Plan D

of course .....and who exactly would enforce it and how....

Unfortunately, it is a case of "the mayor does not get speeding tickets." The Palestinians have been demanding a peace agreement based on international law for a long time. Many UN Security Council resolution have been proposed to support that. However, the US has vetoed every one of them.

The only provision in international law pertinent to the matter is the Palestine Mandate according Palestine to the Jewish homeland.

Your knowledge of international law is less than zero.

No UN resolutions are binding.

You are the Forum Dunce.

UN General Assembly resolutions are non binding. UN Security council resolutions are. UN Resolution 181 was a General Assembly resolution. It was to be sent to the SC for approval and implementation. That did not happen. That is why 181 has no meaning.

The Palestine Mandate has no basis in law.
 
Unfortunately, it is a case of "the mayor does not get speeding tickets." The Palestinians have been demanding a peace agreement based on international law for a long time. Many UN Security Council resolution have been proposed to support that. However, the US has vetoed every one of them.

The only provision in international law pertinent to the matter is the Palestine Mandate according Palestine to the Jewish homeland.

Your knowledge of international law is less than zero.

No UN resolutions are binding.

You are the Forum Dunce.

UN General Assembly resolutions are non binding. UN Security council resolutions are. UN Resolution 181 was a General Assembly resolution. It was to be sent to the SC for approval and implementation. That did not happen. That is why 181 has no meaning.

The Palestine Mandate has no basis in law.

Wrong, dope. Security Council resolutions are not universally binding.
UN Res. 181 need not be binding as the Palestine Mandate establishing Palestine as the Jewish homeland is binding.

It is generally acknowledged that UN Res. 181 is Israel's birth certificate.

You are the Forum Dunce.
 
Unfortunately, it is a case of "the mayor does not get speeding tickets." The Palestinians have been demanding a peace agreement based on international law for a long time. Many UN Security Council resolution have been proposed to support that. However, the US has vetoed every one of them.

The only provision in international law pertinent to the matter is the Palestine Mandate according Palestine to the Jewish homeland.

Your knowledge of international law is less than zero.

No UN resolutions are binding.

You are the Forum Dunce.

UN General Assembly resolutions are non binding. UN Security council resolutions are. UN Resolution 181 was a General Assembly resolution. It was to be sent to the SC for approval and implementation. That did not happen. That is why 181 has no meaning.

The Palestine Mandate has no basis in law.

Your knowledge of the law is less than zero.

The Palestine Mandate is the result of an international treaty among the League of Nations that makes it legally binding.

You are the Forum Dunce.
 
You are, evidently, unable ti discern between offensive and defensive wars and the absence of any rule prohibiting seizure of territory under latter circumstances.

Now, you know, Mr. Dunce.

You are the Forum Dunce.

Israel acquired land through aggressive attacks against the Palestinians. Plan Dalet was one of them

Wrong.

As you have been instructed, Israel was attacked. Plan D was defensive, not offensive.

Historian Benny Morris, author of the definitive book on the '48 War, "1948"...
In defiance of the will of the international community, as embodied in the UN General Assembly Resolution of November 29th, 1947 (No. 181), they [Arabs] launched hostilities against the Jewish community in Palestine in the hope of aborting the emergence of the Jewish state and perhaps destroying that community. But they lost; and one of the results was the displacement of 700,000 of them from their homes.

There was no Zionist "plan" or blanket policy of evicting the Arab population, or of "ethnic cleansing".

Plan Dalet (Plan D), of March 10th, 1948 (it is open and available for all to read in the IDF Archive and in various publications), was the master plan of the Haganah - the Jewish military force that became the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) - to counter the expected pan-Arab assault on the emergent Jewish state. That's what it explicitly states and that's what it was. And the invasion of the armies of Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Iraq duly occurred, on May 15th

Pwned, again, dunce.
You are the Forum Dunce.

Israel has always defended itself from the Palestinians like early American settlers always defended themselves from the Indians.
 
The only provision in international law pertinent to the matter is the Palestine Mandate according Palestine to the Jewish homeland.

Your knowledge of international law is less than zero.

No UN resolutions are binding.

You are the Forum Dunce.

UN General Assembly resolutions are non binding. UN Security council resolutions are. UN Resolution 181 was a General Assembly resolution. It was to be sent to the SC for approval and implementation. That did not happen. That is why 181 has no meaning.

The Palestine Mandate has no basis in law.

