Palestine Today

[member]

yes, yes.....your video.....wow ! the palestinians... having a good time like they do in vegas....!!!! dancing, face-painting, sitting and relaxing.....it really is a farce-video....did they all TOO vote for the animalistic terrorists as their gov't ?

no matter what you pop up here to make them seem normal -- the terrorists stand out and over-shadow everything (a.f.a.i.c). post all the festival fun and theatre group twirls all you want............

who's their gov't ? .

 

[USAF 2023]

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Excellent Post!!! “ Zionism” was referred to as” Racist” ( the fact that it even exists) but a “ Palestinian State” where No Israelis are allowed isn’t?
Apartheid “ with a Country that has Arabs but a “Palestinian State” wouldn’t be? Please post more of this garbage; looking forward to it !!

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

I have to agree with you.

I rarely find that the pro-Arab Palestinians movements have and understanding of the relationship between Zionism and Apartheid.

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Excellent Post!!! “ Zionism” was referred to as” Racist” ( the fact that it even exists) but a “ Palestinian State” where No Israelis are allowed aren’t? “
Apartheid “ with a Country that has Arabs but a “Palestinian State” wouldn’t be? Please post more of this garbage; looking forward to it !!

(COMMENT)

In the mid-'70's, the General Assembly (GA) passed Resolution A/RES/3379 (XXX) Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, in which the GA "Determines that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."

"In 1989, the General Assembly requested the International Law Commission to address the question of establishing an international criminal court. Three years later, the Assembly requested the Commission to elaborate a statute of such a court as a matter of priority." (From the “EVALUATING THE ICC REGIME: THE LIKELY IMPACT ON STATES AND INTERNATIONAL LAW”) This evaluation leads directly to the creation of the Rome Statutes. While the Rome Statutes would not go into effect for more than a decade, the fundamentals of the legal meaning of "Apartheid" were defined almost immediately. That lead to a very rare event in which the GA passed Resolution A/RES/46/86, Same Title, which " Decides to revoke the determination contained in its resolution 3379 (XXX) of 10 November 1975;" REVERSING the decision that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."

IF there is no racism (racial discrimination) THEN there is no crime of "Apartheid." [See: Article 7 Crimes Against Humanity Para (2h) Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court]

I find it absolutely amazing how often pro-Arab Palestinians try and pass-off this fraudulent racial logic for reasoning to chastise Israel when it should be the pro-Arab Palestinians that should be chastised for intentionally denying obvious implications that were necessary to be deduced in order to find the correct solution (people who twist facts to appear to be the aggrieved party).

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

I have to agree with you.

I rarely find that the pro-Arab Palestinians movements have and understanding of the relationship between Zionism and Apartheid.

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Excellent Post!!! “ Zionism” was referred to as” Racist” ( the fact that it even exists) but a “ Palestinian State” where No Israelis are allowed aren’t? “
Apartheid “ with a Country that has Arabs but a “Palestinian State” wouldn’t be? Please post more of this garbage; looking forward to it !!

(COMMENT)

In the mid-'70's, the General Assembly (GA) passed Resolution A/RES/3379 (XXX) Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, in which the GA "Determines that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."

"In 1989, the General Assembly requested the International Law Commission to address the question of establishing an international criminal court. Three years later, the Assembly requested the Commission to elaborate a statute of such a court as a matter of priority." (From the “EVALUATING THE ICC REGIME: THE LIKELY IMPACT ON STATES AND INTERNATIONAL LAW”) This evaluation leads directly to the creation of the Rome Statutes. While the Rome Statutes would not go into effect for more than a decade, the fundamentals of the legal meaning of "Apartheid" were defined almost immediately. That lead to a very rare event in which the GA passed Resolution A/RES/46/86, Same Title, which " Decides to revoke the determination contained in its resolution 3379 (XXX) of 10 November 1975;" REVERSING the decision that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."

