You view of Islam is bidah, innovation and rejects traditional Islam.
Ooorah!!!
- Thread starter JenT
- Start date
You view of Islam is bidah, innovation and rejects traditional Islam.
Kalam
Senior Member
- Mar 5, 2009
- 8,866
- 785
- 48
Fortunately, your opinion doesn't mean much to me.
Wrong. She has repeatedly claimed that Sirat Rasul Allah is, in her own words, a "holy book."
In your opinion, which is based on, what, a year or two of reading about Islam on Wahhabi internet websites?
Whose interpretation of sharia? How do you know that it's correct?
I'm called a Muslim by all of the Muslims I know.
I speak for Qur'anic Islam.
Nothing about my interpretation of the Qur'an is "irrational." It's based on scriptural and historical context.
Oxymoronic.
You attempt to dismiss it as such because you're unable to prove me wrong in religious discussions.
You've got the "tool" part down, but I wouldn't call you "entertaining."
Kalam
Senior Member
- Mar 5, 2009
- 8,866
- 785
- 48
I was speaking to jent. Be a troll somewhere else.
Right back @ ya.
JenT
God lead our troops
- Thread starter
- #65
But it does to me and anyone else wandering by.
"Holy" - 1.Belonging to, derived from, or associated with a divine power; sacred.
Is Muhammad not associated with a divine power? Because the Sira is the oldest written document about the life of Muhammad, and even the website you directed me to uses it.
Okay on THIS LINK. even the website YOU referred me to refers to the "The Life Of Muhammad", "A Translation of Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah", it's the same book
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1421400-post429.html
That took me a heck of a long time to find that, don't ask me again please
Research. Like everybody else. Anything can be translated. Anything can be researched.
what are you guys talking about?
Kalam, what's your background again? I'm sure you've already said, forgive me, I didn't write it down. Were you raised Muslim? Live in the ME?
I don't think it's irrational. I think it's the part where Muhammad presents it in peace. You probably believe it is peace. Most western Muslims do. Our government is trying to convince everyone that's what it is, rewrite the whole religion. But it's not. And the fundamentalist Muslims know this and as soon as more people convert the demands go up right along with it.
not sure where the quotes ended there
Kalam, the method of Muhammad proves you wrong. History proves you wrong. Every Christian and Jew being slaughtered today proves you wrong. The only thing that doesn't prove you wrong is our government, whom I believe has bartered our public schools to indoctrinate Islam for whatever they could get.
How Clinton Surrendered Children Islam
Last edited:
Kalam
Senior Member
- Mar 5, 2009
- 8,866
- 785
- 48
What makes you think that?
Wrong. That article is critical of Ibn Ishaq's account. An excerpt:
"So then the real source of this unacceptable story of slaughter was the descendants of the Jews of Medina, from whom Ibn Ishaq took these "odd tales". For doing so Ibn Ishaq was severely criticized by other scholars and historians and was called by Malik an impostor.
The sources of the story are, therefore, extremely doubtful and the details are diametrically opposed to the spirit of Islam and the rules of the Qur'an to make the story credible. Credible authority is lacking, and circumstantial evidence does not support it. This means that the story is more than doubtful."
The sources of the story are, therefore, extremely doubtful and the details are diametrically opposed to the spirit of Islam and the rules of the Qur'an to make the story credible. Credible authority is lacking, and circumstantial evidence does not support it. This means that the story is more than doubtful."
Sorry, sister, no dice.
Do you accept that Sirat Rasul Allah is not a "holy book," or can you show me a credible Islamic source that describes it as such?
If only you'd spent half that time reading it, you could have avoided disproving your own argument...
That doesn't answer the question.
Mr. Fitnah is unable to address my points directly and has unsurprisingly resorted to dishonest debate tactics such as accusing my sect of being outside of the fold of Islam.
My background is unimportant. No matter what I say, you'll attempt to use it against me somehow. Know that I've devoted myself to the study and defense of Islam for quite some time. I'm quite familiar with the Qur'an and have studied most major hadith collections and peripheral writings, such as those of Ibn Ishaq. The peripheral writings seem to be, for the most part, without merit.