Your knowledge of the law is less than zero.

The Palestine Mandate is the result of an international treaty among the League of Nations that makes it legally binding.

You are the Forum Dunce.

Which leads back to the unanswered question of why the Zionists accepted a part of a state in 1947 when they received the whole pie 25 years earlier.
 
Israel acquired land through aggressive attacks against the Palestinians. Plan Dalet was one of them

Wrong.

As you have been instructed, Israel was attacked. Plan D was defensive, not offensive.

Historian Benny Morris, author of the definitive book on the '48 War, "1948"...
In defiance of the will of the international community, as embodied in the UN General Assembly Resolution of November 29th, 1947 (No. 181), they [Arabs] launched hostilities against the Jewish community in Palestine in the hope of aborting the emergence of the Jewish state and perhaps destroying that community. But they lost; and one of the results was the displacement of 700,000 of them from their homes.

There was no Zionist "plan" or blanket policy of evicting the Arab population, or of "ethnic cleansing".

Plan Dalet (Plan D), of March 10th, 1948 (it is open and available for all to read in the IDF Archive and in various publications), was the master plan of the Haganah - the Jewish military force that became the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) - to counter the expected pan-Arab assault on the emergent Jewish state. That's what it explicitly states and that's what it was. And the invasion of the armies of Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Iraq duly occurred, on May 15th

Pwned, again, dunce.
You are the Forum Dunce.

Israel has always defended itself from the Palestinians like early American settlers always defended themselves from the Indians.

You cannot even tell us who the so-called Palestinians are. LOL

Historian Bernard Lewis...
At first, the country of which Palestine was a part was felt to be Syria. In Ottoman times, that is, immediately before the coming of the British, Palestine had indeed been a part of a larger Syrian whole from which it was in no way distinguished whether by language, culture, education, administration, political allegiance, or any other significant respect. The dividing line between British-mandated Palestine and French-mandated Syria-Lebanon was an entirely new one and for the people of the area was wholly artificial. It was therefore natural that the nationalist leadership when it first appeared should think in Syrian terms and describe Palestine as southern Syria.

You are the Forum Dunce.
 
Wrong.

As you have been instructed, Israel was attacked. Plan D was defensive, not offensive.

Historian Benny Morris, author of the definitive book on the '48 War, "1948"...


Pwned, again, dunce.
You are the Forum Dunce.

Israel has always defended itself from the Palestinians like early American settlers always defended themselves from the Indians.

You cannot even tell us who the so-called Palestinians are. LOL

Historian Bernard Lewis...
At first, the country of which Palestine was a part was felt to be Syria. In Ottoman times, that is, immediately before the coming of the British, Palestine had indeed been a part of a larger Syrian whole from which it was in no way distinguished whether by language, culture, education, administration, political allegiance, or any other significant respect. The dividing line between British-mandated Palestine and French-mandated Syria-Lebanon was an entirely new one and for the people of the area was wholly artificial. It was therefore natural that the nationalist leadership when it first appeared should think in Syrian terms and describe Palestine as southern Syria.

You are the Forum Dunce.

What is the relevance to Plan Dalet and the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians?
 
Israel has always defended itself from the Palestinians like early American settlers always defended themselves from the Indians.

You cannot even tell us who the so-called Palestinians are. LOL

Historian Bernard Lewis...
At first, the country of which Palestine was a part was felt to be Syria. In Ottoman times, that is, immediately before the coming of the British, Palestine had indeed been a part of a larger Syrian whole from which it was in no way distinguished whether by language, culture, education, administration, political allegiance, or any other significant respect. The dividing line between British-mandated Palestine and French-mandated Syria-Lebanon was an entirely new one and for the people of the area was wholly artificial. It was therefore natural that the nationalist leadership when it first appeared should think in Syrian terms and describe Palestine as southern Syria.

You are the Forum Dunce.

What is the relevance to Plan Dalet and the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians?

Tell us who the Palestinians are. You don't even know. LOL
 
Last edited:
Tell everyone who the Palestinians are. You cannot even do so. LOL

1) Anyone who has lived there forever.

Jews.

2) Anyone who found themselves there for whatever reason but decided to stay and put down roots.

Jews.

Anyone who moved there to be a part of that society.

Jews.

1) And many others.

2) And many others.

3) Some yes, some no. Those who came to be a part of Palestine, yes. Those who came to take over Palestine, no.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top