own companies. It is not patriotic to admire foreign dictators. It is not patriotic to cultivate a relationship with Muammar Gaddafi; or to say that Bashar al-Assad and Vladimir Putin are superior leaders. It is not patriotic to call upon Russia to intervene in an American presidential election. It is not patriotic to cite Russian propaganda at rallies." Timothy Snyder On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century by Timothy Snyder
As usual - your diatribe is too long and contains too much subject matter.
Let's boil it down and set the record straight shall we, because Sulzberger is entirely CORRECT!
"I told the president directly that I thought that his language was not just divisive but increasingly dangerous," Sulzberger said in a statement released by the Times about the July 20 meeting at the White House. "I warned that this inflammatory language is contributing to a rise in threats against journalists and will lead to violence."
"I repeatedly stressed that this is particularly true abroad, where the president’s rhetoric is being used by some regimes to justify sweeping crackdowns on journalists," Sulzberger continued. "I warned that it was putting lives at risk, that it was undermining the democratic ideals of our nation, and that it was eroding one of our country’s greatest exports: a commitment to free speech and a free press."
NYT publisher disputes Trump's retelling of off-the-record conversation
1.Sooo….President Trump labels the enemy media ‘fake news’….and it resonates, because he nailed it: it is fake.
Most media, just as most of the teaching profession and the feminist movement, is joined at the hip with the Liberals/Democrats.
2. Trump must be being successful, because the publisher of the NYTimes is begging him to stop.
“BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — The publisher of The New York Times said Sunday he “implored” President Donald Trump at a private White House meeting this month to reconsider his broad attacks on journalists, calling the president’s anti-press rhetoric “not just divisive but increasingly dangerous.”
In a statement, A.G. Sulzberger said he decided to comment publicly after Trump revealed their off-the-record meeting to his more than 53 million Twitter followers on Sunday. Trump’s aides had requested that the July 20 meeting not be made public, Sulzberger said.
“Had a very good and interesting meeting at the White House with A.G. Sulzberger, Publisher of the New York Times. Spent much time talking about the vast amounts of Fake News being put out by the media & how that Fake News has morphed into phrase, “Enemy of the People.” Sad!” Trump wrote.” Times publisher asks Trump to reconsider anti-media rhetoric
I feel like the mosquito in the nudist colony....I have to figure out where to begin.
3.Let’s begin here: Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.
Even in the face of a history marked with failure, and ignorance, the Left claims to be so much smarter than their opponents. They regularly claim that the Right is anti-science, but Hussein Obama picked this guy as his science adviser:
“John P. Holdren’s advocacy for a global planetary regime to enforce forced abortion, government `seizure of children born out of wedlock, and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy, Obama’s top advisor also called for,”Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods.” Holdren notes that the proposal to forcibly mass sterilize the public against their will “seems to horrify people” and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him too much. Ehrlich, Ehrlich, and Holdren, “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,” http://www.as.wvu.edu/biology/bio463/EHLRICH1.PDF
4. Let’s take a look at who is ‘anti-science’: 93 % of scientists acknowledge the necessity of animal research, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 48% of Democrats. Section 5: Evolution, Climate Change and Other Issues
Nuclear power plants? 70 % of scientists favor, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 45% of Democrats Ibid.
The National Academy of Sciences found that genetically engineered food is safe. So say more Republicans (48%) than Democrats (42%) Who’s More Anti-Science: Republicans or Democrats?
Soooo, when President Trump was elected, the Liberals/Democrats pulled out every arrow in their quiver…..and one of those ‘arrows’ was a pretend march by scientists against trump.
What does this have to do with ‘fake news’???
Coming right up.......
Anything inconvenient for the right is "fake news".
1.Sooo….President Trump labels the enemy media ‘fake news’….and it resonates, because he nailed it: it is fake.
Most media, just as most of the teaching profession and the feminist movement, is joined at the hip with the Liberals/Democrats.
2. Trump must be being successful, because the publisher of the NYTimes is begging him to stop.
“BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — The publisher of The New York Times said Sunday he “implored” President Donald Trump at a private White House meeting this month to reconsider his broad attacks on journalists, calling the president’s anti-press rhetoric “not just divisive but increasingly dangerous.”
In a statement, A.G. Sulzberger said he decided to comment publicly after Trump revealed their off-the-record meeting to his more than 53 million Twitter followers on Sunday. Trump’s aides had requested that the July 20 meeting not be made public, Sulzberger said.
