Paris Olympics Opening Ceremony Recreates ‘Last Supper’ with Drag Queens & Trans Performers

[ESay]

yep...

Fans mistakenly claim performer's testicle was seen in Olympics opening ceremony

An innocent mistake has gone viral.

metro.co.uk

What is interesting is that these loons keep pushing their false narrative even though it had already been debunked more than clearly. All in the name of Christian values. Too bad, these thickheads will never get it is they and only they who discredit these values the most.

 

[OldFlame]

You are the problem.

Get over it

Yeah, people not wanting to see some freak's dick swinging around in front of their children or other children, are 'the problem'.

Fuck off.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If mocking Christianity is fair game, then so is mocking Muslims and any other identity group.

Yes, mocking any religion is fair game.

Except you morons got it wrong this time.

Haha, you whine about so much stuff, you don't need to make stuff up to whine about. Crybaby.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yeah, people not wanting to see some freak's dick swinging around in front of their children or other children, are 'the problem'.

Fuck off.

Trumpers inventing stuff to whine about.

Crybabies.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What is interesting is that these loons keep pushing their false narrative even though it had already been debunked more than clearly.

Lie.

Your paranoid wannabe victim narrative was thoroughly debunked, and you are embarrassing yourself.

 

[OldFlame]

Trumpers inventing stuff to whine about.

Crybabies.

When someone uses ridicule in an argument, they are committing an appeal to ridicule, which is a fallacy of relevance. This fallacy occurs when someone tries to support a conclusion with an irrelevant premise. In the case of ridicule, the premise is irrelevant because making fun of a claim doesn't make it false.

The left's entire modus operandi because they have no facts or rational thought.

 

[skews13]

Yeah, people not wanting to see some freak's dick swinging around in front of their children or other children, are 'the problem'.

Fuck off.

Yeah, when some sick freak pastor, bishop, cardinal, bible camp organizer, preacher, and every other freak religious groomer on the planet, was, has been, and still is sticking their dick in children, and you keep licking it clean.

Yeah, we blame you.

Fuck off.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

When someone uses ridicule in an argument, they are committing an appeal to ridicule, which is a fallacy of relevance. This fallacy occurs when someone tries to support a conclusion with an irrelevant premise. In the case of ridicule, the premise is irrelevant because making fun of a claim doesn't make it false.

The left's entire modus operandi because they have no facts or rational thought.

I mocked your idiotic exaggerations and lies. Nobody wants to hear you whine about it.

Now crawl back in your hidey hole and be scared of more stuff that doesn't really happen. Crybaby.

 

[OldFlame]

I mocked your idiotic exaggerations and lies. Nobody wants to hear you whine about it.

Now crawl back in your hidey hole and be scared of more stuff that doesn't really happen. Crybaby.

When someone uses ridicule in an argument, they are committing an appeal to ridicule, which is a fallacy of relevance. This fallacy occurs when someone tries to support a conclusion with an irrelevant premise. In the case of ridicule, the premise is irrelevant because making fun of a claim doesn't make it false.

The left's entire modus operandi because they have no facts or rational thought.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Someone should enter a float in a homo pride parade that depicts fully robed and turbaned Muslims throwing homos off roofs.

 

[eagle1462010]

Yeah, when some sick freak pastor, bishop, cardinal, bible camp organizer, preacher, and every other freak religious groomer on the planet, was, has been, and still is sticking their dick in children, and you keep licking it clean.

Yeah, we blame you.

Fuck off.

Did you sacrifice a chicken before saying that?

You are VILE PEOPLE

 

[ESay]

Lie.

Your paranoid wannabe victim narrative was thoroughly debunked, and you are embarrassing yourself.

Eh?

 

[el midgetron]

Yes, mocking any religion is fair game.

Except you morons got it wrong this time.

Haha, you whine about so much stuff, you don't need to make stuff up to whine about. Crybaby.

Not just religion, I said “any identity group”. Your monkey brain missed that part.

 

[Ringo]

cultural marxism

What a wonderful invention of bourgeois propaganda to declare any perversion of bourgeois society as Marxism.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

What a wonderful invention of bourgeois propaganda to declare any perversion of bourgeois society as Marxism.

You’re thinking of the hypocritical Marxist dupes who condemn bourgeoise society from their bourgeoise perches as they unwittingly assist the undermining of the culture by Marxists.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

When someone uses ridicule in an argument, they are committing an appeal to ridicule, which is a fallacy of relevance. This fallacy occurs when someone tries to support a conclusion with an irrelevant premise. In the case of ridicule, the premise is irrelevant because making fun of a claim doesn't make it false.

The left's entire modus operandi because they have no facts or rational thought.

That's right. I ridiculed you point. I pretty specifically said it was exaggerated nonsense and doesn't really happen.

As usual, you sissied out of an actual response and then started your weird spam trolling.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Not just religion, I said “any identity group”.

Yes, I ignored your irrelevant weasel attempt. Thanks, I can read.

Now squeeze that lump between your ears and see if you can figure out a difference between a set of ideas and a group of humans.

Good luck.

 

[WinterBorn]

So what? You’ve obviously never heard of Cicciolina Ilona Staller.

An Italian politician, she offered to have sex with Saddam Hussein in return for peace.

She made the same offer to Osama bin Laden.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

She made the same offer to Osama bin Laden.

Osama bin Laden, at your service. Where do I report?

 

[el midgetron]

Yes, I ignored your irrelevant weasel attempt. Thanks, I can read.

Now squeeze that lump between your ears and see if you can figure out a difference between a set of ideas and a group of humans.

Good luck.

No no Koko, that’s not how identity works. All “groups of humans” are organized by a “set of ideas”, not just the groups you dislike. Ideological frameworks are how we understand society. Race, like gender, is a social construct. Sexual identity is an entirely subjective reality. Without “sets of ideas” there are NO “groups of people”. It’s sets of ideas that define our identity, and organize us into groups.

You are just referring to your own acceptance of bigotry towards a group of people because they don’t believe the same thing you do.

Social interpretations of race regard the common categorizations of people into different races. Race is often culturally understood to be rigid categories (Black, White, Pasifika, Asian, etc) in which people can be classified based on biological markers or physical traits such as skin colour or facial features. This rigid definition of race is no longer accepted by scientific communities.[1][2] Instead, the concept of 'race' is viewed as a social construct.[3] This means, in simple terms, that it is a human invention and not a biological fact.

Race and society - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org