Abiding by the entire Qur'an as I do involves maintaining a peaceful and brotherly demeanor towards believers, while treating disbelievers with respect so long as they act similarly. You're repeating the now-discredited platitude about Makkan verses being peaceful and Madinan verses being belligerent. An honest perusal of the passages I provided from throughout the entire book will leave you with no choice but to toss this ridiculous notion out of the window.
Rest assured, my geographical location has little bearing on my religious beliefs.
"Fundamentalist" is a misnomer. You're describing radicals, who attempt to distort the meaning of Islamic scripture to accommodate their hateful political ideologies, not unlike you and Fitnuts.
Another platitude with no basis in fact.
Not sure what you're talking about...
I've proved this wrong and will again if necessary.
It's your duty to establish an irrefutable link between these things and Qur'anic scripture (protip: you can't.)
Another testament to your delusion and paranoia.
I have shown your views to be translucently ludicrous, nothing can be proven to you you are utterly fact proof . I'm certain you don't find it entertaining.
I said early on I have no interest in defining real Islam, Ill leave that to the muslims, my interest is t.o show what mainstream Islam thought says about infidels and jihad.
If you have some legal decision based on Islamic scripture from any Islamic scholar that abrogates: ( protip: you cant)
8:39
And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world[]]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do
2:193.
And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allâh) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allâh (Alone).[] But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zâlimûn (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc193
Index of /what-is-islam/quran/noble
Tafsir.com Tafsir Ibn Kathir
Tafsir.com Tafsir Ibn Kathir
Tafsir.com Tafsir Ibn Kathir
The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah
http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20980
Paying Jizyah is a Sign of Kufr and Disgrace
http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=20986
Fighting the Jews and Christians is legislated because They are Idolators and Disbelievers
http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=9&tid=21668
The some off the justification beleivers use for killing none muslims
Post it.
Last edited:
Sorry didn't mean to kill your thread, I have a habit of refuting muslims at will.HEY! This is my honor to the troops thread!
and further discussion about Islam, please post on any of the other MANY ones we got going, thanks!
who did that?
Kalam
Senior Member
- Mar 5, 2009
- 8,866
- 785
- 48
Ibn Kathir's writings are without merit because he produced them having already assumed that certain ahadith were reliable. The proper approach involves beginning with the Qur'an and rejecting all tradition that is inconsistent with it. Ibn Kathir attempted to reconcile the Qur'an with false traditions and found himself unable to produce a tafsir consistent with the entire Qur'anic message because of this.
Kalam
Senior Member
- Mar 5, 2009
- 8,866
- 785
- 48
Feel free to begin whenever you feel comfortable.
JW Frogen
Gold Member
- May 10, 2009
- 6,220
- 1,243
- 155
Kalam, I bet you have beautiful hair under that cover.
Don't you want to feel the sunshine on your lovely locks?
See, here is the problem with you text oriented God freaks, (Christian, Buddist, Muslim, it does not matter) you think you can read your way to God?
You want easy rules sent down from on high.
You really don't want to experience the mystery, the terror, the doubt, the sweet sadness, the wonder, the love of it all; no, you want a theological, paint by numbers God.
And God just does not do that.
Men do, but not God.
Don't you want to feel the sunshine on your lovely locks?
See, here is the problem with you text oriented God freaks, (Christian, Buddist, Muslim, it does not matter) you think you can read your way to God?
You want easy rules sent down from on high.
You really don't want to experience the mystery, the terror, the doubt, the sweet sadness, the wonder, the love of it all; no, you want a theological, paint by numbers God.
And God just does not do that.
Men do, but not God.
Last edited:
That is not a legal ruling, that is typical "kalam" drivel.
The Quran has a message of compassion for muslims and a message of genocide for none muslims .That is the spectrum of the Quranic message.
It is naturally inconsistent.
Zamakhshari, Abu al-Qasim Mahmud ibn Umar
(d. 1144 )
Mutazili theologian, Arabic philologist, and Quran exegete of Persian origin. His Quran commentary, Al-kashshaf an haqaiq al-tanzil, exhibits his Mutazili dogmas with little attention to tradition and elaborates on lexical, grammatical, and rhetorical elements while interpreting the Quran and highlighting its miraculous inimitability. His Al-mufassal is an exhaustive exposition of Arabic grammar, and his Asas al-balagha is a dictionary of Arabic. His literary works include Maqamat, containing moralizing discourses; his diwan of poems; and Al-mustaqsa fi-l-amthal, a popular collection of proverbs.