“Had a very good and interesting meeting at the White House with A.G. Sulzberger, Publisher of the New York Times. Spent much time talking about the vast amounts of Fake News being put out by the media & how that Fake News has morphed into phrase, “Enemy of the People.” Sad!” Trump wrote.” Times publisher asks Trump to reconsider anti-media rhetoric
I feel like the mosquito in the nudist colony....I have to figure out where to begin.
3.Let’s begin here: Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.
Even in the face of a history marked with failure, and ignorance, the Left claims to be so much smarter than their opponents. They regularly claim that the Right is anti-science, but Hussein Obama picked this guy as his science adviser:
“John P. Holdren’s advocacy for a global planetary regime to enforce forced abortion, government `seizure of children born out of wedlock, and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy, Obama’s top advisor also called for,”Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods.” Holdren notes that the proposal to forcibly mass sterilize the public against their will “seems to horrify people” and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him too much. Ehrlich, Ehrlich, and Holdren, “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,” http://www.as.wvu.edu/biology/bio463/EHLRICH1.PDF
4. Let’s take a look at who is ‘anti-science’: 93 % of scientists acknowledge the necessity of animal research, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 48% of Democrats. Section 5: Evolution, Climate Change and Other Issues
Nuclear power plants? 70 % of scientists favor, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 45% of Democrats Ibid.
The National Academy of Sciences found that genetically engineered food is safe. So say more Republicans (48%) than Democrats (42%) Who’s More Anti-Science: Republicans or Democrats?
Soooo, when President Trump was elected, the Liberals/Democrats pulled out every arrow in their quiver…..and one of those ‘arrows’ was a pretend march by scientists against trump.
What does this have to do with ‘fake news’???
Coming right up.......
I really want to go out and march to free all the journalists that Trump has had arrested and put in prison....but.....I keep looking and I can't find any.....does anyone know of any journalists Trump has had arrested in the middle of the night....I have this brand new sign I want to carry and a new chant I want to scream...but I can't find any jails holding any journalists.....
First he went for the immigrants, and PC supported this policy;
Then he went for the Unions, and since PC wasn't in a union she supported this policy;
The he went for the Democrats, liberals and progressives, and since PC was a neo fascist, she supported the policy;
Next he went for the MSM, and supported the Brown Shirted Fox Media, but since PC hated the MSM, and loves Sean Hannity, she supported this policy too;
Finally, he came for her, and we finally had something the Despot-in-Chief did correct, and tossed her under the bus. Not for disloyalty, but because she was too toxic and needed to be more subtle in her hate and fear rhetoric and thus were mocked by We the People how were left.
1.Sooo….President Trump labels the enemy media ‘fake news’….and it resonates, because he nailed it: it is fake.
Most media, just as most of the teaching profession and the feminist movement, is joined at the hip with the Liberals/Democrats.
2. Trump must be being successful, because the publisher of the NYTimes is begging him to stop.
“BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — The publisher of The New York Times said Sunday he “implored” President Donald Trump at a private White House meeting this month to reconsider his broad attacks on journalists, calling the president’s anti-press rhetoric “not just divisive but increasingly dangerous.”
In a statement, A.G. Sulzberger said he decided to comment publicly after Trump revealed their off-the-record meeting to his more than 53 million Twitter followers on Sunday. Trump’s aides had requested that the July 20 meeting not be made public, Sulzberger said.
“Had a very good and interesting meeting at the White House with A.G. Sulzberger, Publisher of the New York Times. Spent much time talking about the vast amounts of Fake News being put out by the media & how that Fake News has morphed into phrase, “Enemy of the People.” Sad!” Trump wrote.” Times publisher asks Trump to reconsider anti-media rhetoric
I feel like the mosquito in the nudist colony....I have to figure out where to begin.
3.Let’s begin here: Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.