IF there is no racism (racial discrimination) THEN there is no crime of "Apartheid." [See: Article 7 Crimes Against Humanity Para (2h) Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court]

I find it absolutely amazing how often pro-Arab Palestinians try and pass-off this fraudulent racial logic for reasoning to chastise Israel when it should be the pro-Arab Palestinians that should be chastised for intentionally denying obvious implications that were necessary to be deduced in order to find the correct solution (people who twist facts to appear to be the aggrieved party).

Most Respectfully,
R

Zionism. The Developer and Protection of the Jewish State In what is now Israel
That’s “ racist”? GOOD !!

 

[RoccoR]

tRE: Palestine Today
※→ ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

[
Zionism. The Developer and Protection of the Jewish State In what is now Israel
That’s “ racist”? GOOD !!

(CLARIFICATION)

NO it is NOT Racism...

v/r
R

 

[USAF 2023]

tRE: Palestine Today
※→ ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

[
Zionism. The Developer and Protection of the Jewish State In what is now Israel
That’s “ racist”? GOOD !!

(CLARIFICATION)

NO it is NOT Racism...

v/r
R

I know. Concerned about my state of mind. For a minute I was pretending I was a Pro Palestinian Groupi (. JUST. KIDDING ).

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

I have to agree with you.

I rarely find that the pro-Arab Palestinians movements have and understanding of the relationship between Zionism and Apartheid.

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Excellent Post!!! “ Zionism” was referred to as” Racist” ( the fact that it even exists) but a “ Palestinian State” where No Israelis are allowed aren’t? “
Apartheid “ with a Country that has Arabs but a “Palestinian State” wouldn’t be? Please post more of this garbage; looking forward to it !!

(COMMENT)

In the mid-'70's, the General Assembly (GA) passed Resolution A/RES/3379 (XXX) Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, in which the GA "Determines that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."

"In 1989, the General Assembly requested the International Law Commission to address the question of establishing an international criminal court. Three years later, the Assembly requested the Commission to elaborate a statute of such a court as a matter of priority." (From the “EVALUATING THE ICC REGIME: THE LIKELY IMPACT ON STATES AND INTERNATIONAL LAW”) This evaluation leads directly to the creation of the Rome Statutes. While the Rome Statutes would not go into effect for more than a decade, the fundamentals of the legal meaning of "Apartheid" were defined almost immediately. That lead to a very rare event in which the GA passed Resolution A/RES/46/86, Same Title, which " Decides to revoke the determination contained in its resolution 3379 (XXX) of 10 November 1975;" REVERSING the decision that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."

IF there is no racism (racial discrimination) THEN there is no crime of "Apartheid." [See: Article 7 Crimes Against Humanity Para (2h) Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court]

I find it absolutely amazing how often pro-Arab Palestinians try and pass-off this fraudulent racial logic for reasoning to chastise Israel when it should be the pro-Arab Palestinians that should be chastised for intentionally denying obvious implications that were necessary to be deduced in order to find the correct solution (people who twist facts to appear to be the aggrieved party).

Most Respectfully,
R

How can you deny something that is so blatantly in your face obvious?

Your shill capacity is amazing.

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

I have to agree with you.

I rarely find that the pro-Arab Palestinians movements have and understanding of the relationship between Zionism and Apartheid.

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Excellent Post!!! “ Zionism” was referred to as” Racist” ( the fact that it even exists) but a “ Palestinian State” where No Israelis are allowed aren’t? “
Apartheid “ with a Country that has Arabs but a “Palestinian State” wouldn’t be? Please post more of this garbage; looking forward to it !!

(COMMENT)

In the mid-'70's, the General Assembly (GA) passed Resolution A/RES/3379 (XXX) Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, in which the GA "Determines that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."