Zamakhshari, Abu al-Qasim Mahmud ibn Umar - Oxford Islamic Studies Online
Sometimes, the requirements for jizyah could be interpreted severely. In Tafsir al-kashshaf, the Mutazilah exegete al-Zamakhshari (d. 1144) assumes that the intent of the Quranic commandment was to highlight the subordinate status of the dhimmi in Muslim society.
Therefore, the jizyah should be exacted as a form of humiliation. The non-Muslim should come to pay the tax walking, not riding. When he pays, he is made to stand, while the tax collector sits. The collector should seize him by the scruff of the neck, shake him, and say, “Pay the jizyah!”, cuffing him on the back of the head once the tax has been paid.
A similarly hard line is taken by the modern commentator and political activist Sayyid Qutb (d. 1966) in his widely read commentary, Fi ?ilal al-Qur?an. This prominent ideologist of the Muslim Brotherhood is defiantly triumphalist, claiming that jizyah amounts to a punishment for polytheism (especially for Christians) and is required before peaceful relations can be established between Muslims and the “People of the Book.” Seeing shari?ah (the divine law) as a sort of positive law, Qu?b intimates that jizyah is a recompense or protection, not from military service or external enemies, but from jihad. If it is not paid as part of a peace agreement, the Islamic state owes no obligation to non-Muslims, whether at home or abroad.
Log In - Oxford Islamic Studies Online
Paying Jizyah is a Sign of Kufr and Disgrace
Tafsir.com Tafsir Ibn Kathir
A differance with out much of a distinction.
Not compulsion is religion? sounds just like compulsion.
(d. 1144 )
Mutazili theologian, Arabic philologist, and Quran exegete of Persian origin. His Quran commentary, Al-kashshaf an haqaiq al-tanzil, exhibits his Mutazili dogmas with little attention to tradition and elaborates on lexical, grammatical, and rhetorical elements while interpreting the Quran and highlighting its miraculous inimitability. His Al-mufassal is an exhaustive exposition of Arabic grammar, and his Asas al-balagha is a dictionary of Arabic. His literary works include Maqamat, containing moralizing discourses; his diwan of poems; and Al-mustaqsa fi-l-amthal, a popular collection of proverbs.
Zamakhshari, Abu al-Qasim Mahmud ibn Umar - Oxford Islamic Studies Online
Sometimes, the requirements for jizyah could be interpreted severely. In Tafsir al-kashshaf, the Mutazilah exegete al-Zamakhshari (d. 1144) assumes that the intent of the Quranic commandment was to highlight the subordinate status of the dhimmi in Muslim society.
Therefore, the jizyah should be exacted as a form of humiliation. The non-Muslim should come to pay the tax walking, not riding. When he pays, he is made to stand, while the tax collector sits. The collector should seize him by the scruff of the neck, shake him, and say, “Pay the jizyah!”, cuffing him on the back of the head once the tax has been paid.
A similarly hard line is taken by the modern commentator and political activist Sayyid Qutb (d. 1966) in his widely read commentary, Fi ?ilal al-Qur?an. This prominent ideologist of the Muslim Brotherhood is defiantly triumphalist, claiming that jizyah amounts to a punishment for polytheism (especially for Christians) and is required before peaceful relations can be established between Muslims and the “People of the Book.” Seeing shari?ah (the divine law) as a sort of positive law, Qu?b intimates that jizyah is a recompense or protection, not from military service or external enemies, but from jihad. If it is not paid as part of a peace agreement, the Islamic state owes no obligation to non-Muslims, whether at home or abroad.
Log In - Oxford Islamic Studies Online
Paying Jizyah is a Sign of Kufr and Disgrace
Tafsir.com Tafsir Ibn Kathir
A differance with out much of a distinction.
Not compulsion is religion? sounds just like compulsion.
Last edited:
Similar threads
New Topics
-
I was at a Football Tournament and event held by the serbian orthodox church in upper Austria- Started by Mortimer
- Replies: 0
-
US military says it carried out ‘self-defense’ strikes in Iran, including missile launch sites- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