Even in the face of a history marked with failure, and ignorance, the Left claims to be so much smarter than their opponents. They regularly claim that the Right is anti-science, but Hussein Obama picked this guy as his science adviser:
“John P. Holdren’s advocacy for a global planetary regime to enforce forced abortion, government `seizure of children born out of wedlock, and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy, Obama’s top advisor also called for,”Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods.” Holdren notes that the proposal to forcibly mass sterilize the public against their will “seems to horrify people” and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him too much. Ehrlich, Ehrlich, and Holdren, “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,” http://www.as.wvu.edu/biology/bio463/EHLRICH1.PDF
4. Let’s take a look at who is ‘anti-science’: 93 % of scientists acknowledge the necessity of animal research, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 48% of Democrats. Section 5: Evolution, Climate Change and Other Issues
Nuclear power plants? 70 % of scientists favor, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 45% of Democrats Ibid.
The National Academy of Sciences found that genetically engineered food is safe. So say more Republicans (48%) than Democrats (42%) Who’s More Anti-Science: Republicans or Democrats?
Soooo, when President Trump was elected, the Liberals/Democrats pulled out every arrow in their quiver…..and one of those ‘arrows’ was a pretend march by scientists against trump.
What does this have to do with ‘fake news’???
Coming right up.......
Anything inconvenient for the right is "fake news".
Same for the left. The proof is all over this forum.
1.Sooo….President Trump labels the enemy media ‘fake news’….and it resonates, because he nailed it: it is fake.
Most media, just as most of the teaching profession and the feminist movement, is joined at the hip with the Liberals/Democrats.
2. Trump must be being successful, because the publisher of the NYTimes is begging him to stop.
“BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — The publisher of The New York Times said Sunday he “implored” President Donald Trump at a private White House meeting this month to reconsider his broad attacks on journalists, calling the president’s anti-press rhetoric “not just divisive but increasingly dangerous.”
In a statement, A.G. Sulzberger said he decided to comment publicly after Trump revealed their off-the-record meeting to his more than 53 million Twitter followers on Sunday. Trump’s aides had requested that the July 20 meeting not be made public, Sulzberger said.
“Had a very good and interesting meeting at the White House with A.G. Sulzberger, Publisher of the New York Times. Spent much time talking about the vast amounts of Fake News being put out by the media & how that Fake News has morphed into phrase, “Enemy of the People.” Sad!” Trump wrote.” Times publisher asks Trump to reconsider anti-media rhetoric
I feel like the mosquito in the nudist colony....I have to figure out where to begin.
3.Let’s begin here: Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.
Even in the face of a history marked with failure, and ignorance, the Left claims to be so much smarter than their opponents. They regularly claim that the Right is anti-science, but Hussein Obama picked this guy as his science adviser:
“John P. Holdren’s advocacy for a global planetary regime to enforce forced abortion, government `seizure of children born out of wedlock, and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy, Obama’s top advisor also called for,”Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods.” Holdren notes that the proposal to forcibly mass sterilize the public against their will “seems to horrify people” and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him too much. Ehrlich, Ehrlich, and Holdren, “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,” http://www.as.wvu.edu/biology/bio463/EHLRICH1.PDF
4. Let’s take a look at who is ‘anti-science’: 93 % of scientists acknowledge the necessity of animal research, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 48% of Democrats. Section 5: Evolution, Climate Change and Other Issues
Nuclear power plants? 70 % of scientists favor, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 45% of Democrats Ibid.
The National Academy of Sciences found that genetically engineered food is safe. So say more Republicans (48%) than Democrats (42%) Who’s More Anti-Science: Republicans or Democrats?
Soooo, when President Trump was elected, the Liberals/Democrats pulled out every arrow in their quiver…..and one of those ‘arrows’ was a pretend march by scientists against trump.
What does this have to do with ‘fake news’???
Coming right up.......
Anything inconvenient for the right is "fake news".
Same for the left. The proof is all over this forum.
In other words, there is no proof that you can bring to mind...
1.Sooo….President Trump labels the enemy media ‘fake news’….and it resonates, because he nailed it: it is fake.
Most media, just as most of the teaching profession and the feminist movement, is joined at the hip with the Liberals/Democrats.
2. Trump must be being successful, because the publisher of the NYTimes is begging him to stop.
“BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — The publisher of The New York Times said Sunday he “implored” President Donald Trump at a private White House meeting this month to reconsider his broad attacks on journalists, calling the president’s anti-press rhetoric “not just divisive but increasingly dangerous.”
In a statement, A.G. Sulzberger said he decided to comment publicly after Trump revealed their off-the-record meeting to his more than 53 million Twitter followers on Sunday. Trump’s aides had requested that the July 20 meeting not be made public, Sulzberger said.