"In 1989, the General Assembly requested the International Law Commission to address the question of establishing an international criminal court. Three years later, the Assembly requested the Commission to elaborate a statute of such a court as a matter of priority." (From the “EVALUATING THE ICC REGIME: THE LIKELY IMPACT ON STATES AND INTERNATIONAL LAW”) This evaluation leads directly to the creation of the Rome Statutes. While the Rome Statutes would not go into effect for more than a decade, the fundamentals of the legal meaning of "Apartheid" were defined almost immediately. That lead to a very rare event in which the GA passed Resolution A/RES/46/86, Same Title, which " Decides to revoke the determination contained in its resolution 3379 (XXX) of 10 November 1975;" REVERSING the decision that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."

IF there is no racism (racial discrimination) THEN there is no crime of "Apartheid." [See: Article 7 Crimes Against Humanity Para (2h) Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court]

I find it absolutely amazing how often pro-Arab Palestinians try and pass-off this fraudulent racial logic for reasoning to chastise Israel when it should be the pro-Arab Palestinians that should be chastised for intentionally denying obvious implications that were necessary to be deduced in order to find the correct solution (people who twist facts to appear to be the aggrieved party).

Most Respectfully,
R

How can you deny something that is so blatantly in your face obvious?

Your shill capacity is amazing.

Zionism; A movement for and the reestablishment” of a Jewish State in which is now Israel
The above is synonymous with “ racism?’ Yet you see nothing wrong with a Palestinian No Israelis Allowed Policy?
How can a Pro Palestinian have such a Double Standard? ( Its obvious).
Your shill capacity is amazing.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

I have to agree with you.

I rarely find that the pro-Arab Palestinians movements have and understanding of the relationship between Zionism and Apartheid.

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Excellent Post!!! “ Zionism” was referred to as” Racist” ( the fact that it even exists) but a “ Palestinian State” where No Israelis are allowed aren’t? “
Apartheid “ with a Country that has Arabs but a “Palestinian State” wouldn’t be? Please post more of this garbage; looking forward to it !!

(COMMENT)

In the mid-'70's, the General Assembly (GA) passed Resolution A/RES/3379 (XXX) Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, in which the GA "Determines that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."

"In 1989, the General Assembly requested the International Law Commission to address the question of establishing an international criminal court. Three years later, the Assembly requested the Commission to elaborate a statute of such a court as a matter of priority." (From the “EVALUATING THE ICC REGIME: THE LIKELY IMPACT ON STATES AND INTERNATIONAL LAW”) This evaluation leads directly to the creation of the Rome Statutes. While the Rome Statutes would not go into effect for more than a decade, the fundamentals of the legal meaning of "Apartheid" were defined almost immediately. That lead to a very rare event in which the GA passed Resolution A/RES/46/86, Same Title, which " Decides to revoke the determination contained in its resolution 3379 (XXX) of 10 November 1975;" REVERSING the decision that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."

IF there is no racism (racial discrimination) THEN there is no crime of "Apartheid." [See: Article 7 Crimes Against Humanity Para (2h) Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court]

I find it absolutely amazing how often pro-Arab Palestinians try and pass-off this fraudulent racial logic for reasoning to chastise Israel when it should be the pro-Arab Palestinians that should be chastised for intentionally denying obvious implications that were necessary to be deduced in order to find the correct solution (people who twist facts to appear to be the aggrieved party).

Most Respectfully,
R

How can you deny something that is so blatantly in your face obvious?

Your shill capacity is amazing.

Zionism; A movement for and the reestablishment” of a Jewish State in which is now Israel
The above is synonymous with “ racism?’ Yet you see nothing wrong with a Palestinian No Israelis Allowed Policy?
How can a Pro Palestinian have such a Double Standard? ( Its obvious).
Your shill capacity is amazing.

Palestine has no discriminatory laws. Israel does.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

• Abbas pledges: There will be no Israelis in Palestine

• Abbas adds 'hard labor' to punishment for Palestinians who sell land to Israelis

• “In the final resolution, we would not see the presence of a single Israeli -- civilian or soldier -- on our lands.”

