Parler CEO Says Parler May Be Offline Longer Than Expected -- Why Didn't We Let The Free Market Decide???

[Bryan Luhning]

They are still investigating exactly what happened at the capital. We probably all agree it was not right but who actually lead the violence has yet to be understood. My best guess is anarchist who revel in dividing our nation.

No. It was MAGA. It's known. Pretending it's not known is an attempt to cover the truth.

I am a firm believer in MAGA and I do not support those people who bashed in windows and other illegal acts. So your argument does not make any since. I take it you lean left does that mean you condoned the riots, burning and looting that took place in the summer of love?

 

[colfax_m]

its about "support", you brought up the concept, now defend it.

It shows your inconsistency, and you have nothing to respond with.

Now go slink off and sulk.

It's based on an assumption that I have no desire to find out if it's true or not.

But hey, if you want to try to search the AWS system for objection porn, be my guest, but I have no interest.

 

[martybegan]

The priest didn't tell YOU to burn in hell, this is what the person said.

Because people don't burn other people in hell, but they sure as hell murder people.

So saying "Death to false metal" means you are going to kill Limp Bizkit?

Wow, Weezer is in Trouble.

 

[martybegan]

its about "support", you brought up the concept, now defend it.

It shows your inconsistency, and you have nothing to respond with.

Now go slink off and sulk.

It's based on an assumption that I have no desire to find out if it's true or not.

But hey, if you want to try to search the AWS system for objection porn, be my guest, but I have no interest.

You don't want to find out because right now the tech bullies are bullying people you don't like.

I bet you will mewl like a slapped kitten if and when they change their tune.

 

[Indeependent]

The priest didn't tell YOU to burn in hell, this is what the person said.

Because people don't burn other people in hell, but they sure as hell murder people.

People burn themselves in the next world.
Try to take as little physicality as possible with you when you pass away.

 

[colfax_m]

So saying "Death to false metal" means you are going to kill Limp Bizkit?

Wow, Weezer is in Trouble.

I don't know exactly what false metal is. Is that a person?

You're doing everything you can to ignore context. Here's another gem: “Hang this mofo [Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger] today.”

This is a far cry from saying death to false metal. You're playing stupid because it suits your purposes.

 

[colfax_m]

You don't want to find out because right now the tech bullies are bullying people you don't like.

I bet you will mewl like a slapped kitten if and when they change their tune.

Your search queries for midget porn is your own problem. Not mine.

But the fact that you can't tell the difference between pornography and calls for violence resulting in a riot at the US Capitol is just another example at how your mind has been poisoned.

 

[martybegan]

So saying "Death to false metal" means you are going to kill Limp Bizkit?

Wow, Weezer is in Trouble.

I don't know exactly what false metal is. Is that a person?

You're doing everything you can to ignore context. Here's another gem: “Hang this mofo [Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger] today.”

This is a far cry from saying death to false metal. You're playing stupid because it suits your purposes.

Because you are probably a basement dwelling cuck.

The thing is the hollow death threats are just an excuse, the real goal is the viewpoints of the people you despise and the tech weenies despise being suppressed, and anyone holding them becoming a digital unperson.

 

[martybegan]

You don't want to find out because right now the tech bullies are bullying people you don't like.

I bet you will mewl like a slapped kitten if and when they change their tune.

Your search queries for midget porn is your own problem. Not mine.

But the fact that you can't tell the difference between pornography and calls for violence resulting in a riot at the US Capitol is just another example at how your mind has been poisoned.

The fact that your tech overlords don't bat an eye at pretty disgusting porn but viewpoints like stop the steal or QAnon for some reason give them the vapors and thus have to be banned just shows you don't have anything but "I hate these people and thus they must be silenced"

 

[colfax_m]

Because you are probably a basement dwelling cuck.

The thing is the hollow death threats are just an excuse, the real goal is the viewpoints of the people you despise and the tech weenies despise being suppressed, and anyone holding them becoming a digital unperson.

Hollow death threats? Maybe you don't know much about stochastic terrorism. But this kind of environment is what happens to cause radicalization at which point in time people break off and actually engage in the violence.

Take 4chan and the Christchurch shootings. People engaged in this type of violent rhetoric at length. Many people. And yeah, most of those threats are hollow. But then one of them decides that it's time to actually do something and next thing you know 50 people are dead.

Keep in mind that the whole point here, the very thing you're demanding, is that Amazon is forced to support the propagation of these "hollow threats" that very recently culminated in a riot that killed 5 people.

Do you think all conservatives have been kicked off Twitter and Facebook?

 

[colfax_m]

The fact that your tech overlords don't bat an eye at pretty disgusting porn but viewpoints like stop the steal or QAnon for some reason give them the vapors and thus have to be banned just shows you don't have anything but "I hate these people and thus they must be silenced"

Because disgusting porn doesn't hurt anyone and if it does, the tech giants have no problem in taking it down (such as revenge porn).

 

[martybegan]

Because you are probably a basement dwelling cuck.

The thing is the hollow death threats are just an excuse, the real goal is the viewpoints of the people you despise and the tech weenies despise being suppressed, and anyone holding them becoming a digital unperson.

Hollow death threats? Maybe you don't know much about stochastic terrorism. But this kind of environment is what happens to cause radicalization at which point in time people break off and actually engage in the violence.

Take 4chan and the Christchurch shootings. People engaged in this type of violent rhetoric at length. Many people. And yeah, most of those threats are hollow. But then one of them decides that it's time to actually do something and next thing you know 50 people are dead.