“Had a very good and interesting meeting at the White House with A.G. Sulzberger, Publisher of the New York Times. Spent much time talking about the vast amounts of Fake News being put out by the media & how that Fake News has morphed into phrase, “Enemy of the People.” Sad!” Trump wrote.” Times publisher asks Trump to reconsider anti-media rhetoric
I feel like the mosquito in the nudist colony....I have to figure out where to begin.
3.Let’s begin here: Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.
Even in the face of a history marked with failure, and ignorance, the Left claims to be so much smarter than their opponents. They regularly claim that the Right is anti-science, but Hussein Obama picked this guy as his science adviser:
“John P. Holdren’s advocacy for a global planetary regime to enforce forced abortion, government `seizure of children born out of wedlock, and mandatory bodily implants designed to prevent pregnancy, Obama’s top advisor also called for,”Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods.” Holdren notes that the proposal to forcibly mass sterilize the public against their will “seems to horrify people” and yet it doesn’t seem to bother him too much. Ehrlich, Ehrlich, and Holdren, “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,” http://www.as.wvu.edu/biology/bio463/EHLRICH1.PDF
4. Let’s take a look at who is ‘anti-science’: 93 % of scientists acknowledge the necessity of animal research, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 48% of Democrats. Section 5: Evolution, Climate Change and Other Issues
Nuclear power plants? 70 % of scientists favor, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 45% of Democrats Ibid.
The National Academy of Sciences found that genetically engineered food is safe. So say more Republicans (48%) than Democrats (42%) Who’s More Anti-Science: Republicans or Democrats?
Soooo, when President Trump was elected, the Liberals/Democrats pulled out every arrow in their quiver…..and one of those ‘arrows’ was a pretend march by scientists against trump.
What does this have to do with ‘fake news’???
Coming right up.......
I really want to go out and march to free all the journalists that Trump has had arrested and put in prison....but.....I keep looking and I can't find any.....does anyone know of any journalists Trump has had arrested in the middle of the night....I have this brand new sign I want to carry and a new chant I want to scream...but I can't find any jails holding any journalists.....
First he went for the immigrants, and PC supported this policy;
Then he went for the Unions, and since PC wasn't in a union she supported this policy;
The he went for the Democrats, liberals and progressives, and since PC was a neo fascist, she supported the policy;
Next he went for the MSM, and supported the Brown Shirted Fox Media, but since PC hated the MSM, and loves Sean Hannity, she supported this policy too;
Finally, he came for her, and we finally had something the Despot-in-Chief did correct, and tossed her under the bus. Not for disloyalty, but because she was too toxic and needed to be more subtle in her hate and fear rhetoric and thus were mocked by We the People how were left.
How many from the MSM are in prison?
Again we see the propagandist arm of the racist party pretend that exposing the lies of propagandists as *going after the press*.
Exposing the fake press and sidestepping their treasonous garbage is not *going after the press*. We still have real journalists. They just don't work for any of the outlets who think they run the show.
No real journalists working for the NYT.
None working at CNN.
Both outlets have been outed dozens of times for printing and airing outright lies, while refusing to cover the news that doesn't fit the fake narrative they create.
Time for them to retire. At least from the white house. They can still post lies, though technically it is libel and they should go to jail for it...
but they don't have a *right* to be in the white house. And they don't have a *right* to have people pretend to believe they're anything but what they are..shills and liars. Fake news pushing a fake narrative in order to overthrow our government.
Kind of like Wry there.
Both sides can be equally fake. The reason it’s seems so prevalent to the right is bc the mainstream media (except Fox News) has largely lefty sentiments. I’ve learned from experience that no news outlet is more trustworthy than another. I’ve seen right-wing sites lie just like left-wing sites. Americans as a whole really has to get past this misguided belief that outlets that echo your feelings about the world (i.e. Trump is bad vs. Trump is good) aren’t any more likely to be 100% honest than outlets that don’t offer shared perspective. Closing ourselves off from certain stories/organizations is tempting, especially when you’ve caught them in one or more lies, but the reality is MOST outlets offer misleading info based on their bias (this is NOT isolated to opinion pieces, as sometimes they’ll not mark an article as opinion that clearly is opinion and even non-opinions can be published in order to fulfill a certain narrative) which is why I think the following article from my signature is so important to read.
Say Goodbye To The Information Age: It’s All About Reputation Now