• In April 2009, a Chief Islamic Judge of the Palestinian Authority reminded of an existing fatwa that bans Palestinians from selling property to Jews, which is considered high treason and punishable by death.
Abu Toameh, Khaled (2009-04-01). "PA: Death Penalty for Those who Sell Land to Jews"

Palestine has no discriminatory laws. Israel does.

(COMMENT)

You're kidding me --- right?

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

• Abbas pledges: There will be no Israelis in Palestine

• Abbas adds 'hard labor' to punishment for Palestinians who sell land to Israelis

• “In the final resolution, we would not see the presence of a single Israeli -- civilian or soldier -- on our lands.”

• In April 2009, a Chief Islamic Judge of the Palestinian Authority reminded of an existing fatwa that bans Palestinians from selling property to Jews, which is considered high treason and punishable by death.
Abu Toameh, Khaled (2009-04-01). "PA: Death Penalty for Those who Sell Land to Jews"

Palestine has no discriminatory laws. Israel does.

(COMMENT)

You're kidding me --- right?

Most Respectfully,
R

There is an old Jordanian law, still valid in the West Bank, that forbids land sales to Israelis and their agents. This makes sense because Israel is an enemy.

I haven't heard of any restriction on non Israeli Jews. The problem with Jews buying land is that they always bring Israel with them.

 

[rylah]

I haven't heard of any restriction on non Israeli Jews.

You try to deny the most evident:

PA: DEATH PENALTY FOR THOSE WHO SELL LAND TO JEWS
Authority's Chief Islamic Judge issues warning after reports of US Jews buying land from Palestinians.

The Palestinian Authority has issued yet another warning to Palestinians against selling their homes or properties to Jews, saying those who violate the order would be accused of "high treason" - a charge that carries the death penalty. The latest warning was issued on Wednesday by the Chief [Islamic] Judge of the Palestinian Authority, Sheikh Tayseer Rajab Tamimi, who reminded the Palestinians of an existing fatwa [religious decree] than bans them from selling property to Jews.

( Chief Sharia Judge - Tayysir Tamimi)

 

[rylah]

Q.Israeli and any other Jew is referred to as 'the enemy' in Palestinian law.
Where's the distinction?

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

I have to agree with you.

I rarely find that the pro-Arab Palestinians movements have and understanding of the relationship between Zionism and Apartheid.

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Muslim-Americans discuss attitudes toward Israel

Excellent Post!!! “ Zionism” was referred to as” Racist” ( the fact that it even exists) but a “ Palestinian State” where No Israelis are allowed aren’t? “
Apartheid “ with a Country that has Arabs but a “Palestinian State” wouldn’t be? Please post more of this garbage; looking forward to it !!

(COMMENT)

In the mid-'70's, the General Assembly (GA) passed Resolution A/RES/3379 (XXX) Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, in which the GA "Determines that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."

"In 1989, the General Assembly requested the International Law Commission to address the question of establishing an international criminal court. Three years later, the Assembly requested the Commission to elaborate a statute of such a court as a matter of priority." (From the “EVALUATING THE ICC REGIME: THE LIKELY IMPACT ON STATES AND INTERNATIONAL LAW”) This evaluation leads directly to the creation of the Rome Statutes. While the Rome Statutes would not go into effect for more than a decade, the fundamentals of the legal meaning of "Apartheid" were defined almost immediately. That lead to a very rare event in which the GA passed Resolution A/RES/46/86, Same Title, which " Decides to revoke the determination contained in its resolution 3379 (XXX) of 10 November 1975;" REVERSING the decision that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."

IF there is no racism (racial discrimination) THEN there is no crime of "Apartheid." [See: Article 7 Crimes Against Humanity Para (2h) Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court]

I find it absolutely amazing how often pro-Arab Palestinians try and pass-off this fraudulent racial logic for reasoning to chastise Israel when it should be the pro-Arab Palestinians that should be chastised for intentionally denying obvious implications that were necessary to be deduced in order to find the correct solution (people who twist facts to appear to be the aggrieved party).