Keep in mind that the whole point here, the very thing you're demanding, is that Amazon is forced to support the propagation of these "hollow threats" that very recently culminated in a riot that killed 5 people.

Do you think all conservatives have been kicked off Twitter and Facebook?

They don't have to "support" anything, they have to funnel 00101010101001 through a pipe and host 0101010100101 on a server.

I think you WANT to kick all conservatives off the web, and are using this as an excuse and Amazon as a proxy to get what you want. Which is why the world will be a better place when you are 6 feet under it.

 

[martybegan]

The fact that your tech overlords don't bat an eye at pretty disgusting porn but viewpoints like stop the steal or QAnon for some reason give them the vapors and thus have to be banned just shows you don't have anything but "I hate these people and thus they must be silenced"

Because disgusting porn doesn't hurt anyone and if it does, the tech giants have no problem in taking it down (such as revenge porn).

Feminists beg to differ on the porn not hurting people thing.

And you really didn't answer my whole statement, because you can't you hateful pathetic little man.

 

[Coyote]

That's where it is leading to.

Why are they removing people and posts that just reference things like QAnon and "Stop the Steal"?

Are those terms now violence?

Ah, so now everything is a "slippery slope" argument. You're backpedaling.

QAnon and Stop the Steal has resulted in a riot and murder at the Capitol building. Or have you been living under a rock?

Jesus, the conspiracies can only go so far before they become dangerous.

They are still investigating exactly what happened at the capital. We probably all agree it was not right but who actually lead the violence has yet to be understood. My best guess is anarchist who revel in dividing our nation.

They are pretty sure who lead to the violence...not much guesswork there as they were pretty open about it. Including the president who claims it was "entirely appropriate".

 

[Coyote]

You don't want to find out because right now the tech bullies are bullying people you don't like.

I bet you will mewl like a slapped kitten if and when they change their tune.

Your search queries for midget porn is your own problem. Not mine.

But the fact that you can't tell the difference between pornography and calls for violence resulting in a riot at the US Capitol is just another example at how your mind has been poisoned.

The fact that your tech overlords don't bat an eye at pretty disgusting porn but viewpoints like stop the steal or QAnon for some reason give them the vapors and thus have to be banned just shows you don't have anything but "I hate these people and thus they must be silenced"

When viewpoints lead to illegal action, and that action is fomented, planned and spread on their platform it goes beyond "I hate those people".

 

[martybegan]

You don't want to find out because right now the tech bullies are bullying people you don't like.

I bet you will mewl like a slapped kitten if and when they change their tune.

Your search queries for midget porn is your own problem. Not mine.

But the fact that you can't tell the difference between pornography and calls for violence resulting in a riot at the US Capitol is just another example at how your mind has been poisoned.

The fact that your tech overlords don't bat an eye at pretty disgusting porn but viewpoints like stop the steal or QAnon for some reason give them the vapors and thus have to be banned just shows you don't have anything but "I hate these people and thus they must be silenced"

When viewpoints lead to illegal action, and that action is fomented, planned and spread on their platform it goes beyond "I hate those people".

Civil disobedience is "illegal action" so that should be prevented on these platforms as well?

If Rosa Parks or MLK had access to facebook back in the day their planning would have been considered bannable?

 

[colfax_m]

They don't have to "support" anything, they have to funnel 00101010101001 through a pipe and host 0101010100101 on a server.

I think you WANT to kick all conservatives off the web, and are using this as an excuse and Amazon as a proxy to get what you want. Which is why the world will be a better place when you are 6 feet under it.

The definition of support would include funneling the data through their pipe and host it on their server. You know this. This isn't controversial. This is simple plain English.

You don't have the slightest clue what I think and are projecting onto me what you want to believe about people like me. This is self serving fantasy, not reality. Your political side is increasingly tolerant of increasingly violent rhetoric.

 

[martybegan]

They don't have to "support" anything, they have to funnel 00101010101001 through a pipe and host 0101010100101 on a server.

I think you WANT to kick all conservatives off the web, and are using this as an excuse and Amazon as a proxy to get what you want. Which is why the world will be a better place when you are 6 feet under it.

The definition of support would include funneling the data through their pipe and host it on their server. You know this. This isn't controversial. This is simple plain English.

You don't have the slightest clue what I think and are projecting onto me what you want to believe about people like me. This is self serving fantasy, not reality. Your political side is increasingly tolerant of increasingly violent rhetoric.

No, it isn't support. Next you will say someone wearing Levi jeans participating in this is forcing Levi to "support" them and thus Levi has the right to demand they take off their pants.

You are an anti-freedom idiot, that's all I need to know.

 

[colfax_m]

Feminists beg to differ on the porn not hurting people thing.

And you really didn't answer my whole statement, because you can't you hateful pathetic little man.

This is a really pathetic argument.

 

[colfax_m]

No, it isn't support. Next you will say someone wearing Levi jeans participating in this is forcing Levi to "support" them and thus Levi has the right to demand they take off their pants.

You are an anti-freedom idiot, that's all I need to know.

No, because ownership of the pants has transferred. Levi's does not control their product once it is sold.

AWS is not selling a product, but a service. Parler does not own the hardware. AWS does. That's why AWS can decide they no longer want to use their hardware to support Parler.

You're the anti-freedom idiot since you want to force AWS to do something they don't want to do with their own private property. Everything you've posted in this thread is about forcing private individuals and companies to bend their knee to people whom you support politically. Another step closer to fascism.