Most Respectfully,
R

How can you deny something that is so blatantly in your face obvious?

Your shill capacity is amazing.

Zionism; A movement for and the reestablishment” of a Jewish State in which is now Israel
The above is synonymous with “ racism?’ Yet you see nothing wrong with a Palestinian No Israelis Allowed Policy?
How can a Pro Palestinian have such a Double Standard? ( Its obvious).
Your shill capacity is amazing.

Palestine has no discriminatory laws. Israel does.

Is that why Abbas is stating No Israelis Allowed???? Denying Rylah’s link? Talk about a schill carrying water for the Palestinians!!

 

[P F Tinmore]

Q.Israeli and any other Jew is referred to as 'the enemy' in Palestinian law.
Where's the distinction?

Those who do not bring Israel with them are welcome.

Those who do, aren't.

 

[USAF 2023]

Q.Israeli and any other Jew is referred to as 'the enemy' in Palestinian law.
Where's the distinction?

Those who do not bring Israel with them are welcome.

Those who do, aren't.

Yawn..... Notice there is no comment about the “ No Israelis Allowed “ Policy or killing / sentencing Palestinians to hard labor who sell land to Israelis????
Talk about deflection and being a shill

 

[rylah]

Q.Israeli and any other Jew is referred to as 'the enemy' in Palestinian law.
Where's the distinction?

Those who do not bring Israel with them are welcome.

Those who do, aren't.

There's no such distinction,
You have death penalty for people who sell property to any Jew by definition,
any Jew is considered an enemy by the Palestinian Sharia Courts.

 

[USAF 2023]

Q.Israeli and any other Jew is referred to as 'the enemy' in Palestinian law.
Where's the distinction?

Those who do not bring Israel with them are welcome.

Those who do, aren't.

There's no such distinction,
You have death penalty for people who sell property to any Jew by definition,
any Jew is considered an enemy by the Palestinian Sharia Courts.

I guarantee you there will be no comment RE; No Israelis Allowed or Death Penalty for those who sell land to Israelis. He’s too busy being the water boy for the Pro Palestinian Team

 

[member]

I haven't heard of any restriction on non Israeli Jews.

You try to deny the most evident:

PA: DEATH PENALTY FOR THOSE WHO SELL LAND TO JEWS
Authority's Chief Islamic Judge issues warning after reports of US Jews buying land from Palestinians.

The Palestinian Authority has issued yet another warning to Palestinians against selling their homes or properties to Jews, saying those who violate the order would be accused of "high treason" - a charge that carries the death penalty. The latest warning was issued on Wednesday by the Chief [Islamic] Judge of the Palestinian Authority, Sheikh Tayseer Rajab Tamimi, who reminded the Palestinians of an existing fatwa [religious decree] than bans them from selling property to Jews.

( Chief Sharia Judge - Tayysir Tamimi)

Chief Tribal Judge Sheik Tayysir.............

**** him. he's just a primitive bastard............

...he's why the muslim world is what it is. backwards. He's no different than every taliban miscreant that lives and breathes on planet earth...............he's just dressed a little differently... the taliban have more of a filthy beastly look....but nonetheless....they're joined at the brain.........

 

[Shusha]

There is an old Jordanian law, still valid in the West Bank, that forbids land sales to Israelis and their agents. This makes sense because Israel is an enemy.

I haven't heard of any restriction on non Israeli Jews. The problem with Jews buying land is that they always bring Israel with them.

Couldn't you also say, "the problem with Arabs is that they always bring Palestine with them" and thus try to justify a lifetime of hard labor for anyone selling land to Arab Palestinians because they are the "enemy"?

Seems to me that there are a different set of standards for Israel than for Arabs.